User talk:Chipmunkdavis

Archives

Shiny stuff Balkan, Caucasus, SEAsia, Malaysia, Philippines, other countries Nature, Geography, Miscellaneous Notices, Chitchat, Office

Welcome! If you post on this page, I will respond on this page. If I post on your talk page, I will have it watchlisted for the duration of the conversation (and possibly longer!), but please feel free to ping me if I appear to have missed something.

Hello CMD. Can you please check the following revisions of Philippines? They appear to include improper synthesis, or the claims therein are not directly supported by the cited sources. Moreover, the text contains detail better included in the child articles, and it has lengthened the article prose size. If possible, could you please revise the content (maybe the previous revisions before these could be restored, or the new claims are further summarized).

• https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Philippines&diff=1169811722&oldid=1169786551
• https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Philippines&diff=1172197392&oldid=1171184226

Thanks. Sanglahi86 (talk) 14:17, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Chipmonk for making your simplifications. The last user is some sort of highly qualified 'scientist' from USA who thinks that the ancient codes of centuries ago have some relevance to present science and so has been attempting to pervert this page with his high status perspective of whatever it is that he feels makes himself relevant to this world wide standard. He has been abusing his position for many years and so I am thankful to see someone else who has taken the time to correct the confusion that he has caused. Changes were made impossible through his convoluted methods of presenting information, when in fact it is or should be a simple affair with no need to mention anything about the three countries in the world who refuse to accept and implement the standards of the other 180+ nations.

I will support you should you wish to have someone who can take the time to keep these wikipages open and honest. I wish you the best of luck kk (talk) 13:35, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi kk, I am unfamiliar with the editing history of the page, my edits were mostly to fix some obvious tangential items and areas of duplication. Perhaps you can add your suggestions for improvement to the article talkpage? Best, CMD (talk) 02:36, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there & good day! I've been working on the Penang article for the past few weeks now & nominating it for GA. I was wondering if you're keen to help in its assessment? Thanks! hundenvonPG (talk) 02:55, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi HundenvonPenang, this is good news. I have enough involvement in the article that I think it would be best for someone else to review. However, a quick look. The sentence/paragraph "Meanwhile, George Town had a population of 794,313..." is unsourced, and a few more sources are clearly absent in Architecture, Sports, and Transportation. There are also a few too many images which some reviewers do bring up, but it is not a GA issue so other items may be more important. I'll watchlist the review. Best, CMD (talk) 08:36, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the feedback! Making the needed changes now. Also trying to unclutter the article by removing photos, though personally I'm rather undecided on which other photos to take off. hundenvonPG (talk) 10:15, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there @Chipmunkdavis: Need advice/assistance. It appears my nomination of Penang for GA status prompted some IP address to accuse me of basically being a sockpuppet (in User talk:BlueMoonset#Current GAN on Penang). Utterly preposterous! I had zero idea of that last user who did the sockpuppeting, I only learnt of such issues now, and I had made some contributions on other areas too (eg. Oppo phones and Napoleon (2023 film)).

And by that logic, the Penang article cannot be improved and nominated for GA in spite of all the work that has gone in? Certainly this accusation was made in bad faith. Is there any action I can take? hundenvonPG (talk) 12:05, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There's no action you need to take, presuming you are not a sockpuppet. Just let it work itself out. CMD (talk) 16:12, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks CMD! And Merry Christmas. hundenvonPG (talk) 16:15, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CMD: just a note that a third IP has showed up at my talk page to attempt to raise my suspicions regarding the new Penang GAN, presumably because I was the one who delisted both of the articles back when the original sockpuppetry was finally uncovered a few years after the articles had been passed. Not sure whether you blocked the other two IPs after you deleted the original posts from my talk page, but it seems clear that they're somehow faking the widely variant addresses. Thanks for whatever you can do. BlueMoonset (talk) 05:46, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@BlueMoonset: These are all throwaway proxy IPs so they'll keep changing, the simplest path is to just revert and ignore them. Best, CMD (talk) 02:32, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. Will do. BlueMoonset (talk) 04:50, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I saw you comment in the edit history. It could be worse. Somehow I hit 158 (see here). I'm going to have to make a conscious decision to get up at the crack of dawn to finish. Have a userbox. --evrik ^(talk) 14:20, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much evrik, well-appreciated, did not know that userbox existed. I don't think I am going to actively try to achieve more, although the GA review one seems a good long-term citizen plan. Now, how to get another i into Niue Nukutuluea Multiple-Use Marine Park... CMD (talk) 14:39, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hah! When I discovered the page, I had already achieved five. With a little focus I completed four. I'm going to finish four more, and I'm done. Maybe. :-) I may never complete the clock one. --evrik ^(talk) 14:46, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Chipmunkdavis. Thank you for your work on Asphendou Cave petroglyphs. Another editor, Aszx5000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Very well made article - just checking the other articles you have created/overhauled, and I think you should be autopatrolled? thanks

