Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Ousley (2nd nomination)

< Wikipedia:Articles for deletion
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Time may tell on this one, but current consensus is to keep. Mojo Hand (talk) 13:28, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew Ousley

edit
AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

Andrew Ousley (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ANYBIO and lacks coverage in independent third-party reliable sources. Ryandnes (talk) 11:02, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


  • Keep. I think Andrew Ousley meets the notability requirements because the sources below show that he has received significant coverage in reliable, independent publications:

The New York Times: "How a Producer of Concerts in Crypts and Catacombs Spends His Sundays"

In this feature article, The New York Times profiles Andrew Ousley and his innovative approach to classical music. The piece provides in-depth coverage of his "Death of Classical" series, highlighting how he brings performances to crypts and catacombs. It discusses his impact on making classical music more accessible and engaging to modern audiences, underscoring his significance in the arts community.

Forbes: "From Crypts To Catacombs: This Entrepreneur Is Giving Classical Music A Radical Makeover"

This Forbes article offers a comprehensive look at Ousley's efforts to revitalize classical music by hosting concerts in unconventional venues. It delves into his entrepreneurial journey, detailing how he founded his company and developed unique concert experiences. The coverage emphasizes his innovative contributions to the music industry and his role in attracting new audiences to classical music.

Billboard: "As Concerts Return, Death of Classical Brings Beethoven to Life In a Cemetery After Dark"

In this piece, Billboard highlights Ousley's "Death of Classical" series and its significance during the return of live music performances. The article discusses a Beethoven concert held in Green-Wood Cemetery, showcasing how Ousley's creative vision provides immersive experiences. It underscores his influence on the live music scene and his adaptability in challenging times.

The New York Times: "Is Opera Dying? No, But This One Is Staged Among the Dead"

This article reports on Ousley's production of Purcell's "Dido and Aeneas" staged in the catacombs of a cemetery. The New York Times provides significant coverage of the event, exploring how the unique setting enhances the opera's themes. The piece highlights Ousley's innovative approach to classical music presentation and his contribution to keeping the art form vibrant.

Associated Press: "Purcell opera performed in cemetery catacombs"

The Associated Press covers the unique performance of "Dido and Aeneas" in cemetery catacombs organized by Ousley. The article details the production's concept and execution, illustrating his role in creating groundbreaking musical events. This coverage by a major news outlet emphasizes his notability and the widespread interest in his work. Sirmallionborntolk (talk) 15:39, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The last 3 barely even mention him. New York Times article is mostly an interview. A few sentences can be added to the Death of Classical page Ryandnes (talk) 11:32, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak keep: I don't think subject fails WP:ANYBIO, but I'm also not entirely convinced that he is intrinsically notable independent of his concert series. The NYT piece alone establishes that he does not lack coverage from "independent third-party reliable sources". However, it's a vapid puff-piece that borders on being a promo. —CurryTime7-24 (talk) 21:33, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Andrew_Ousley_(2nd_nomination)&oldid=1246853285"