Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2018/11/07

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive November 7th, 2018
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No detail information of this photo. It may not be taken by the user. AT (talk) 13:31, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@AT: I changed the image to the right screenshot form the Youtube source, and that source is CC-BY. This is Taiwania Justo speaking (Reception Room) 15:18, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
OK. I undo the action already.—AT (talk) 15:23, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: The copyvio version is deleted and the free version is kept. --Mys_721tx (talk) 16:14, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i think this pic does'nt have a free license. it's loaok like a Screenshot from instagram VenkateshMgna (talk) 13:56, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Re-upload File:Rashmika GG.png. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 15:50, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubtful authorship/permission. Source file in Russian Wikipedia by "Vinogradov A.I.", uploader's name (Majuro) is different. A.Savin 15:05, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging @Majuro: for explanation --A.Savin 15:06, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Same person. Look here. You don't know what nickname is? --Sergkarman (talk) 01:28, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This was not visible from the description page of File:Генический морской порт.jpg. You are walking on very thin ice with your permanent personal attacks. --A.Savin 02:01, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Withdrawn. --A.Savin 01:59, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Image is from the source indicated, but there is no indication the image is available under a license compatible with Commons. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Destiny (streamer).jpg. Hammersoft (talk) 00:18, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Jcb (talk) 17:11, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ce n est pas le logo officielle Amazighkabyle (talk) 17:23, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: nonsense DR. --Jcb (talk) 17:40, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright infringement, no real source is mentioned DZwarrior1 (talk) 14:42, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:07, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced it with File:Carte de Homs centrée sur 34° 43′ 49″ nord, 36° 43′ 04″ est.jpg. Recruos (talk) 12:49, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:13, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Losthighway1990 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Found at http://fidanfilm.ir/en/umbra/, missing permission.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:09, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:17, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Part of the logo of an organization; the full logo will be uploaded to en.wikipedia as a non-free image C.Fred (talk) 22:37, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is fine by me, I made use of the Wikipedia media uploader which was clearly wrong, didn’t know better. Discussion on the page where this is being used has also concluded the full crest is better to be used. MattIPv4 (talk) 22:44, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:00, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photograph is misleading, it is a false-colour version of File:Jean-Léon Gérôme - After the Bath.jpg. Unfortunately this fake colour version has been widely reused because it was put on the Wikidata record for the painting as the "official" image. This has since been swapped to the authentic version.

Deletion and redirect to the original is necessary as the image actively misleads and misinforms. There is no reason for other Wikimedia projects or reusers off-wiki to use this false colour version and continuing to host it on Commons will leave the door open for future mistaken reuse or further deliberate misrepresentation. (talk) 18:11, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Addendum As the issue of EXIF misuse been raised on COM:AN/U, it is worth highlighting that this file also suffers from fake EXIF data. The EXIF appears to verify the file is a professional photograph by Sotheby's when demonstrably it is not. Fortunately the source is still available to check, if it were a dead link, then the false attribution would be impossible to disprove. -- (talk) 00:01, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, I'll create a redirect. Taivo (talk) 09:23, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

http://www.hocakworak.com/article.aspx?headline=Sharice+Davids%27+new+TV+ad+focuses+on+life+story Coffeeandcrumbs (talk) 03:20, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedy deleted as copyvio. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:56, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken from Twitter without permission. Coffeeandcrumbs (talk) 06:42, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyright violation: Taken from her Twitter account. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 20:26, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unuseful redirect Tangopaso (talk) 18:27, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 17:35, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

it is a non free image, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Minecraft, a Copyrighted video game screenshots, derivitave content or otherwise out of scope uploads. -- A2569875 (talk) 21:12, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 08:27, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

it is a non free image, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Minecraft , a Copyrighted video game screenshots, derivitave content or otherwise out of scope uploads. -- A2569875 (talk) 21:13, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 08:28, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

it is a non free image, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Minecraft , a Copyrighted video game screenshots, derivitave content or otherwise out of scope uploads. -- A2569875 (talk) 21:13, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 08:26, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:01, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 09:56, 13 November 2018 UTC: No permission since 5 November 2018 --Krdbot 13:54, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sayeedmehmood (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope.

