Jump to content

Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2009 August 3

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Green tickY Your reversion was correct and listing it here allowed me to purge the history. Thanks. CactusWriter | needles 12:23, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Green tickY - Reverted to clean version (again). Cleaned history and added a cleaned tag to the talk page. CactusWriter | needles 12:33, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Green tickY - Files with CV problems should be reported to WP:PUI. I switched templates and listed a report at PUI CactusWriter | needles 13:19, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Green tickY - No response from contributor. Article deleted. CactusWriter | needles 11:52, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Green tickY - Thanks for watching this. The website does state text is released by GNU free documentation license (GFDL) and CC-BY-SA. I've left a message on the talk page concerning the other issues about NPOV, OR and RS. CactusWriter | needles 12:12, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Green tickY- deleted the copied text, as well as additional text that was copied from here. Left message for contributor. CactusWriter | needles 11:01, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Green tickY - deleted multiple counts of copy-pastes from various sites. CactusWriter | needles 13:35, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Green tickY Text was revised. CactusWriter | needles 10:11, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Green tickY - Copyvio text removed and history cleaned. CactusWriter | needles 10:16, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Green tickY -- No copyright violation found. Message left for contributor concerning other issues of RS and COI. CactusWriter | needles 10:47, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Checked - There was blatant copyright infringement from creation of article. This website article predates WP article. A complete rewrite would be necessary for article to be maintained, but requires huge quantities of references not to be a BLP violation. Deleted the article. CactusWriter | needles 14:49, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]