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Aszx5000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Aszx5000 (talk) 16:25, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Chipmunkdavis, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the autopatrolled user right to your account. This means that pages you create will automatically be marked as 'reviewed', and no longer appear in the new pages feed. Autopatrolled is assigned to prolific creators of articles, where those articles do not require further review, and may have been requested on your behalf by someone else. It doesn't affect how you edit; it is used only to manage the workload of new page patrollers.

Since the articles you create will no longer be systematically reviewed by other editors, it is important that you maintain the high standard you have achieved so far in all your future creations. Please also try to remember to add relevant WikiProject templates, stub tags, categories, and incoming links to them, if you aren't already in the habit; user scripts such as Rater and StubSorter can help with this. As you have already shown that you have a strong grasp of Wikipedia's core content policies, you might also consider volunteering to become a new page patroller yourself, helping to uphold the project's standards and encourage other good faith article writers.

Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! —Femke 🐦 (talk) 10:59, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was wondering if you had any thoughts on the GAN for Botswana and whether it's ready. I'm reaching out to you because you did the article's peer review for the nominator a few weeks ago. They've also nominated The arts which I'm not too sure about, and they've received several complaints on their talk page about their reviewing, including one from myself and apparently one from you. I've also spoken with AirshipJungleman29 about the editor's activity at GAN as he worked with them at WP:GANMENTOR. Sorry for roping you in like this, but I still have concerns and I'm wondering if they're justified. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 04:15, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Thebiguglyalien: Thanks for reaching out, no need to apologise. The nominator is enthusiastic about improving Botswana-related articles, I have not encountered them on more general topics like The arts so don't have a comment on that at the moment. I did raise that talkpage question you mention, and also recently I think caused a withdrawal at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of general elections in Botswana/archive2 (although I was trying to be specific on improvements that would integrate the current text, with the caveat I'm not very experienced at FLs I don't think it was beyond improving to pass). These are two separate domains however, we might have issues with reviewing, but that doesn't necessarily mean issues in writing.

Specifically on the Botswana article, I meant what I said about it being better than many country articles. The main Politics section for example looks at a first read as very well done. While not all of my points were actioned (not that they all have to, of course), substantial improvements were made in response to my PR. There are comments I would still make regarding weight and MOS:PARA, but I wouldn't say it's a rushed nomination. (I have not evaluated GACR2 at all mind.) Are there any specific concerns I might help look into? CMD (talk) 10:09, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the Botswana article, I can only speak to the History and Politics sections. I'm the one who wrote the politics section, and it wasn't in great shape until I redid it by summarizing what I wrote on the associated child article. And like I said at the PR, I'm working on History of Botswana and the main article's history section seems way off. I edit regularly in this area and have interacted with this editor a few times. My concern is more that they might be biting off way more than they can competently handle as a brand new editor (even I wouldn't be bold enough to nominate one of the project's most core articles like The arts at GAN), especially given their history with reviewing, and the fact that their last GAN was justifiably quickfailed. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 19:55, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Thebiguglyalien: If you're asking me if they're being very bold and perhaps over-enthusiastic, I agree. There is an obvious pattern with many nominations, consistent with the nomination statement at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of general elections in Botswana/archive2 and the opening of Wikipedia:Peer review/Botswana/archive1. The editor has also spent a lot of time reworking Wikipedia:WikiProject Botswana, unfortunately otherwise a dead project like many are. On GANs, there has been some clerking that is feels unusual (eg. Talk:Bath City F.C./GA5). I also took a quick look at the Botswana nomination when it appeared, given that history. That said, I don't want to damp down too much on enthusiasm, I have not seen any particular issues regarding POV or similar (perhaps you know more?), and they are pleasant and collaborative. Do you have any particular paths forward in mind? The user has not responded to my talkpage question, so I feel a bit unsure of personally pursuing that there. CMD (talk) 01:56, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the 2024 Developing Countries WikiContest, Chipmunkdavis! The contest is now open for submissions. List your work at your submissions page to earn points. If you haven't done so already, please review the following:

• Got open nominations? List them at review requests.
• Looking for a topic to work on? Check out suggested articles and eligible reviews.
• Not sure if your article qualifies? See the guidelines for more information or contact a coordinator for verification.
• New to Wikipedia? Many experienced editors are part of this contest and willing to help; feel free to ask questions about the contest on the talk page.
• Know someone else who might be interested? Sign-ups remain open until 15 July, so don't hesitate to invite other editors!

On behalf of the coordinators, we hope you enjoy participating and wish you good luck! If you have any questions, please leave a message on the contest talk page or ask one of the coordinators: Ixtal (talk · contribs), sawyer777 (talk · contribs), or TechnoSquirrel69 (talk · contribs). (To unsubscribe from these updates, remove yourself from this list.) Sent via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 00:01, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I understand you to be inviting comment on how Wikipedia differentiates the terms Maritime Southeast Asia and Island Southeast Asia. I had a discussion on this at [1] (it has a bit of a slow start on being clear on what it is about). The conclusion I have made is that, outside Wikipedia, there are those working on the region that use ISEA and Maritime SEA interchangeably. There are others who do not, including Peter Bellwood and most who work in the biology and prehistory of the area. (You will see there is a derivative study of usages on a linked page, but that rather petered out.)

It seems to me that it is not Wikipedia's role to fix this terminological muddle, however disappointing it may be to see the precision of the English language subverted. The problems arise in the world outside Wikipedia. But I never really reached a conclusion to the discussion linked above. I would be interested to know your view on this. ThoughtIdRetired _TIR 07:56, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ThoughtIdRetired, I am not looking for comments on how Wikipedia differentiates the term. We have neatly sidestepped the issue, using Maritime Southeast Asia for the cultural/human space, and maintaining Malay Archipelago for the geographical archipelago (which also has its fair share of synonyms), thus never needing to use the term Island Southeast Asia. What I am looking for is sources on the terminological muddle. For whatever issues the previous source had, it is better than what has seemingly replaced it, which is an issue. CMD (talk) 09:06, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Noted. Island Southeast Asia seems to be the preferred usage in sources covering the subject areas of interest to me (early seafaring, biodiversity, etc. – because it is important in those fields to differentiate between islands and the coast of mainland Asia). I've just mentally flagged it as an issue in Wikipedia where I'll just go with the flow – because the sources I've seen, taken as a whole, show no consistency. I did try to find sources that had definitions; I contacted a few authors directly (e.g. Bellwood who was crystal clear on his own usage (always "ISEA" but including Taiwan) – but Watson Andaya never replied). Just out of curiosity, are you happy with the way Maritime Southeast Asia handles the terminology at the moment? ThoughtIdRetired _TIR 10:09, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think the current presentation there is great, but on the other hand it's not a well-developed article at all. I am not that familiar with seafaring scholarship, but regarding biodiversity I anecdotally agree with your experience that Island Southeast Asia or the traditional Malay Archipelago specifically exclude the mainland. CMD (talk) 10:22, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I noticed u reverted the changes I made on india bhutan relations. Them reasoning u gave was *seems sourced and no improvement* I want to say, I find removal of unnecessary information as improvement as well.because when I was reading that article it all seemed so irrelevant to the india bhutan relations. For example the mention about electricity prices from 4.32 to 4.11 and other random day to day news. It was all cluttered Also I removed 1972 row - reason no event actually took place to have a new column under 1972.