‐‐1997kB (talk) 09:45, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:24, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not free media file, original on instagram. Mehman 97 13:11, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:27, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As I see on the site from where the photos are transferred to the Commons there is no talk about a free license. (See this) Mehman 97 13:16, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:27, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As I see on the site from where the photos are transferred to the Commons there is no talk about a free license. (See this) Mehman 97 13:16, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:27, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Usernamemed (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/source and country of origin should be provided and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:12, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Usernamemed (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:13, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:29, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Usernamemed (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Per checks on reverse Google, the images appear to be used elsewhere, no evidence of own work (also no EXIF data) and many appear on other websites

Mifter (talk) 20:27, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:57, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии: фото встречается в Интернете до загрузки на Викисклад <http://upch.tatarstan.ru/rus/f.htm/photoreport/4014347.htm>, <https://azertag.az/ru/xeber/Nachala_rabotu_XV_Bakinskaya_mezhdunarodnaya_konferenciya_ombudsmenov__OBNOVLENO_VIDEO-1173215>, <https://www.azertag.com/ru/xeber/1173215>. Необходимо подтверждение от автора в OTRS. Dogad75 (talk) 15:54, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:30, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

test image for Commons app camera Misaochan2 (talk) 15:35, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete. @Misaochan2: You can mark your own recent uploads for deletion by putting {{SD|G7}} at the top of the file description. --bjh21 (talk) 14:02, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 16:09, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Testing .PNG upload with Commons app Misaochan2 (talk) 15:41, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 16:09, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tourist.city.shiraz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Blatant spam.

jdx Re: 04:30, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 16:09, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-portrait with no obvious encyclopedic purpose; not in use on any wiki. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 05:26, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 16:10, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image without any encyclopedic purpose; not in use on any wiki. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 05:28, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 16:10, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No clear purpose; not in use on any wiki. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 05:29, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 16:10, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self portrait without purpose; not in use on any wiki ThatMontrealIP (talk) 05:31, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 16:10, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steven Lyon, Steven Lyon was considered non-notable and his photo is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 08:02, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 16:10, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, the uploader's only contribution. Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 08:04, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 16:10, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. The same photo is in subject's userpage http://kaushikbasu.org/ . I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 08:17, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 16:11, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 09:31, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 16:11, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused logo, out of project. Willy1018(talk) 14:15, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 16:12, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused logo, out of project. Willy1018(talk) 14:17, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 16:12, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 16:12, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of image. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:59, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 16:12, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:05, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 16:12, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Project scope: dictionary definition of CPU Lupo 10:42, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]


   * 16:40, 7 February 2009 EugeneZelenko (Talk | contribs | block) deleted "File:El CPU.pdf" ‎ (Out of project scope: Text document) (restore)

 — Mike.lifeguard 19:05, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 16:13, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertisement. No evidence of permission(s). Also out of Commons:Project scope. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:16, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 16:13, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo-album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 16:13, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:44, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 16:13, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:45, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 16:13, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Proudyemeni1980 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:58, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 16:13, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:04, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 16:13, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:05, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 16:14, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Farhan709 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE (en:Tangia Zaman Methila).

Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:00, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 16:14, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Scope and possibly even vandalism or copyvio. L293D (talk) 23:38, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 16:15, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not usefull for the project Drongou (talk) 00:23, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: also likely copyright violation. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:31, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only half a picture JopkeB (talk) 02:41, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:31, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Half a picture JopkeB (talk) 02:41, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:31, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal-type file from Flickr. Out of scope. Hiàn (talk) 04:39, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:32, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1947 photos are unlikely own work. Real photographer and better license are needed. Taivo (talk) 09:19, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:33, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete delete per OTRS request - other images have been verified Ww2censor (talk) 09:48, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:10, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no source ?? Mutter Erde (talk) 10:01, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:13, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:15, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by REFIVE (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused logo, out of project.

Willy1018(talk) 14:10, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:17, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mr Fodil1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:07, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:51, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Balor9003 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be moved to relevant project as wiki-text if useful. Used in draft.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:09, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:51, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ram Marcha (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private files storage. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:14, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:51, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rafael Zink (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Uploader removes No Source templates despite explanation hence this regular DR.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:05, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Those DR are unjustified. I do have stated the sources and the author. All licenses are fine. Seems like Patrick Rogel is bugging me! Rafael Zink (talk) 17:28, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
A license permission has been send by Carambol to OTRS-Team last night. Check first before delete any files! Regards Rafael Zink (talk) 07:36, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:11, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rafael Zink (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Permission of different photographers needed via COM:OTRS.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 18:11, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:53, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rafael Zink (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not sure the permission is sufficient for Commons: "re-publication" doesn't mean re-license.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:11, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: license at source site is non-free. For example, it does not allow for modification. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:55, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rafael Zink (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Photographer's permission needed via COM:OTRS.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:31, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS [Ticket#2018110410004211] Carambol Regards Rafael Zink (talk) 09:15, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: OTRS I have just accepted permission under ticket:2018110410004211. --Emha (talk) 15:42, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rafael Zink (talk · contribs)

[edit]

OTRS template added by a non-OTRS Team member. To be verified.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 07:18, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Again, Roger, you are wrong. I have the permission to do so via e-mail from 18 decembar 2019 by @Reinhard Kraasch: . This permission includes also his other templates for me as uploader, including: {{Carambol cc-by-sa}}, {{Martin Horn cc-by-sa}}, {{Karsten Witte cc-by-sa}}, {{Roger Schaewe cc-by-sa}},

