Wikidata:Interwiki conflicts/Unresolved/2014

Urban area = sv: Tätort = no: Tettsted This is a conflict, the swedish word coult not be saved because there is a page called "Urban areas in Sweden" that corspond to the swedish word. A good solution is to merge the latest mentioned page in the page "Urban area". Krg (talk) 23:09, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Lavallen: Thoughts? --Izno (talk) 13:30, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The English article "Urban area" "Q702492" is "International". There is also a "Nordic" standard (Sweden, Norway, Finland and Denmark) from 1960 who have another formal standard. (The difference is maybe that a Nordic urban area often is smaller and maybe have larger distances between the houses, compared with an international.) But that standard also allow some local differences between the nations. (In Sweden we are counting the summer and holiday homes separatly, and do not allow to many of them, why a Norwegian urban area does not always fit into the Swedish standard.) SO, I guess we need separate items for "International", "Nordic", "Swedish" and "Norwegian" urban areas. I know that also the Norwegian definition is a little separate from the "Nordic standard" from 1960, so I guess that also need an Item of it own. I do not know if we have any items about Finnish or Danish urban areas and if they have any differences from the Nordic standard. So, I guess we can rename Q6566301 to "Urban area in the Nordic nations" or something like that. Some of the sitelinks maybe have to be moved to "Q12813115". The Danish (a redirect) and the Italian looks like they definitly have to be moved to that item. In Sweden we also have some other definitions named "Fritidshusområde", "Småort" and "Arbetsplatsområde" who are related to Tätort, but they not the same thing. -- Lavallen (talk) 15:15, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't yet got a reply so I write here, even though I don't think this is right place. Shouldn't "Urban areas of Sweden" be changed to "Urban areas in Sweden" as the Wikipedia article is called? --IRISZOOM (talk) 01:55, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In issue (Q86447), there are items depicting the concept of money creation ("issue" in terms of finance), "issue" as in offspring, etc. May somebody please look into this? --Wylve (talk) 09:50, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There are two languages/dialects known as Cantonese: Cantonese (Q9186) (Guangzhou) and Yue Chinese (Q7033959) (Yue). But some links in Cantonese (Q9186) about Yue. Need somebody who knows Chinese. --putnik 04:17, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

cf Wikidata:Interwiki_conflicts/Unresolved/2013#Q9186.2FQ7033959_.28Yue_Chinese.2FCantonese.29 --Zuphilip (talk) 20:36, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The German wikipedia article under Q1613096 refers to both entities. --GVogeler (talk) 07:45, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I tried to improve it and collect the items with a focus on the 1709 magazine in The Tatler (Q1613096). The English article en:Tatler speaks only about the new magazine (from 1901). The Spanish Wikpedia seems to treat both in equal parts. Can someone check the Russian Wikipedia? Should it better be seperated because there is also a Russian version of the magazine? --Zuphilip (talk) 12:05, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"Borders" and "state border". Matěj Suchánek (talk) 18:43, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I added a subclass relation between them. Maybe the political border (Q13433949) and political border (Q1292279) could be merged? But the Japanese link there seems suspicious. --Zuphilip (talk) 21:49, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merged and deleted. Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 12:20, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I assume this is not an interwiki conflict but Ididn't find an appropiate task force to signalize the problem. The articles from East Asian Yogācāra (Q349849) should be separated in two wikidata items: one should contain the articles about the general notion (en:East Asian Yogācāra, it:Buddhismo Fǎxiāng, no:Faxiang zong) and the other one the Japonese version of it (de:Hossō-shū, fr:Hossō-shū, hu:Hosszó and probably the ru and uk articles as well). I have no idea about the remaining three (ja, ko and zhwiki); and no experience with splitting wikidata items. --Hkoala (talk) 16:48, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I just have created Q15606337, which seems to be member of the first group... --Zuphilip (talk) 17:07, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There are now three objects

• East Asian Yogācāra (Q349849) --> part of the buddhism in Japan
• Q4481407 --> part of the buddhism in China
• Q15608627 --> disambiguation page

The English link is the only one who describes both of them in one page, but it has some focus on China. Thus, it connected to the one about China. Can someone look at ja, ko and zhwiki and link them accordingly? --Zuphilip (talk) 21:49, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Both of these are same subject: the economies of European countries more problematic. In this case, the solution is just unifying the interwiki because no duplicate pages.

