Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeonghan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 15:39, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jeonghan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) (Wen Junhui)

they (Jeonghan and Wen Junhui) has no significant solo work outside of their group Seventeen (band). They did not have a notable solo career in any field.I believe the page should be removed. (Pikhmikh (talk) 00:18, 1 September 2015 (UTC))[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. 15:03, 4 September 2015 (UTC) Donottroll (talk) 15:06, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. 15:03, 4 September 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Donottroll (talk • contribs)

Strong Delete There is nothing on the page and absolutely no reason to keep it since he has no notable solo work.Peachywink (talk) 03:09, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The IMBd used as source for Wen Junhui was changed to a more reliable one which is the Hong Kong Movie DataBase. Also more valid references are provided to support Wen Junhui's works. Wjh610 (talk) 9:44, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

That's hardly convincing to keep the article as it needs better coverage for a separate article. SwisterTwister talk 01:57, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or redirect to band and protect as this will likely be retsrated and there are simply no signs of improvement with the best results being this. SwisterTwister talk 01:57, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 September 14. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 02:18, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment This is Jeonghan. I understand that his page is difficult to keep as he is still new to the industry so only few articles are made about him. But it's Wen Junhui's page I'm trying to save. If you only use 'Wen Junhui', articles about other Junhui's are shown instead. But if you use the Chinese character of his name (文俊辉) you'll have this or this. He was a child actor in China so most of the articles about him are in Chinese. Also I got some of the information from here. Wjh610 (talk) 11:03, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, non-notable subjects, seemingly promotional articles not supported by reliable sources. Baidu Baike is not a reliable source. Citobun (talk) 05:48, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete because she was not famous for herself. For now, EXID is notable group in Korea and she was one memeber. So in her page is not necessary — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pkh409 (talk • contribs) 02:41, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete because she was not famous for herself. For now, EXID is notable group in Korea and she was one memeber. So in her page is not necessary - You made a mistake. This discussion is for Jeonghan, Seventeen(band). But what you write is EXID Jeonghwa.

Jeonghan, the member of Seventeen is not famous in Koera. Seventeen debuted May 26, 2015. Just 4 months before. In Korea wikipedia, all members of the Seventeen is linked together at '세븐틴(음악 그룹)'. Non of each members are registered individually at Wikipedia.--Rhee In Joon (talk) 02:55, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no indication in searches of these members independently meeting the notability criteria. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:18, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.