 Info This seems to be an approach that looks a bit unusual, as the license template {{Carambol cc-by-sa}} used by Rafael Zink includes the OTRS template and was created by OTRS team member Reinhard Kraasch for that purpose, so Rafael Zink didn't directly add an OTRS template as a non-OTRS team member. I think we only need a short confirmation by Reinhard Kraasch that it applies to the current uploads too, then everything can be kept. Gestumblindi (talk) 12:45, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The ticket says "all images by Dieter Ernst/Carambol uploaded by Rafeal Zink", so it also covers these uploads. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 15:12, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 15:14, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image from Getty Images SecretName101 (talk) 18:18, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 07:55, 15 November 2018 UTC: Copyright violation: copyrighted stock content per meta --Krdbot 13:53, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Jotzet as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: copied from https://hatunefoundation.com/international/travel-report-ethiopia-celebrating-christmas-with-the-poor/
Converted by me to DR to allow for discussion. The external hit is dated earlier than our upload. However, the external image has markedly lower resolution, whereby it can't hardly be the true source. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:06, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

C'mon, a difference of 77 KB isn't really that mind-blowing... Nevertheless, "own work" is highly questionable and there's no evidence that the photo had been licensed as claimed. At least the cropped low res file w/o proper Exif data has to be deleted as long as the supposed copyright holder named Hans Erling Jensen (according to meta data) didn't declare his consent. --Jotzet (talk) 23:58, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This picture is not a copy from the internet. I contacted the "International Sister Hatune Foundation" and got the picture from the president Hans Erling Jensen, Sweden. I dont know how to proove his permission, I can take a picture from the original email, but how could I include it in the page of the file? I think it is also unusual.Eugeniusz Koszalinski (talk) 07:46, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Eugeniusz, you should forward said email to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org . --Túrelio (talk) 07:48, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - permission can be sent to OTRS. --Jcb (talk) 21:59, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hochlader ist offensichtlich nicht Ueheber bzw. Rechteinhaber Lutheraner (talk) 15:33, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy keep Properly licensed file. --Jotzet (talk) 15:55, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: @Lutheraner: Der Hochlader ist in der Tat sicher nicht selbst der Urheber oder Rechteinhaber, aber die Fotos der Bildquelle "Archief Beeld en Geluid" stehen dort unter der angegebenen freien Lizenz, damit ist hier wohl alles in Ordnung. (Properly licensed, source states CC BY-SA 3.0). --Gestumblindi (talk) 02:45, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

In Ordnung, danke--Lutheraner (talk) 09:35, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Fgfg.jpg Pacmen323 (talk) 17:11, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: personal picture, uploader's request. --Gestumblindi (talk) 02:58, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

clearly non-free L293D (talk) 22:32, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 03:00, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unremarkable/irrelevant. Miscategorised. Image is of a copyrighted logo completely unrelated to the description or topic. 192.222.252.33 23:19, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: It's the logo of the band "Muse" which is too simple for copyright, but we have it already here in better quality, and it's indeed unrelated to the description. --Gestumblindi (talk) 03:02, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality, unclear if it was meant for public use (may be harmful to the depicted person), not more useful than other media that depicts the same type of subject and pose 185.217.171.36 23:45, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, acceptable quality. Taivo (talk) 08:31, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deriviative work. ~Cybularny Speak? 16:38, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Masur (talk) 06:30, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious claim of ownership. The image is watermarked to "Defaj Photography". Pichpich (talk) 00:11, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:35, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that the author is actually anonymous, rather than just unknown to the uploader. Underlying lk (talk) 04:00, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I, unfortunately, do not know who the author of this photo. It would be nice if someone finds out who is the author of this photo. But, at present, I don’t know the author’s last names. I think that at the moment, the author of the photo is unknown.Kalnroze (talk) 13:35, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unclear copyright status. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:43, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appear to be taken from a book (or other stuff), may be a derivative work. B dash (talk) 09:25, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:31, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

request by the person concerned and the author of the picture Pparole (talk) 09:37, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

request by the person concerned and the author of the picture Pparole (talk) 09:40, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Author request/unused : ok. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:33, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appear to be taken from a book (or other stuff), may be a derivative work. B dash (talk) 09:58, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:33, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Television screen, so under copyright, autoriaztion needed, see Commons:OTRS/fr Shev123 (talk) 11:27, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, two version in the history but both are copyvios. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:35, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation; arguably too complex for {{PD-textlogo}} IagoQnsi (talk) 22:32, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:40, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

found elsewhere http://tele70france.blogspot.com/2014/01/numero-un-du-23-juin-1981-des-numeros.html Jmax (talk) 22:32, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:40, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Book cover, copyvio Jamez42 (talk) 22:51, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:40, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a Tasnim News picture. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:55, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:42, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication that this in indeed an original work by {{Tasnim}} 4nn1l2 (talk) 19:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 12:59, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work Didym (talk) 23:11, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:37, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Diki dok (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope

Mitte27 (talk) 23:46, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:36, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Diki dok (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:30, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: procedural close, Files already deleted by other admins. - FitIndia Talk Mail 13:57, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Diki dok (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All uploads appear to be random stuff license washed from internet searches.

