Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kanchan Kamble

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 09:10, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kanchan Kamble

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

BLP of a city mayor in India. Though the city is large I don’t believe governing it makes a person notable. US equivalents would be Fresno or Tucson. I don’t see any in-depth coverage in English. Mccapra (talk) 09:25, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and India. Mccapra (talk) 09:25, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Maharashtra-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:48, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails WP:GNG. Youknow? (talk) 13:35, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NBIO. A local city politician who has not received significant press coverage. The politician has not made a significant impact or achievement to be worthy of notice. Sources are poor on the page. Source 1 is 404 error, source 2, 3 and 4 are passing mention. Source 5 is unreliable YouTube source. RangersRus (talk) 13:29, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. As always, mayors (regardless of the city's size) are not "inherently" notable just for existing as mayors — they can have articles that contain meaningfully substantive and reliably sourced content about the person's political impact (specific things they did, specific projects they spearheaded, specific effects their leadership had on the development of the city, etc.), but are not automatically entitled to keep articles that functionally amount to "he is a mayor who exists, the end". But that's all this is, and the contextless list of unfootnoted "referencing" does not provide enough to suggest that the article can be expanded very much, and basically just verifies that he exists without providing substantive coverage or analysis about his work. Bearcat (talk) 15:52, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.