Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Campaign finance evolution in 2010

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Vanamonde (Talk) 05:03, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Campaign finance evolution in 2010

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It looks like an essay. It only cites rulings. There's no reliable secondary sourcing. Relevant content can be moved to other relevant campaign finance pages. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 02:42, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. It is an essay. A merge to, e.g., Campaign finance in the United States would not make sense since it's all OR. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 03:27, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. - hako9 (talk) 08:05, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. - hako9 (talk) 08:05, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. - hako9 (talk) 08:05, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per AleatoryPonderings - it's an essay and redundant to other articles. power~enwiki (π, ν) 04:15, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.