Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2016/Transpressionism

The following discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 08:17, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Transpressionism (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Macdonald-ross has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable because the issue is not debated and referenced with independent reliable sources. Not given in the Tate guide to modern art terms. I suggest the page has only been put up to support the biog of a particular artist. Macdonald-ross (talk) 12:54, 16 March 2016 (UTC) Macdonald-ross (talk) 12:54, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

• Delete — No mention of transpressionism or indeed Novin in any critical work or books in the Bodleian Library catalogue. --Yottie ^=talk= 13:17, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as not notable. Appears to be a neologism. User:Rus793 (talk) 19:16, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 12:54, 23 March 2016 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.