(talk) 22:45, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 09:41, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality, weird angle, blurry, personality rights. Hundreds of better S2000 pictures available. mr.choppers (talk)-en- 04:23, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:31, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bei Flickreview2 auffaellig :-( Wikisympathisant (talk) 20:37, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 16:32, 10 Dezember 2018 UTC: CSD G7 (author or uploader request deletion) --Krdbot 19:48, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copy of https://just-style.me/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/just-style.me_LOGO_175.png Eingangskontrolle (talk) 15:26, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 21:09, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obvious license laundering via flickr upload after the file had been deleted two times. This image was originally posted to www.brunomotta.com.br as http://brunomotta.zip.net/images/FotoZe.jpg, author: Eugênio Sávio what hadn't been considered through a previous deletion debate. Jotzet (talk) 15:32, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

P.S.: Actually Washington Alves/Light Press seems to be the copyright holder of the photograph according to the Exif data which is visible on the Flickr source given while the uploader added this comment to my talk page. --Jotzet (talk) 16:24, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 21:10, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Description indicate that The uploader is the author but the exif indicate Osservatore romano/AFP Olivier LPB (talk) 15:43, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 21:11, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cover made of a photograph published in 1959 in India. It will enter the public domain in India in 2020 (60 years after publication). BrightRaven (talk) 15:53, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 21:12, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused file, private image BrightRaven (talk) 15:58, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 21:11, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyviol from https://www.pugliapress.org/2018/01/20/brindisi-il-centrosinistra-si-accorda-riccardo-rossi-candidato-sindaco/ Antonio1952 (talk) 16:52, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Il File è stato realizzato per la campagna elettorale, è la base di tutti i manifesti. Lo si può notare anche nella mia http://www.brindisibenecomune.it/images/phocagallery/amministrative2018/domenico_turrisi_f.jpg Prima di poterla utilizzare gli ho chiesto il permesso direttamente al sig. Rossi. Se verrà cancellata non importa vuoldire che il giorno dopo ne pubblicherò un'altra fotografata direttamente da me. Al momento ho circa 12 Gb di immagini essendo fondatore di Brindisi bene comune e web master del sito.

Grazie — Preceding unsigned comment added by DomenicoTurrisi (talk • contribs) 17:41, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Please contact OTRS for undeletion. — Racconish💬 21:12, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope. Numerous alternatives in its category. P 1 9 9   17:01, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:21, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio : The uploader is probably not the author of the photo. No exif and photo already present here [2] Olivier LPB (talk) 14:28, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:43, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:34, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rhaell93 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:06, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:34, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obvious license laundering via flickr upload (first attempt after deletion: via Imdb). This image was originally posted to www.brunomotta.com.br as http://brunomotta.zip.net/images/BrunoImproRiso3peq.JPG, author: Moisés Pazzia what hadn't been considered through a previous deletion debate. Jotzet (talk) 15:33, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

P.S.: The uploader added this comment to my talk page without specifying the file he's mentioning. --Jotzet (talk) 16:43, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 12:39, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This football logo is still protected by copyright. 122.53.31.196 00:59, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well if this image was found to be below COM:TOO, then I don't see how this one is above it. GMGtalk 01:03, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per GMG. Ruthven (msg) 09:46, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Finnish air force roundel border.svg. Kwasura (talk) 02:16, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Ignore the colour for now. We don't know the exact colour yet. I am waiting for the Finnish MOD to respond to my message to them. It's take some time. So, we can discuss the representation of the Finnish Air Force roundels in category. In my opinion, two of each roundels are enough.

  • Finnish air force roundel 1934-1945 border.svg
  • Finnish air force roundel 1934-1945.svg
  • Finnish air force roundel border.svg
  • Finnish air force roundel.svg

These are the manes with standard names too. So, there is one file too many in this category. Any other thoughts? Sincerely, --Kwasura (talk) 02:25, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The file names are currently standardized to "Roundel of ...", therefore this file should be maintained as it remains within the current naming convention. Fry1989 eh? 17:57, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
OK, if the "Roundel of ..." is indeed a standard then the "Finnish air force roundel" need to be deleted and other three files renamed appropriately. As a result we will have:
  • Roundel of Finland 1934-1945 border.svg
  • Roundel of Finland 1934-1945.svg
  • Roundel of Finland border.svg
  • Roundel of Finland.svg

Sincerely, --Kwasura (talk) 23:14, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: not exact duplicate. Ruthven (msg) 09:46, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no Commons:Threshold of originality guidance for Perú, and this would probably be complex enough to be copyright. 2800:810:4A5:86A9:9C2E:9AED:BC4E:B283 05:58, 7 November 2018 (UTC) (EMans (talk))[reply]

