Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Aido2002

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

(Final 1/12/0) ended 14:34, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

Aido2002 (talk · contribs) – I have been a user for quite a long time now, and I think I'm ready to be an admin. I have made many, many edits, always creating each to the best of my ability and knowledge (and thrown some humor into the talk pages, whenever it is appropriate)I'd be great for the job! User:Aido2002 20:25, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: I accept. User:Aido2002 20:26, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Support

1. Editwriter2300 20:47, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

   Editwriter2300's first and only edit so far. DarthVader 13:06, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose

1. Oppose Spam for rfa [1], <500 edits, this page not formatted correctly, not listed on opening date on main rfa page etc. --pgk^(talk) 20:32, 5 June 2006 (UTC) changed to Extremely strong oppose following this edit --pgk^(talk) 20:47, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
   • and now this [2]
     • And this [3] --pgk^(talk) 20:55, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
2. Strongest possible oppose per Pgk. --digital_me^(t/c) 21:00, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
3. Oppose, sorry, but I don't think you're ready. 300 edits isn't much, and you've shown you're not quite mature enough by the spam and removing of votes, and the way you say you'll block "annoying" spammers.. -- 9cds^(talk) 05:56, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
4. Oppose and suggest immediate cancellation of RFA as bad-faith selfnom. NSLE _(T+C) at 12:11 UTC (2006-06-06)
5. Oppose per Pgk, please withdraw your RFA. --Terence Ong 12:23, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
6. Oppose per Pgk, that is unacceptable behavior. Plus malformed RfA and very low edit count. Gwernol 12:32, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
7. Oppose because of edits to RfA. Stephen B Streater 12:40, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
8. Oppose per Pgk. DarthVader 12:55, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
9. Strong Oppose One of your proud pages is a red link. Yanksox 13:25, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
10. Oppose, fails 1FA. - Mailer Diablo 13:37, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
11. Oppose Per Pgk. FoerstH2
12. Speedy Oppose, please try again later. Naconkantari 14:08, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral

Comments

• See Aido2002's edit summary usage with Mathbot's tool.

Questions for the candidate
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:

1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? Please check out Category:Wikipedia backlog, and read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.

A: I would, of course, make sure pages are factual and fix those in need of editing. In addition, I would ban annoying valdalizers, and revert their destructive work. Lastly, I will keep protected pages in order and optimal.

2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?

A: Well, I would have to say I am very pleased with much of my work, but mostly, my work on the page of my hometown, Marlboro Township, New Jersey. I added pictures that should be there, added nessecary details, and fixed errors. Also, I am pleased with my work on Cingular Wiereless, and AT&T.

3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

A: Well, I have gotten slightly annoyed with users in the past, but I just try to calmly and politely address them about whatever the problem is. In the future, I will aim to be even more polite in my responses, and swift in my actions when they are important (such as reverting vandalism by the user), especially if I become a sysop.

The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.