Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Weapons (Turtle Press)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Palladium Books. Spartaz ^Humbug! 20:57, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Weapons (Turtle Press) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

And less sadly this is also not notable Slatersteven (talk) 18:52, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep or merge, but not sure where yet; it was part of a series of books which were later published by Palladium Books so I will have to see what else I can find: https://rpggeek.com/rpgseries/3173/palladium-books-weapons

Merge, I really do not think it is independently notable (and it did not realize it was that pile of crap).Slatersteven (talk) 19:14, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 00:33, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Replying to the question: I stand by my initial "Keep" because I did find a couple more independent, reliable sources, but if this were to be a merge, I would say Palladium Books. BOZ (talk) 18:00, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. This is rpg minutiae, refs or not. Szzuk (talk) 12:57, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  "Minutiae" is not a valid reason to delete, especially as you make it clear that you are discarding three independent, reliable sources. 99.203.15.108 (talk) 13:14, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete for lack of independent notability. -The Gnome (talk) 19:56, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  Three independent sources, and still looking for a delete? A merge target has been identified above (Palladium Books) and note that even the user who started this AFD agreed above that a merge made sense once he had a better idea of what the subject was. But you're still figuring delete as the one and only option? 99.203.15.108 (talk) 13:09, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge to Palladium Books, per BOZ. These were a real series of 80's RPG supplements, and the GNG coverage is marginal, but sufficient to support a merge rather than deletion. Jclemens (talk) 00:05, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.