 Delete MiguelAlanCS (talk) 21:05, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Oppose It's just a simply logo, if it's too complex, we can modify it, so it can stay here.--VictorPines (talk) 13:27, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
VictorPines, that's not an argument, that's hope. We tend to use arguments instead. --EMans (talk) 06:16, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Arguments for a picture,? I'm trying to find a solution. I don't see you have any arguments for it's deletion.--VictorPines (talk) 20:51, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Oppose I agree with VictorPines. The original upload was created by Peje suizo (probably using MS Paint), i only replaced the file with a more acurrate depiction of the logo taken from an article from lamula.pe. I've read here that Peru has full freedom of panorama, so we should check if there is a free licensed photograph, with the CMHNTM logo in it. --Mayimbú (talk) 00:50, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: simple logo. Ruthven (msg) 09:45, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Google translates file description: "The person that appears in the photo is Alex Jesús Cabello Leiva ..." Uploader is the same person and this is not a selfie. Maybe the photo is not own work, but real photographer's copyright violation? Taivo (talk) 10:29, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

La fotografía la tomé haciendo uso de temporalizador y control remoto de la cámara Canon. Es por eso que la fotografía tiene los datos de Metadata que graba mi cámara. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexcocopro (talk • contribs) 19:23, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per Alexcocopro. Ruthven (msg) 09:45, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own created file, it was never renamed with this logo Mixery85 (talk) 12:15, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 09:47, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Contains personal information (Car number) ysjbserver (talk) 12:15, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: deleted former version with the plaque number. Ruthven (msg) 09:48, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Despite the picture is not exactly the one already published here (the hand on the left is the only difference), the artwork is clearly the same. Probably DR. Equoreo (talk) 14:10, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: DW Copyright © 2013 - Frangioni Roberto - Loc. Valdana 7 a – 57037 Portoferraio – arteelba@yahoo.it. - All Rights Reserved. Ruthven (msg) 09:49, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Despite the picture is not exactly the one already published here (the tool on the figure is the only difference), the artwork is clearly the same. Probably DR. Equoreo (talk) 14:11, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: DW of recent artwork. Ruthven (msg) 09:49, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Derivative work from poster. Should be blanked to keep. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 09:50, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pas trouvé l'image sur Flickr afin de vérifier la licence Shev123 (talk) 14:51, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination + probable copyviol of the artwork. Ruthven (msg) 09:50, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pas trouvé l'image sur Flickr afin de vérifier la licence Shev123 (talk) 14:51, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Elle est ici : https://www.flickr.com/photos/cedricbernadotte/25290343071/in/album-72157665077214802/ [User:Bronzone|Bronzone]]

Merci pour le lien et j'ai modifié la page. La demande de suppression reste d'actualité car l'artiste n'est pas dans le domaine public et qu'il n'y a pas de liberté de panorama en France. --Shev123 (talk) 19:09, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: while OTRS process is ongoing. Ruthven (msg) 09:51, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photo was previously published here. An OTRS ticket is required. Diannaa (talk) 15:04, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 09:51, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

local errado Duck Talles (talk) 15:18, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. Ruthven (msg) 09:52, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lucera è una cittadina che ha un suo stemma, non uno stato, e questa bandiera è una creazione di fantasia che ricorda vagamente la bandiera della Finlandia. Santajusta77 (talk) 15:31, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Condivido. Si tratta di un'opera di fantasia. Va eliminata.--Sim85 (talk) 15:38, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion. Ruthven (msg) 09:52, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Phoebe6827 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/source and country of origin should be provided and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:59, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 09:53, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/source and country of origin should be provided and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:01, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 09:53, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/source and country of origin should be provided and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:07, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per Jeff. Ruthven (msg) 09:53, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cavero.H (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unlikely to be own work

Didym (talk) 16:27, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: all are copyvio from https://www.welcomechile.com/temuco/fotografias.html. Ruthven (msg) 09:54, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as no permission (No permission since) Jcb (talk) 16:58, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What is the exact permission problem?  Keep for now, unless clarification is given. Jcb (talk) 16:59, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per {{FoP-Germany}}. Ruthven (msg) 09:57, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cositas chulas (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused logo and product photos without evidence of permission. Apparently uploaded for spamming on es:User:Cositas chulas. Not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope. If deemed within scope for some reason, evidence of licensing permission is required (including licensing permission for non-free Disney characters, which obviously isn't going to happen).