And no I'm not sourced MangoHuman (talk) 19:38, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This does not feel like an accurate summary of the edits in question, which removed quite broad information about the changes in the relationship between the two countries. CMD (talk) 00:06, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Dili you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Cambalachero -- Cambalachero (talk) 15:41, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sacred Cod has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Cpotisch (talk) 13:37, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

^Complex/_Rational 00:03, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

^Complex/_Rational 00:04, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Dili you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Dili and Talk:Dili/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Cambalachero -- Cambalachero (talk) 14:23, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Dili you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Dili for comments about the article, and Talk:Dili/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Cambalachero -- Cambalachero (talk) 13:23, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

no reason was provided [[2]] [[3]] Astropulse (talk) 05:36, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i was just trying to organize the content. please revert it Astropulse (talk) 05:37, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

They were caught up, but looking at them now I don't understand why the oldest history is being separated from later history and merged with the parliamentary system text. CMD (talk) 06:08, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i didnt know where to put it. it was too small to be own its own. but i think noe first 3 para are in correct order Astropulse (talk) 06:12, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It was best where it was. There are now three separate paragraphs of a four-paragraph lead in some way covering History, which is only one of the many level 2 sections of the article. CMD (talk) 06:23, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

what if we move below text to end of first para. i think it is not really related to 2nd para.

Israel is located in a region known historically as Canaan, Palestine, and the Holy Land. In antiquity, it was home to Canaanite city-states, then the kingdoms of Israel and Judah, and is referred to as the Land of Israel in Jewish tradition. Situated at a continental crossroad, the region was then ruled by various empires. Astropulse (talk) 06:30, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The region part might align with the geography parts of the first paragraph, but I'm not seeing how the rest does. Various empires is the lead in to the British Empire prior to independence. CMD (talk) 07:25, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! I noticed you just added your name to the PH History taskforce. Which is a weird coincidence/really cool since I'm trying to gauge right now if there's any interest in reviving the thing lol (figuring out how to run a project comes after). There's a discussion in here if you'd like to drop by, and thanks for the interest! NyanThousand (talk) 14:03, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

NyanThousand A worthy initiative, I have been involved in some general discussions about Wikiprojects recently, and it reminded me of the PH History taskforce as I converted it to a taskforce a few years ago, and I did some cleanup on the Spanish period article yesterday. Best, CMD (talk) 14:21, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The 2024 Developing Countries WikiContest has now been running for a month, and we've already seen some momentous improvement in the quality of many articles about underrepresented subjects! So far, our top-scoring participants are:

• Magentic Manifestations (submissions) – 338 points, mainly from nine good articles. He's a contender for the "most submissions for a single country" specialty award, with nine submissions for India.
• Arconning (submissions) – 305 points, including from six seasonally-appropriate Olympics-related good articles.
• Generalissima (submissions) – 290 points, the bulk from her featured article about Greenlandic interpreter Qalaherriaq and two China-related good articles.
• AirshipJungleman29 (submissions) – 245 points, mostly from the achievement of bringing Genghis Khan to featured status.
• Thebiguglyalien (submissions) – 144 points from three good articles, including two about Kiribati elections, and four reviews of good article nominees.

Looking for ways to climb up the leaderboard yourself? Help out your fellow participants by answering a few review requests, particularly the older entries. Several more nominations needing attention are listed at eligible reviews, and highlighed entries receive a 1.5× multiplier! The coordinators would like to extend a special thanks to Thebiguglyalien (submissions) for his commitment to keeping these review pages up to date.

If you have any questions, please leave a message on the contest talk page or ask one of the coordinators: Ixtal (talk · contribs), sawyer777 (talk · contribs), or TechnoSquirrel69 (talk · contribs). (To unsubscribe from these updates, remove yourself from this list.) Sent via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 14:24, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I see you've contributed a lot to Culture of the Philippines, would you maybe interested in a taskforce on oral tradition? No worries if not Kowal2701 (talk) 20:55, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

	The Malaysia WikiProject Newsletter
Issue 50 • June 2024 • About the Newsletter
WikiProject Malaysia would like to send all of our members happy Gawai Dayak and Eid al-Adha 2024. We wish you happy editing in Wikipedia and keep on making WikiProject Malaysia better. Congratulations for Wong Sau Ying which was promoted to good article (on 23 June 2024). Statistics on the WikiProject progress and improvement: Subject namespaces: 56,382, an increase of 156 from last month Articles: 18,484, an increase of 51 from last month Featured articles: 22, an increase of 1 from last month Good articles: 98, an increase of 1 from last month Stub-class Malaysia articles: 8,920, a decrease of 5 from last month Place-related articles without geographic coordinate: 1,015, a decrease of 14 from last month Active members: 43, an increase of 1 from last month Articles needing infoboxes: 145, a decrease of 2 from last month
WikiProject Malaysia Statistics There are currently about 56,382 subject namespaces attributed to the project, including 18,484 articles. There are 22 featured articles, 98 good articles and 8,920 stub articles. The project currently has 43 active members.
Past Newsletter • Newsroom • Malaysia Noticeboard • Malaysia Portal
Newsletter written by Chongkian. You may opt-out of this monthly newsletter by removing your name here.

