Diergaardt v. Namibia
| Iri |
legal case (en)  |
|---|---|
J.G.A. Diergaardt (mutumin Kyaftin na Rehoboth Baster Community) et al. v. Namibia (No. 760/1997) (2000) shari'ar ce da Kwamitin Kare Hakkin Dan Adam na Majalisar Dinkin Duniya ya yanke shawarar.
Karin da aka yi
[gyara sashe | gyara masomin]Wakilan Rehoboth Baster Community sun shigar da korafi na hukuma game da zargin keta Mataki na 1 (yancin cin gashin kai), 14 (daidaitawa a gaban kotuna), 17 (yancin shiga cikin rayuwar jama'a), 25 (bancin nuna bambanci) da 27 (yancin ƙarancin) a ƙarƙashin Yarjejeniyar Kasa da Kasa kan 'Yancin Bil'adama da Siyasa (ICCPR), wanda ke aiki tun 1976.
Ra'ayoyin kwamitin
[gyara sashe | gyara masomin]Kwamitin ya gano cewa ba shi da iko a kan zargin keta Mataki na 1, kuma ba a nuna wani keta Mataki ba na 14, 17, 25 da 27 ta hanyar gaskiyar da ke gabansa.
Game da Mataki na 26, kwamitin ya sami keta doka, yana riƙe da cewa
"Masu rubutun sun nuna cewa jam'iyyar Jiha ta umarci ma'aikatan gwamnati kada su amsa rubuce-rubucen marubuta ko sadarwa ta baki tare da hukumomi a cikin Harshen Afrikaans, koda kuwa suna da cikakkiyar ikon yin hakan. Wadannan umarnin da ke hana amfani da Afrikaans ba su da alaƙa da bayar da takardun jama'a amma har ma da tattaunawar tarho. Idan babu wani martani daga jam'iyyar Jihar kwamitin dole ne ya ba da nauyin da ya dace ga zargin marubuta cewa zagaye a cikin tambaya an yi niyya don yin amfani da su ne da su.
Membobin Abdalfattah Amor, Nisuke Ando, P. N. Bhagwati, Lord Colville, Maxwell Yalden da Rajsoomer Lallah sun gabatar da ra'ayoyi huɗu masu banbanci a kan Mataki na 26; membobin Elizabeth Evatt, Eckart Klein, David Kretzmer, Cecilia Medina Quiroga da Martin Scheinin sun gabatar da Ra'ayoyi biyu masu jituwa a kan wannan batun. Elizabeth Evatt da Cecilia Medina Quiroga sun gabatar da ra'ayi iri ɗaya a kan Mataki na 27.