User contributions for Kim Bruning
Results for Kim Bruning talk block log uploads logs global block log global account filter log
A user with 20,994 edits. Account created on 7 December 2003.
27 September 2024
- 20:2420:24, 27 September 2024 diff hist −150 Wikipedia talk:Ignore all rules →Shu ha ri: nvm Tag: Manual revert
- 20:2220:22, 27 September 2024 diff hist +150 Wikipedia talk:Ignore all rules →Shu ha ri: * Ah, Wikipedia:Levels of competence . Fair. --~~~~ Tag: Reverted
- 20:1820:18, 27 September 2024 diff hist +16 Ignore all rules →See also current
- 20:1420:14, 27 September 2024 diff hist +114 Wikipedia talk:Ignore all rules →Shu ha ri
- 20:1320:13, 27 September 2024 diff hist +236 Wikipedia talk:Ignore all rules Shu ha ri
- 20:1220:12, 27 September 2024 diff hist +16 Wikipedia:Ignore all rules shu ha ri wasn't mentioned yet, nor in the archives: "follow the rules, break the rules, transcend the rules" Tag: Reverted
11 March 2024
- 14:5414:54, 11 March 2024 diff hist −941 Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →"There is also disagreement about whether the effect is real at all": different answer entirely + I'm going to have to go off and think more ;-)
- 14:3114:31, 11 March 2024 diff hist +466 Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →"There is also disagreement about whether the effect is real at all"
- 14:2014:20, 11 March 2024 diff hist +611 Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →"There is also disagreement about whether the effect is real at all": I agree that scientists couch their criticisms and use polite language.
10 March 2024
- 14:0414:04, 10 March 2024 diff hist +788 Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →"There is also disagreement about whether the effect is real at all": thanks to Phlsph7 , + accidentally lost a cite?
- 13:5713:57, 10 March 2024 diff hist −33 Dunning–Kruger effect →Statistical and better-than-average effect: I don't think one can quite get away with "has been criticized on methodological grounds" when it's Dunning himself doing the criticizing in a response article. ;-)
9 March 2024
- 15:0515:05, 9 March 2024 diff hist +24 m Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →"There is also disagreement about whether the effect is real at all": +meanwhile
- 15:0415:04, 9 March 2024 diff hist +266 Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →"There is also disagreement about whether the effect is real at all": Reply Tag: Reply
- 10:3510:35, 9 March 2024 diff hist +370 Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →DK Effect is Simply Autocorrelation: Reply Tag: Reply
- 10:1610:16, 9 March 2024 diff hist +107 Dunning–Kruger effect →Statistical: I'm still not happy with this wording, but it's a lot better
- 09:5809:58, 9 March 2024 diff hist +5 m Dunning–Kruger effect →Statistical: should/could
- 09:5709:57, 9 March 2024 diff hist +38 Dunning–Kruger effect More careful wording to stress that According to Jarry's Reporting/ summary of the situation is it fully debunked. (and that Gaze is a bit more nuanced: people's interpretation of the paper has been overbroad, but a narrow reading may still be correct. )
- 02:2202:22, 9 March 2024 diff hist +8 m Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →DK Effect is Simply Autocorrelation: <s></s>
- 02:1902:19, 9 March 2024 diff hist +376 Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →DK Effect is Simply Autocorrelation: Reply Tag: Reply
- 02:1502:15, 9 March 2024 diff hist −27 Dunning–Kruger effect →Statistical: I'm really not happy with this wording, but it does meet minimum requirements to be left in .. I *think*.
- 01:3901:39, 9 March 2024 diff hist +223 Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →DK Effect is Simply Autocorrelation: sign again, since I've edited my comment based on updates
- 01:3201:32, 9 March 2024 diff hist −24 Dunning–Kruger effect →Statistical: more npov wording/ (was slightly misleading)
- 01:3201:32, 9 March 2024 diff hist −55 m Dunning–Kruger effect →Statistical: found 2 different references to same article
- 01:2201:22, 9 March 2024 diff hist +70 Dunning–Kruger effect →Statistical
- 01:1801:18, 9 March 2024 diff hist +200 Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →DK Effect is Simply Autocorrelation
- 01:1601:16, 9 March 2024 diff hist −89 Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect re - sign with logged in
28 November 2023
- 05:3905:39, 28 November 2023 diff hist +2 m Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →DK Effect is Simply Autocorrelation: sp
- 05:3905:39, 28 November 2023 diff hist +135 Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →DK Effect is Simply Autocorrelation: reword some more
- 05:2305:23, 28 November 2023 diff hist +1 m Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →DK Effect is Simply Autocorrelation
- 05:2205:22, 28 November 2023 diff hist −234 Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →DK Effect is Simply Autocorrelation: rewording to be closer to what the paper actually says.
- 05:1405:14, 28 November 2023 diff hist +26 m Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →DK Effect is Simply Autocorrelation: +ref
- 04:5704:57, 28 November 2023 diff hist +680 User talk:Gwern →For some reason I'm discussing minutiae of Dunning-Kruger, and I blame you.: new section Tag: New topic
- 04:4104:41, 28 November 2023 diff hist +531 Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →DK Effect is Simply Autocorrelation: replying to Constant314: Scientists often word things very carefully.
- 04:2704:27, 28 November 2023 diff hist +368 Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →DK Effect is Simply Autocorrelation: Reply Tag: Reply
27 November 2023
- 13:2313:23, 27 November 2023 diff hist 0 m Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →DK Effect is Simply Autocorrelation
- 13:2013:20, 27 November 2023 diff hist +34 m Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →DK Effect is Simply Autocorrelation
- 13:1813:18, 27 November 2023 diff hist +639 Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →DK Effect is Simply Autocorrelation: Reply Tag: Reply
- 13:0613:06, 27 November 2023 diff hist +1,983 Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →DK Effect is Simply Autocorrelation: Reply Tag: Reply
- 11:4811:48, 27 November 2023 diff hist +55 m Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →DK Effect is Simply Autocorrelation
- 11:4611:46, 27 November 2023 diff hist −37 Dunning–Kruger effect And... read the papers through and found somewhat more careful wording. Tag: Reverted
- 11:4111:41, 27 November 2023 diff hist −5 m Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →DK Effect is Simply Autocorrelation
- 11:4011:40, 27 November 2023 diff hist +852 Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →DK Effect is Simply Autocorrelation: Annnd... just came back from reading papers
- 11:2411:24, 27 November 2023 diff hist +643 Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →DK Effect is Simply Autocorrelation: Additional (possibly redundant) request for more detail here.
- 11:1811:18, 27 November 2023 diff hist +1,023 Dunning–Kruger effect rv (1RR/BRD) Re-checking contents of each of the papers, I'm not entirely sure why refs were removed/reverted. I left a note on the talk page as well. I'd be interested to see what the explicit issues are (on the talk page) Tags: Manual revert Reverted harv-error
- 00:3900:39, 27 November 2023 diff hist +1 m Dunning–Kruger effect + full stop Tag: Reverted
- 00:3800:38, 27 November 2023 diff hist +22 m Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →DK Effect is Simply Autocorrelation: + why I say that
- 00:3700:37, 27 November 2023 diff hist +51 m Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →DK Effect is Simply Autocorrelation
- 00:3500:35, 27 November 2023 diff hist −2 m Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →DK Effect is Simply Autocorrelation: better wording
- 00:3400:34, 27 November 2023 diff hist +947 Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →DK Effect is Simply Autocorrelation
- 00:2500:25, 27 November 2023 diff hist +395 m Dunning–Kruger effect pp->loc add paper titles. Tag: Reverted
