Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sigma Beauty

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Izno (talk) 01:41, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sigma Beauty

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotion of a company. Fails notability. WP:ROUTINE Priyanjali singh (talk) 08:34, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Priyanjali singh (talk) 08:34, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Priyanjali singh (talk) 08:34, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete: Seems like WP:TOOSOON. Nearlyevil665 (talk) 08:48, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Organization passes WP:GNG and WP:NCORP as per the available citations. However, I would be eager to know SamHolt6 view on this as he has been dealing with this entity's page in the past. I may change my stand to match his decision if his assessment goes against my current vote. -Hatchens (talk) 17:29, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
delete it's all basic mill "coverage", pr and announcements. Praxidicae (talk) 13:26, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 01:41, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep - can be treated as a stub (WP:STUB) article b'cuz it is one of the few well-known cruelty-free beauty brands Nathan811 (talk) 07:19, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If it's well known, you should have no problem finding independent coverage beyond PR puffery. There are thousands of cruelty-free brands, it doesn't make them notable. Praxidicae (talk) 18:41, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Praxidicae. Being "one of the few well-known cruelty-free beauty brands" does not automatically make something notable (t · c) buidhe 18:12, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.