Jump to content

User:PJvanMill

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the en-Wikipedia user page of PJvanMill (also known as pjvm, PJvM, or informally as PJ; a "he"). I made my first edit 4 years ago.

languages

[edit]

I am proficient in English and Nederlands. I understand Français and Deutsch.

interests

[edit]

I like the old ideal of the hominis universalis - I have a broad range of interests. I am generally more interested in ideas than physical things, and as such I tend to read and edit mostly articles about concepts, theories and the like. I am generally NOT interested in history, geography or biology.

strengths & weaknesses

[edit]

(self-evaluated, so probably biased in various ways)

strengths:

  • technical stuff
  • reasonable grasp of P&G

weaknesses:

  • sometimes verbose
  • sometimes pretty stubborn

relevant subpages

[edit]

Wikipedia activity

[edit]

In mainspace, I mostly do cleanup work - including making articles more neutral, performing merges &c -, usually trying to make pretty big messes into smaller messes. In Wikipedia space, I'm most active at the cleanup wikiproject, articles for deletion and the wikiproject council.

major contributions

[edit]
0 0
0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(reading this table)

(to fill in later - there are probably at least one or two articles for which my work would count as a "thorough cleanup"...?)

to do

[edit]
to-do items
  • co-production (public services): neutrality and integration work
  • Karl-Günther Heimsoth: first step is consistently formatting the sources - probably best with {{sfn}} and {{harvtxt}}, {{cite contribution}} was the one I was looking for but couldn't find earlier
  • Adrianne Gonzalez: seems probably notable (?), but promotionally overdetailed, there may be inappropriate use of sources
  • social stigma: needs integration with consideration of due weight, might need clearer distinction between fact and opinion in some places and needs a new lede
  • Lev Vygotsky: improve neutrality and due weight, integrate and balance different viewpoints
  • extended mind thesis: expand with the potential sources, probably include more viewpoints
  • corporatocracy: still a bit of a coatrack, perhaps in the solution no article exists at this title
  • co-creation: make use of more sources, integrate into one logically structured whole

half-relevant subpages

[edit]