LX (talk, contribs) 19:13, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination + all rights reserved + promotional. Ruthven (msg) 10:01, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commercial design with copyright: https://chilito.cl/tienda/ Vareloco (talk) 19:53, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

La imagen representa una expresión de la chilenidad. Y poseo los derechos intelectuales y copyright sobre la foto y su contenido. The image represents an expression of Chileanness. And I own the intellectual rights and copyright on the photo and its content. — Preceding unsigned comment added by U Chile Diseño (talk • contribs) 02:47, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; OTRS authorisation needed from the company. Ruthven (msg) 10:02, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The only issue I have with this file is the obscenity on the button, I would argue that it's inappropriate regardless of the subject matter. 65.200.48.253 21:15, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Picture has educational value. Not sure if the John Bielenberg designed logo is below COM:TOO though https://www.sierraclub.org/library/sierra-club-logo-history Abzeronow (talk) 22:13, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Oppose The text mentioned by the IP address is so small that the large majority of viewers certainly do not even read it. And the picture has prime educational value. Rosaccraghirtille (talk) 21:09, 20 November 2018 (UTC).[reply]
 Oppose Really? Files with educational value should now be deleted because they're "inappropriate"? AnarchistiCookie (talk) 07:58, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Oppose If anything, it'd be more vulgar than obscene.DMBFFF (talk) 07:58, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 10:03, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I labelled it incorrectly Esad58 (talk) 22:13, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader's request. Ruthven (msg) 10:03, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author has died in 1949, so the file is still not free until 1950 Smiley.toerist (talk) 23:49, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Smiley.toerist means that it's not free until 1-1-2020. Tag it for undeletion at that time. -- Deadstar (msg) 12:26, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
✓ DoneSmiley.toerist (talk) 13:27, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per Deadstar. Ruthven (msg) 10:04, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Undeleted: Out of copyright now! --PierreSelim (talk) 13:37, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

WP:COPYVIO / no permission from depicted person. 2003:D2:1F3A:3E16:C950:90C9:32F2:8D96 02:25, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 09:08, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image of a vinyl single sticker. possibly not for free use. 100cellsman (talk) 06:12, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Not sure what the burning issue is. It is just the same as this same image being used on eBay, Amazon, and practically everywhere else on the planet to sell records and discuss. There are no copyright restrictions on the image, which is just that - a picture of the record! I think the application of copyright privileges is being taken to extremes! Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Musicollector (talk • contribs) 15:43, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well I just assumed it was so because of this: [3], if this isn't an issue, this can be let go.100cellsman (talk) 23:45, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps the license could be changed into public domain instead.100cellsman (talk) 03:36, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: PD-ineligible. --Yann (talk) 09:09, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Delete Non-educational content, an image of no encyclopedic value. It is supposed to be an ancient item from "3rd century BC" as stated in the caption, but it is an obviously modern object of unknown quality and doubtful accuracy or relation to the "original" (if any). Most likely a self-made item by user Harrygouvas, like in other similar cases (cf. this, or that etc.), kept in his pseudo-museum. ——Chalk19 (talk) 12:05, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 09:10, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photographs of identifiable people (Commons:Photographs of identifiable people) ysjbserver (talk) 12:10, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Can be blurred, but public place. --Yann (talk) 09:12, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader's request: person's face is directly exposed, and File:Imsil Bongcheon Station F4.jpg is same without person. ysjbserver (talk) 07:08, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:14, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Contains personal information (Car number) ysjbserver (talk) 12:15, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Can be blurred, but public place. --Yann (talk) 09:12, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader's request: It wasn't used and File:Imsil Bongcheon Station F4.jpg is same file without the car number. ysjbserver (talk) 07:12, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:14, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Goku4711 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused logo, out of project.

Willy1018(talk) 14:12, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The first one is in use.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:18, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 09:13, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This painting is effectively a work of fiction, it is a false-colour version of File:John La Farge, by Robert Wilton Lockwood 1891.jpg. The original version from the Museum of Fine Arts in Boston. This fake colour derivative is only in use on the Spanish Wikipedia because Jan Arkesteijn planted them diff1 diff2. Replacing the authentic official original image with misleading colour versions on Wikipedia, without any notice or consensus to do so, appears to be a pure act of vandalism.

Deletion is necessary as the image actively misleads and misinforms. There is no reason for other Wikimedia projects or reusers off-wiki to use this false colour version and continuing to host it on Commons will leave the door open for future mistaken reuse or further deliberate misrepresentation. (talk) 14:27, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Addendum The EXIF data misleadingly gives the impression that "Museum of Fine Arts, Boston" released their photograph as "Online copyright statement: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/" and "Usage terms: Public domain". Very specifically they do not release any of their colour photographs this way and claim copyright for all photographs. Hosting on Wikimedia Commons requires the uploader's independent assertion that the original work is public domain and a faithful reproduction in the source country and the USA is insufficient creativity for the MFA copyright claim to have legal meaning.