These were split for no reason that I can observe. Pikolas? --Izno (talk) 00:33, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I split them because technically speaking they're not exactly the same. One of them includes one more country (either Italy or Ireland), and if we use the property has part(s) (P527) to explicit which economies the acronym refers to, merging PIGS with PIIGS can cause problems. Pikolas (talk) 15:18, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia articles this interwiki data item links to seem to describe similar but not really identical concepts.

• The German article de:Joch (Architektur) is at least in it's current form a lot more restricted in it's scope than en:Bay (architecture).
• The recently added cs:Klenební pole seems odd, looks more like Q189771.
  
• de:Joch (Architektur) and de: Interkolumnium are similar but different but this wikdata item for Joch links to ca:Intercolumni and es: Intercolumnio.

There is probably more

I'm no architect or art historian and don't speak enough of most of the involved languages to really sort this out, so would appreciate any help on this.

Thanks, --S.K. (talk) 23:10, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

PS: I'm not sure if here is the right place, so pointing me towards such a place is appreciated if it is not.

I moved es and ca-wiki link to intercolumniation (Q1364172). - In the talk page of enwiki also fr:Baie (architecture) was mentioned which is now bay (Q2879412). - I guess that cs:Klenební pole is a subclass of Q189771, because there is already a cswiki attached to it. I guess this needs more clean-up... --Zuphilip (talk) 11:46, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This might be helpful for German: http://www.duden.de/rechtschreibung/Joch --Zuphilip (talk) 11:52, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In the Dutch Wikipedia "Witlof" doesn't have a link to the portuguese wikipedia. In portuguese this vegetable is known as Endivia. I understand the misunderstanding, because "Andijvie" is a different vegetable in Dutch. However in this "Witlof" in the Dutch wiki should point to the portuguese "Endívia"

Why should nl:Witlof point to pt:Endívia if they are different? The scientific names for them are "Cichorium endivia" and "Cichorium intybus var. foliosum", where the second one splits up in several objects. Moreover, on nl:Andijvie it is written: "Endive ( Cichorium endivia ) is an annual plant leaf that is closely related to Witlof ( Cichorium intybus var. foliosum )." It seems fine for me as it is. --Zuphilip (talk) 16:19, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

probably some interwikis should be move to the second one, such as euwiki, cawiki, ...--GZWDer (talk) 09:26, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ca:Presentador has category:television and seems correct, also eu:urkezle seems fine for me. I couldn't find any links, which are clearly wrong attached. television presenter (Q947873) is the item, where most of the languages are attached to, and the languages which have also another page are mostly collected in presenter (Q13590141). Thus, GZWDer, I would suggest to leave it as it is, okay? --Zuphilip (talk) 11:55, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia articles referring to a party and its newspaper (which shares the same name as the party) are in the same item. --Wylve (talk) 17:14, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't found any wikipedia page about the journal, only the French article speaks about both: fr:Lutte_ouvrière. I changed the properties of the object to the political parti, such that at least the linked person will fit into the constraints of member of political party (P102). --Zuphilip (talk) 19:29, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I believe that the english term "Extenuating circumstances" should be linked to italian term "Attenuante" rather than the current "Circostanza". "Circostanza" is a general term which includes both Extenuating and Aggravation, and since Aggravation is (correctly) linked to "Aggravante" doesn't make sense that "Extenuating circumstances" isn't linked to "Attenuante". I was trying to fix this, but it seems that since "Attenuante" is already linked to this item Q3629141 (which I don't understand what it is, sorry, I'm kinda new to this) I can't link it to what I believe is the correct term. I point out that from italian wiki there is no link to "other languages" for "Attenuante". Thanks for help! --Jacoposki (talk) 21:32, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It seems, that Russian term "Стакан торгового терминала" refers to the same thing, as English term "Order book". --Vikasatkin (talk) 02:45, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to be some overlap between the two items. --Del_♉sion23 (talk) 22:43, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure which are talking about the class and which the ship itself. The en.wp article is obviously more about the ship. --Izno (talk) 03:50, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The item qualitative inorganic analysis (Q902310) should be splitted: one item should contain the articles about the qualitative analysis in general (bg, cs, de, hu, ru, simple, sl, uk) and the other one about the qualitative inorganic analysis (ca, en, fr, id, no, pl). --Hkoala (talk) 07:43, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I believe the Freikörperkultur article should link to the German Freikörperkultur article. I guess I'm getting an error because of linking of Naturism to the German Freikörperkultur site. Kdammers (talk) 05:33, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kdammers: To which objects are you refering to? --Zuphilip (talk) 13:05, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Article links between english and german language are wrong. Q5988006 (strike and dip) should be connected to "Streichen" instead of to "Fallen". And Q1195438 (dip slope) should be linked to "Fallen" instead of to "Streichen". This is beeing very confusing for people who are iterested in the geology.

