Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Princess Anna of Bavaria

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Tone 07:07, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Princess Anna of Bavaria

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Looks like deposed monarchy cruft, no sourcing to indicate that she is a notable author. PatGallacher (talk) 16:21, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:46, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:46, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:46, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep, I think she's notable enough as author and journalist (though the sources in the article don't really show that). Having an article about her and none about her husband seems about right. —Kusma (t·c) 20:47, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
And move to Anna von Bayern, her real name that she uses as author and journalist. —Kusma (t·c) 13:12, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Notable as writer/journalist - other languages also have articles about her but not about her husband. Oleryhlolsson (talk) 07:20, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete deposed monarchy cruft pure and simple. We do not defer to other language Wikipedias.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:28, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I know (as for the languages), I was merely elaborating on Kusma's point, that her husband don't have an article. Oleryhlolsson (talk) 01:45, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep for the reasons that Kusma mentioned earlier above here. Futurist110 (talk) 00:39, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Off-topic, but where is the deletion log for her husband's Wikipedia article? I can't find it! Futurist110 (talk) 00:43, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Could it be, that he never had an article in the first place? I don't know..... (but you can find an article about him in Greek if you are realy interested!). Oleryhlolsson (talk) 01:40, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nope; he did. I clearly remember his article even from just a couple of months ago. Futurist110 (talk) 06:08, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Futurist110, digging through the history of d:Q7244150, it was PROD-deleted as Manuel von Bayern. Here's the deletion log. —Kusma (t·c) 08:43, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Still a notable author. TheodoreIndiana (talk) 03:00, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep: The princess may not be notable as a member of the former Bavarian royal family but as stated by Kusma, she seems to be notable as an author. She is also the Chief Corporate Affairs Officer at Coty Inc.[1]. Both factors combined together amount to a certain level of significance. TheRedDomitor (talk) 10:07, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I'm curious why there is so many Weak Keep's when there is virtually no coverage of this person. There should be reviews on Wolfgang Bosbach but I can't see it. I don't see sufficient coverage to satisfy WP:SIGCOV nor multiple reviews to satisfy WP:NAUTHOR scope_creep^Talk 12:21, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[2], [3], [4], interview about the book. Not super great, but not "virtually no coverage". —Kusma (t·c) 13:11, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Move per Kusma. She appears to be best known as "Anna von Bayern." pburka (talk) 14:33, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
~~Delete~~ interviews do not count towards passing GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:55, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Please don't !vote twice. pburka (talk) 17:12, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  - Johnpacklambert pls stop your "delete bomb" on AfD. Why always do you want to Delete wikipedia articles?, I'm so pity to you! If you do not want to help on AfD, it's Ok but pls be quite! Do not disturb. Your ignorant votes are very damaged on some good article and lost. You did a same mistake (vote twice) on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Princess Maria-Olympia of Greece and Denmark (2nd nomination). So what is your problem? I apologize please stop.... Hi! Dad (talk) 17:43, 8 September 2020 (UTC),[reply]
    - You do need to apologize for being rude and for defending useless monarchy cruft like this.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:24, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as noted in the discussion there is sufficient coverage out there to warrant an article. - dwc lr (talk) 17:26, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep notable as journalist and writer. -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 22:40, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per all above. Notable writer. Ejgreen77 (talk) 10:53, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Move to her real name, not this pretend one, per Kusma.Smeat75 (talk) 21:26, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete None-notable author with a non-usable title. Typical monarchy fan-cruft. GenQuest ^{"Talk to Me"} 18:48, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep notable writer and position as Chief Corporate Affairs Officer at Coty Inc.. --Richiepip (talk) 03:08, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep As above, notable as journalist and writer.Deathlibrarian (talk) 05:50, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - per sourcing. Overall coverage and work within WP:GNG.BabbaQ (talk) 10:44, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I have added some sources and information to the article. I think there is sufficient evidence that she meets WP:GNG. VocalIndia (talk) 18:21, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.