Greetings. In this RfC you mentioned "per FFF." What is that, please? -The Gnome (talk) 14:19, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry The Gnome, I was shorthanding the earlier contributor Firefangledfeathers. CMD (talk) 14:37, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I need you to help make additional suggestions on this article page, Biafra Referendum as you review it for indexing.

Welcome. Wår (talk) 06:49, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Wår, the article needs better background and contextualisation as it is not what is usually understood as a referendum. See for example 2014 Venetian independence referendum which feels a similar case. Best, CMD (talk) 07:14, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That was weird. It used to be fine in the past listing dates as normal, but I guess at some point the template got picky and forced the dates to be listed not in the American way? IDK, but I fixed those two pages you mentioned, thanks. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 19:12, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your corrections but I have undone one of your edits, explaining in the edit summary. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 11:17, 28 August 2024 Oh -- I meant to type "Undo" instead of "Undue". Sorry -- you have probably noticed that I am a really bad proofreader. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 11:26, 28 August 2024 (UTC)(UTC)[reply]

No need to explain here Wtmitchell, although explaining the typo makes it a lot clearer! CMD (talk) 11:42, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Developing Countries WikiContest has now been running for two months, and we've seen tremendous improvement in the encyclopedic coverage of several underrepresented areas from a wide range of editors! The coordinators would like to highlght some of the newer faces who have been making notable contributions in the contest, including but by no means limited to:

• Arconning (submissions) – 386 points, with several good articles primarily relating to the Olympics
• Vigilantcosmicpenguin (submissions) – 141 points, who created multiple articles about abortion rights and laws in African countries
• TheNuggeteer (submissions) – 126 points, who has contributed to several articles associated with the Phillippines
• Jaguarnik (submissions) – 125 points, with several good article reviews and an appearance in the In the news section of the Main Page
• Averageuntitleduser (submissions) – 119 points, and has written about several Haitian topics and historical figures.

Only one month remains until the end of the contest, so it's time to make your remaining nominations! Please consider answering some review requests, particularly the older entries, as a way of helping out your fellow participants and moving up the leaderboard. Good luck!

If you have any questions, please leave a message on the contest talk page or ask one of the coordinators: Ixtal (talk · contribs), sawyer777 (talk · contribs), or TechnoSquirrel69 (talk · contribs). (To unsubscribe from these updates, remove yourself from this list.) Sent via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 22:00, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

story · music · places

Thank you for clarification! - Recommended reading today: Frye Fire, by sadly missed Vami_IV. -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:12, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Happy because my story today is about a Czech mezzo soprano who is mentioned on the Main page on her birthday. --Gerda Arendt (talk)