Naturally, any professional GLAM institute photographer would be mortified to see themselves or their organization's name appear to be officially to blame for the creation of a bad colour version, retinted like a instagram holiday snap. -- (talk) 14:39, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: In neither of User:Jan Arkesteijn's edits did they replace the "official" picture. The first was a replacement of File:LaFarge1902.jpg (a very dark b/w version), and the second was a pure addition. I think it's unfair to describe these as "vandalism". COM:INUSE thus applies and the pictures should not be deleted while they're in use on Spanish Wikipedia. --bjh21 (talk) 14:15, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
It is no longer in use. Jan Arkesteijn chose to covertly promote a fake colour version, deliberately avoiding a mention anywhere that it was a fake colour version, and failing to bother to upload the professional true colour version as published by the MFA Boston. These actions damage the mission of this project and Wikipedias where the faked images are unknowingly used, mistaken for the original GLAM photographs as both the Wikimedia Commons titles, text and even the misleading EXIF data encourage. Vandalism should be discouraged whenever we find it, not obfuscated for years on end until we are facing having to fix thousands of uploads, rather than taking positive action.
As stated There is no reason for other Wikimedia projects or reusers off-wiki to use this false colour version and continuing to host it on Commons will leave the door open for future mistaken reuse or further deliberate misrepresentation. -- (talk) 15:17, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, not used. --Yann (talk) 09:14, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photograph is misleading, it is a false-colour version of File:William-Adolphe Bouguereau (1825-1905) - Nymphs and Satyr (1873) HQ.jpg of the identical resolution. Unfortunately this fake colour version has been widely reused because it was put on the Wikidata record for the painting as the "official" image. This has since been swapped to the authentic version.

Deletion and redirect to the original is necessary as the image actively misleads and misinforms. There is no reason for other Wikimedia projects or reusers off-wiki to use this false colour version and continuing to host it on Commons will leave the door open for future mistaken reuse or further deliberate misrepresentation.

A bizarre false claim by the uploader Jan Arkesteijn is that the image is a derivative of File:William-Adolphe Bouguereau (1825-1905) - Nymphs and Satyr (1873).jpg. As the resolution of that claimed parent is smaller, and the EXIF in Arkesteijn's version actually states "Sterling & Francine Clark Art Institute", this is a clear mistruth. (talk) 14:59, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: In use. --Yann (talk) 09:16, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nominating both the current digitally manipulated version of this Lely painting and the original uploaded version rather than using a revert. Neither appear to correctly colour match the source given, so must be considered deliberately misleading. Further careful forensic examination of the EXIF data of the two files raises concerns. The original upload has no meaningful data, while the current version gives credit to the NRC which appears false. The photograph does not appear to have been taken or commissioned by them.

Unless Jan Arkesteijn is prepared correctly to explain their sources, so that a colour correct version can be uploaded, and a correct attribution can be given to the photographer and institution, this file is misleading, so should not be used on Wikipedia articles, and in terms of moral attribution misrepresents the source. (talk) 15:48, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: In use. --Yann (talk) 09:16, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No conceivable encyclopedic use - this is not a notable parody logo. (Also, the image has a nice little CC-BY-NC-ND logo in the bottom right.) B (talk) 17:32, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 09:17, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP in Slovenia. Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:20, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. xplicit 06:32, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appear to be taken from a book (or other stuff), may be a derivative work. B dash (talk) 10:05, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --xplicit 02:55, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image has been previously published [4] (2018-05-22). It should go through COM:OTRS. 4nn1l2 (talk) 23:02, 7 November 2018 (UTC) I am the copyright owner, it was sent to several news sites for free use. the person - Thamir Ghadhban - in discussion is my father. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zoozth (talk • contribs) 06:50, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Verification from the copyright holder, which is generally the photographer, is required. --Majora (talk) 03:55, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dit beeldhouwwerk is gemaakt door Kyōko Asakura (1925 - 30 mei 2016) in 1988[1], nog steeds auteursrechtelijk beschermd. --トトト (talk) 12:49, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination - FoP in Japan for buildings only. --Эlcobbola talk 19:16, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dit beeldhouwwerk is gemaakt door Keiko Amemiya (1931 - ) in 1992[1], nog steeds auteursrechtelijk beschermd. --トトト (talk) 11:21, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination - FoP in Japan for buildings only. --Эlcobbola talk 19:16, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photo has been uploaded to Wikimedia Commons without consent by the photographed person, Hannah Svensson. She has sent several e-mails to me, as a volunteer and administratör at svwp, requesting the swift removal of the photo from Wikimedia Commons. The uploader, Sven Rosborn (talk · contribs), has also contacted me with the same wish. There is an ongoing process to produce another, to all parties acceptable photo of Hannah Svensson. Paracel63 (talk) 14:33, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A replacement photo has been found, and licence has been acknowledged by photographer. Pending OTRS ticket (#2018111510006868) is now in the sv-permission queue. All the best.—Paracel63 (talk) 14:11, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I had previously uploaded one of my older photos of Hannah Svensson. After she contacted me and wanted to have a new photo, I of course have accepted this. However, this new photo was deleted because I didn’t know who the photographer was. However, now Paracel63 has been given permission through contacts with the photographer. I therefore hope that the new photo can be inserted into the article. I do not mind if you delete my old photo of Hannah Svensson.--Sven Rosborn (talk) 13:36, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Subject consent is not required, and personality rights are non-copyright restrictions which are explicitly not grounds for deletion (unless made in a private place where the subject had a reasonable expectation of privacy--not the case here). That said, however, I have no reservation deleting the image as a courtesy iff an appropriate replacement is provided. Although File:Hannah Svensson 2016 (IMG 8367-RE).jpg is offered, the current OTRS ticket is not valid, as permission was forwarded rather than provided directly from the author. Accordingly, this image should remain until that issue is resolved, at which time this image can be revisited. --Эlcobbola talk 19:30, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Update: Deleted: Permission issue with File:Hannah Svensson 2016 (IMG 8367-RE).jpg resolved. This image thus deleted as a courtesy, per above. Эlcobbola talk 16:23, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The work is not by Edmund Tarbell. At the End of the Porch by John Sherman./http://collection.imamuseum.org/results.html?query=john+sharman&has_image=T Morwana (talk) 20:42, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Эlcobbola talk 19:36, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not the uploaders own work. Taken from the internet 188.99.125.253 22:57, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Can't find it on the internet. Proof? --Markscheider (talk) 18:13, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Copy on [5], but from 2012. Yann (talk) 09:20, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: COM:PRP - low res, no camera EXIF, all uploader's other images deleted as copyvios. --Эlcobbola talk 19:41, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