probably relink in Wikivoyage.--GZWDer (talk) 16:19, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Two groups. One seems to be flat-category for all women (Q8722872 for cs). Second should be normal category about women (for cs Category:Women (Q15632285))--JAn Dudík (talk) 11:22, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There are three articles about Cannibalization in English. One is about C in marketing, the next is about C in fiction and the last one about C of machine parts. There also is a disambiguation page, which (unfortunately) is also disambiguating man-eating cannibals etc.

The articles in all the other languages linked at Q1154300 are either about marketing (:ar and :ko), about machine parts (:pl) or both (:nl, :it, :de). None (except the English one) is about fiction.

Therefore I would like to change Q1154300 to link to en:Cannibalization (with or without an additional #Cannibalization), and rename it afterwards, but wikidata will not let me, as the disambiguation seems to be occupied by Cannibal (Q59857).

In my opinion, having this bunch of articles in English is correct, as most articles are quite detailed. Also, not having a bunch of articles in the other languages seems right, as right now, they are not so detailed (also, I guess not all usages of Cannibalization are valid in all of the other languages, eg in German you would rather say "Plagiarism" than "Cannibalization of fiction"). So I give up. --Vwm (talk) 18:13, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo dear problemsolvers! maybe the two items could simply be merged, but exactly there is the oil- and gasfield en:Prirazlomnoye field and the building de:Priraslomnaja-platform. Two different details in our natural and man-made environment. So both items should be described a little bit better, links between both items maybe better than a merge, wrong sorted articles should be moved to Priraslomnaja Q14936000 (to move the platform for recycling or for usage in greenpeace-gazprom-whalewatching to reach a longterm economical and ecological bonus is here not possible, unfortunately, global thinking may find real renewable solutions). Is it possible to connect articles by REDIRECTS in Wikidata, so in en-WP the existing REDIRECT en:Prirazlomnaya platform to en:Prirazlomnoye field#Development should be used; and vice versa the (not written) REDIRECT de:Priraslomnoje oilfield (to de:Priraslomnaja platform and similar articles in the other WP-projects. If direct Wikidata-REDIRECTS are not possible, are old interwikilinks to Redirects a possible solution to link articles? --LudwigSebastianMicheler (talk) 23:25, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There are may different national forms of Limited Liability Companies, e.g. Gesellschaft mit beschränkter Haftung (Q460178), société à responsabilité limitée (Q15091621), Sociedad limitada (Q15648901), società a responsabilità limitata (Q15648878). The above item mixes as far as I can tell articles that discuss LLCs from different countries with articles that deal only with the American form. --S.K. (talk) 16:51, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

--210.239.48.141 03:11, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

--Q574291 is about the definition of the term "backlight" but holds interwiki's to "TV that uses this technique" (Retroiluminación LED, Lysdiode-bagbelyst LCD-skærm), standard LED-TV and backlight itself (Rétroéclairage, Hintergrundbeleuchtung). This item should only be connected to the concept of backlight itself. Q12810597 and Q1797988 should be merged to form one item to articles about LED-TV's and another item should be created to connect to "Backlit LED-TV's". Something like that anyway :/ EvilFreD (talk) 06:39, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

