Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parsine
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Media of Iran. Page history preserved for use in a possible Merge. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:42, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Parsine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Can't seem to find any independent, reliable sources that cover the subject. The only sources are from the website itself. Only found this article from The Guardian which only mentions that the website published newspaper photographs and is a non-governmental website. Fails WP:GNG and WP:WEB, more specifically, Wikipedia:Notability (web)#Criteria. -- Luke (Talk) 17:56, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately, there's not much content in English about Persian News Sites. But isn't that enough for a site to be among first 20 popular news sites in Iran to be introduced in WikiPedia? --Hecatcher 18:15, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of News-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:01, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:02, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:02, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to Media of Iran (or other suitable subtopic), per WP:NWEB. I found 2 further refs mentioning the site.[1][2]. -- Trevj (talk) 14:04, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dori ☾Talk ☯ Contribs☽ 22:02, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —cyberpower ChatOnline 13:28, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.