---

Dear Mr. Taivo. Excuse me, but I do not know how or where I should respond to these cases on Wikimedia. My experience is recent.

I am writing to answer your questions based on the complaint about the photographic image of Mr. Reinaldo Bolívar.

This photo was captured by Mr. Keimy Fernandes, assistant of the then Vice Chancellor of Venezuela for the people of Africa who received from Mr. Bolívar, his cell phone to cover this event. Mr. Keimy does not work professionally in photography, so there can be no reference on the Internet to verify his authorship.

We would appreciate, please, that you indicate what actions we must take to provide authenticity to this photo and then repair this lack of information that exposes an authentic work to these judgments, based on arguments that, we recognize, can lead to this type of confusion.

Sincerely,

Adrián Prado

Estimado Sr Taivo. Discúlpeme, pero no se cómo ni donde debo responder estos casos en Wikimedia. Mi experiencia es reciente.

Le escribo para atender sus dudas basadas en la denuncia acerca de la imagen fotográfica del Sr. Reinaldo Bolívar.

Esta foto fue capturada por el Sr. Keimy Fernades, asistente del entonces Vice Canciller de Venezuela por los pueblos del África quien recibió del Sr. Bolívar, su celular para la cobertura de este evento. El Sr Keimy no se dedica profesionalmente a la fotografía, por lo cual no puede haber ninguna referencia en el Internet que verifique su autoría.

Agradeceremos, por favor, que usted nos indique que acciones debemos tomar para brindarle autenticidad a esta photo y entonces reparar esta falta de información que expone una obra auténtica a estos juicios, basado en argumentos que, reconocemos, pueden llevar a este tipo de confusiones.

Atentamente,

Adrián Prado

--Apradoc (talk) 04:05, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please open COM:OTRS page and look, what kind of e-mail should be sent to Commons permissions department. The permission must come from copyright holder, that means from Keimy Fernades, but if this is work for hire, then from Reinaldo Bolívar. You have generally one week for that. If the permission is late and the photos will be deleted meanwhile – no problem, after receiving and processing the permission the photos can be restored. Taivo (talk) 07:30, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per above - permission from Mr. Fernades needs to be provided using the process at COM:OTRS. --Эlcobbola talk 20:19, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

With some minor folding and reflection, appear to be taken from a book (or other stuff), may be a derivative work.

B dash (talk) 10:07, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Only one in use was the 1951 photo that was definitely not "own work". --Majora (talk) 20:33, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

interesting image, but not covered by FoP Germany. This image is taken from within the station building on places which are definitely not publicely accessible. Sorry but no choice other than deleting 84.19.213.249 15:36, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Question But does the image show anything copyrighted? It's part of the construction that holds the façade, not meant for public view (I assume, as you say "definitely not publicely accessible"), so is this copyrighted "architecture" or merely non-copyrighted "engineering work"? Gestumblindi (talk) 02:53, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I fear that it is part of a certain "architecture". According to this magazine information and various information at the architects' website it was intented to open the station to the city, there is obviously more idea beyond than only engineering to hold the façade. They have used steel, yes, but obviously not in a random or ordinary manner. 89.14.81.23 19:12, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Well, then  Weak delete - but I leave this open for another admin to decide, maybe someone who is more of an architecture buff than me. Gestumblindi (talk) 20:45, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:22, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]