Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Lilmae
Appearance
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
request links: main • edit • links • history • watch Filed: 17:23, 28 October 2008 (UTC) |
- Lilmae (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Danargh (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- G:
- Supporting evidence: These two accounts were created 4 minutes apart and each of them has made very similar vandalistic edits to Arthur (TV series). THough I'm not quite prepared to block them as vandal-only accts, I would like to know whether or not they are in fact the same person, or one is a sleeper of the other. Thanks...Gladys J Cortez 17:23, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
- Clerk note: Is it mere curiosity or do you think there might be foul play involving more accounts? If it is not the latter, I suggest you consider them as throwaway accounts :) -- lucasbfr talk 14:07, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
- I was actually more concerned that they were the harbingers of a bigger sock-nest, yes. If you don't see any evidence of that, feel free to drop it; I've got no personal attachment to this case, so I wouldn't fuss if it was dismissed. THanks! Gladys J Cortez 14:15, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
- Declined no evidence of abusive sockpuppetry. Should some arise, please bring it back here. -- Avi (talk) 14:56, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
- I was actually more concerned that they were the harbingers of a bigger sock-nest, yes. If you don't see any evidence of that, feel free to drop it; I've got no personal attachment to this case, so I wouldn't fuss if it was dismissed. THanks! Gladys J Cortez 14:15, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.