Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taos Institute

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 18:34, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Taos Institute (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It exists, but it doesn't meet WP:ORG or WP:GNG. Nearly all sources I could find are primary. No suitable ATD. Boleyn (talk) 06:49, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 07:01, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 07:01, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment I suggest we add this nomination to the delsort lists for behavioural science, education, psychiatry and social science (not sure how to do that once a nomination has been posted). The fact that it offers a Masters and PhD programme would surely indicate pretty strongly that it is notable. The reason for not clearly !voting 'keep' is that it is a group of practitioners who will have come and gone over the last 25+ years, and without knowing who they all are, it is effectively impossible for me to pick through all the papers, citations and refs to be certain which ones are genuinely independent and for this same reason, not an article I'm going to try to improve. Mccapra (talk) 12:11, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom and WP:SIGCOV specifically. This is not the same as the notable Taos Art Colony in New Mexico. Granting degrees is not a reason to keep. This does not appear to be accredited. Please ping me if you find anything. Bearian (talk) 17:05, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.