Jump to content

Talk:CCGS Sir Wilfrid Laurier

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

The image Image:Canadian Coast Guard crest.png is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --04:30, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects

[edit]

These are the short forms of the name, common mispelling of "Wilfrid" (and complementing the redirect CCGS Sir Wilfred Laurier); and complements the redirect Sir Wilfrid Laurier (Ship). -- 76.65.128.252 (talk) 08:13, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Helicopter or no helicopter

[edit]

This is probably a question for the Canadian Coast Guard, but why does the CGC page for the ship [1] say that it does not have helicopter capabilities when in the images it clearly has a helicopter deck with a helicopter on it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.248.234.57 (talk) 12:22, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on CCGS Sir Wilfrid Laurier. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:10, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on CCGS Sir Wilfrid Laurier. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:37, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Builder's Name

[edit]

Hello,

It seems that there may be a slight inaccuracy in the name of the ship's builder. It's my understanding that the shipyard in Collingwood was called "Collingwood Shipbuilding" or "Collingwood Shipyards" in 1985/86. This company was a subsidiary of Canadian Shipbuilding & Engineering, which itself was a subsidiary of Canada Steamship Lines. Notably, this was a different company than Canadian Shipbuilding & Engineering (1986), which was formed as a result of a merger between the former Canadian Shipbuilding & Engineering and the Upper Lakes Shipping Company in October of 1986.

Neither of the companies named Canadian Shipbuilding & Engineering have dedicated pages, and I only have a strong working knowledge of the Collingwood shipyard. Therefore, I think it may be more appropriate to name the builder of this ship as "Collingwood Shipbuilding" since, as far as any sources I can find say, that was the official name of the yard that built this ship. However, it is also appropriate to say that "Canadian Shipbuilding & Engineering" was the company that built the ship.

It's a confusing situation, but I'm just looking to see what the consensus is before editing again since I don't want to be publishing mistakes.

Thanks in advance for your input. WheatenOdin51 (talk) 19:15, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What do the sources about the ship say? If the sources say Canadian Shipbuilding & Engineering, then that is what we go with, per WP:RS. The link can take people to the Collingwood Shipyard page where everything you mentioned can be explained. Llammakey (talk) 11:57, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That makes sense then, especially working from the Canadian Coast Guard's official information cited. Much appreciated. WheatenOdin51 (talk) 14:30, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]