I assume she's not foreign to everyone :) CMD (talk) 13:42, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We talked - as you may remember - about musicians foreign to the English Wikipedia, such as Márta Kurtág who didn't make it to the Main page and Maryvonne Le Dizès who almost didn't make it. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:18, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't agree with the terminology. They may be non-English, but they are no longer foreign to the English Wikipedia, as their articles have been created! CMD (talk) 14:43, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, English is not my first language - what then is a good word for people from a non-English culture, causing references not being in English. I don't know if you followed to the Kurtàg case. When she died - years ago - it took time until the news came around in English, and time to create an article based on sources in Hungarian, and more time to be halfway satisfied, and then nominating and being told that it was too late. When I complained afterwards ("Had she been an American man, she would have appeared, but now she was an Hungarian woman"), at least the rules were changed: whichever article is accepted comes to the first position. Until then, they had a sort by day of death which meant that even if she had been accepted it would have been to the last position, kicked out soon by the next who had died later. - Thanks for trying to help rephrasing, but even if there was close paraphrasing (so far I understand that the tool didn't work for the reviewer), phrases such as "she studied at so-and-so academy" don't need protection, - they are no author's personal property ;) - What I came to say was thanks for your DYK article today! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:51, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's perfectly fine as a word, it's just not one that I personally would like to use. I did not follow the Kurtàg case; I am not active at ITN. I wouldn't worry too much about it if things there don't work out at ITN, it has issues with process and purpose. Glad you enjoyed the DYK, I was lucky enough to come across an offline book which kickstarted my interest in the topic. CMD (talk) 12:14, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Which word would you use then for the Hungarian, the Czech and the French? - I had many bios fall off the ITN 7-days time limit, and wasn't concerned. I just got excited because it was (again, the second time I was concerned) a woman, and in both cases I had created the article. Two days ago, I watched a similar situation develop for a male musician (so it doesn't hit only woman), Herbie Flower, see Martin's talk, look for "Don't canvass for Herbie!". He was posted this morning, 3 hours past the deadline. - I'm not sure what you mean with "enjoyed the DYK". I rarely do these days. The mezzo was on OTD, on her 99th birthday. I hope she'll be shown again on her centenary ;) - Today is Schoenberg's 150th birthday! On display, portrayed by Egon Schiele, with a DYK hook from 2010 and another from 2014, about his 40th birthday, appeared on his 140th birthday, - I was happy with DYK then! (I made two this year, on my user page, but both not suitable for celebrating.) - See places for a stunning sunrise, on the day Bruckner's 200th birthday was celebrated (a few days late). --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:08, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I suppose I wouldn't describe them collectively in most situations, although I'm sure it's not a firm rule. I am surprised bios are falling off, I suppose that's more evidence that ITN just isn't working that well. Nice to hear about the 150th, that gives me so music to listen to. Can't reply to everything, a very busy time for me. Maybe it will calm down next month. CMD (talk) 14:17, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good evening and hello; I am studying your message in relation to comwrite; as I understand, users cannot use other versions except the latest one; but the other versions can be downloaded as image and used by anybody; in your free time, kindly check my newly uploaded food photos here Egg pie if this is ok, or give me some thoughts on this difficult for me, matter thank you again and very sincerely yours Valenzuela400 (talk) 12:08, 7 September 2024 (UTC).[reply]

People can download the images, but part of the utility is use on the wikis. The category is okay, but it's still odd to upload multiple different photos for each file. Just pick the one you like best! CMD (talk) 12:48, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

	The Malaysia WikiProject Newsletter
Issue 51 • July 2024 • About the Newsletter
WikiProject Malaysia would like to send all of our members happy Islamic New Year and Sarawak Day 2024. We wish you happy editing in Wikipedia and keep on making WikiProject Malaysia better. Statistics on the WikiProject progress and improvement: Subject namespaces: 56,430, an increase of 48 from last month Articles: 18,489, an increase of 5 from last month Stub-class Malaysia articles: 8,918, a decrease of 2 from last month Place-related articles without geographic coordinate: 1,014, a decrease of 1 from last month Active members: 44, an increase of 1 from last month Articles needing infoboxes: 144, a decrease of 1 from last month
WikiProject Malaysia Statistics There are currently about 56,430 subject namespaces attributed to the project, including 18,489 articles. There are 22 featured articles, 98 good articles and 8,918 stub articles. The project currently has 44 active members.
Past Newsletter • Newsroom • Malaysia Noticeboard • Malaysia Portal
Newsletter written by Chongkian. You may opt-out of this monthly newsletter by removing your name here.

	The Malaysia WikiProject Newsletter
Issue 52 • August 2024 • About the Newsletter
Happy 17th birthday to WikiProject Malaysia ~ :D WikiProject Malaysia would like to send all of our members happy Malaysia Independence Day. We wish you happy editing in Wikipedia and keep on making WikiProject Malaysia better. Statistics on the WikiProject progress and improvement: Subject namespaces: 56,570, an increase of 140 from last month Articles: 18,548, an increase of 59 from last month Stub-class Malaysia articles: 8,917, a decrease of 1 from last month Place-related articles without geographic coordinate: 1,011, a decrease of 3 from last month Active members: 45, an increase of 1 from last month Articles needing infoboxes: 143, a decrease of 1 from last month
WikiProject Malaysia Statistics There are currently about 56,570 subject namespaces attributed to the project, including 18,548 articles. There are 22 featured articles, 98 good articles and 8,917 stub articles. The project currently has 45 active members.
Past Newsletter • Newsroom • Malaysia Noticeboard • Malaysia Portal
Newsletter written by Chongkian. You may opt-out of this monthly newsletter by removing your name here.

—Kusma (talk) 00:02, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

—Kusma (talk) 00:02, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

BorgQueen (talk) 00:03, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]