Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Voodoo Robotics
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Star Mississippi 03:27, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Voodoo Robotics (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
End-to-end WP:PROMO. Improperly sourced, lacks WP:RS. Fails WP:NCORP. Hence, calling for an AfD discussion. - Hatchens (talk) 06:50, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Business. Hatchens (talk) 06:50, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Technology, and Texas. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 07:10, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete: as per nom, from start to finish, this is purely promotional - WP:PROMO. I checked to see if this was an SPA. Drat, the editor has contributed to Tooth fairy ! --Whiteguru (talk) 22:18, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
- If there is a portion of this that you think I should remove, please let me know. The company is legitimate. Bschoenb (talk) 15:23, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.