Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicola Twohig

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 20:40, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nicola Twohig

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No significant coverage found when searching "Nicola Twohig", "Nikki Twohig" or "Nicky Twohig". "Nicky Twohig" gets the best results but all, without exceptions, are just trivial mentions. WP:SPORTBASIC requires significant in-depth coverage from multiple independent WP:RS. Source analysis to follow. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:51, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Women, Football, Ireland, and England. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:51, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Source	Independent?	Significant coverage?	Count source toward GNG?
Source assessment table:
https://www.rovers.co.uk/page/LadiesProfiles/0,,10303~1155237,00.html	Her employer	? Cannot be retrieved but clearly would not have been SIGCOV	✘ No
https://web.archive.org/web/20071114163853/http://www.clitheroeadvertiser.co.uk/rovers/Lakeland-runs-rule-over-new.3412764.jp		One brief quote	✘ No
https://web.archive.org/web/20100902062742/http://www.rovers.co.uk/page/LadiesNews/0,,10303~2132840,00.html	Her employer	Basic match report coverage	✘ No
https://web.archive.org/web/20120916231018/http://www.rovers.co.uk/page/LadiesNews/0,,10303~2283369,00.html	Her employer	? Not retrievable but seems unlikely to have been SIGCOV. The title implies that it's a match report.	✘ No
https://web.archive.org/web/20090115102420/http://www.munsterspride.com/defaultarticle.php?cArticlePath=150_166		Two trivial mentions in the texts and mentioned in the squad list	✘ No
https://www.proquest.com/docview/426807095/1526176A2E4E41A2PQ/1?accountid=196403		Trivial mention	✘ No
https://www.lancashiretelegraph.co.uk/sport/1969505.blackburn-rovers-ladies-3-doncaster-belles-2/		Mentioned once	✘ No
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/19079006		Mentioned once	✘ No
https://www.lancashiretelegraph.co.uk/sport/11823325.blackburn-rovers-ladies-lancashire-fa-womens-challenge-trophy-final/		Mentioned once	✘ No
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:58, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:50, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 19:02, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails WP:SPORTBASIC. Spleodrach (talk) 10:37, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.