On the french wikipedia, there is two articles : one for the island (Île de Sein, Q228472) and one for the commune (Île-de-Sein Q13416868) but on WikiData everything was a bit mixed up. Right now, the island is mark as the commune… --VIGNERON (talk) 20:41, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Is there something beyond weight-lifting? --Infovarius (talk) 04:11, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Strange but there is according to dewiki de:Schwerathletik, etwiki et:Raskejõustik, itwiki it:Atletica pesante and ndswiki nds:Swoorathletik (4 small articles). Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 12:05, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

(Sorry - I'm new in the interwiki subject :) Problem:
In enwiki 'PCB' and 'Perfboard' are separate subjects. (The same sems to be valid for French.)
In dewiki there is only 1 subject covering both:
"Leiterplatte" equals "PCB",
"Leiterplatte#Experimentierplatinen" includes the perfect equivalent of Perfboard: "Lochrasterplatine" (which currently seems not to allow for a direct reference).
As it is, it would be helpful to have "Perfboard" linked to "Leiterplatte#Experimentierplatinen" - which is currently not possible.

--Nouill (talk) 18:00, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Differing terminologies have left some issues with interlanguage links. For example, the es.wikipedia page for Q13266 is wikipedia:es:Galleta con chispas de chocolate (specifically discussing those pastries with chocolate chips) because the page for Q13270 is already wikipedia:es:Galleta (these pastries in general). See wikipedia:en:Talk:Cookie#German Wikipedia link for more information. --Anon126 (talk) 20:20, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Little_Sammy_Sneeze

http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Little_Sammy_Sneeze --89.31.118.161 04:22, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

These two items are the same. --130.88.141.34 12:05, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The item should be splitted in two: some languages refer to the order Platycopida (ceb, hu) and some other to the Cytherellidae family of it (ca, en, no, ssv, war) --Hkoala (talk) 18:43, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merged with Cytherellidae (Q1237194) by 분당선M. Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 12:22, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There was two articles on the French Wikipedia but we merge them. There is already only one article in the German Wikipedia. The tricky thing is : there is one location but two protection monument historique inscrit (Q10387575) one in 1979 and one other in 1996. What is the best way to deal with this case :

• merging Penchâteau protohistoric camp (Q1033174) and Penchâteau protohistoric camp (Q2935229)

or

• creating a third item that regroup the two others ?

Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 12:53, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Q820606 and Q11714007 are the same person and should be merged.

--Rekrutacja (talk) 20:51, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merged. Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 12:16, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There is a conflict between these disambiguation pages based on words for "English". --130.88.141.34 09:15, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In Japanese, 愛人 refer to sexual partners (especially "extramarital affair") and it is not equivalent to the Chinese "情侶", which means "couples" or "lover" (恋人 in Japanese and Significant others in English Wikipedia)

In short, ja:愛人 should not be linked with zh:愛人 (since they have very different meaning.) while en:Significant_other should be liked with :ja:恋人 and :zh:愛人.

--TX55 (talk) 00:53, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Czech and French seem to have separate articles for the list and the explanation, and other languages don't. It's unclear which of these many of the pages linked from list of prime ministers of the Czech Republic (Q390415) are about. --Yair rand (talk) 07:30, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, there should be an interlanguage link between the german "Verbindungstechnik" article and the english "fastener". But the wiki wont let me do this. i do not have the time to figure out why but it would be a great and necessary addition if someone could create that link please.--85.179.9.56 10:47, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is in fact the same article, but I cannot find a way to tell this to the "add language" system... Thanks in advance for your help! DavidBourguignon (talk) 17:44, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@DavidBourguignon: Have a look at Help:Merge and ping me back if you've got any questions about it. --Izno (talk) 18:25, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[1] should be linking to [2], not [3] nor [4]. Unfortunately, I cannot delete the link to the Farsi Wikipedia from Ya`fūr (Q8046257) in order to add it to Duldul (Q15616311). --Tamarod Çapuling (talk) 07:48, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Both referring to the same "Marburg virus". Not sure how the link to the English "Marburg virus disease" page got involved, but this seems to be the cause of the conflict. --Antheii (talk) 11:04, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

All the articles are about the same animal. The difference is that one item describes genus, and another describes species. — 89.179.33.125 12:31, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]