Intracutaneous or subcutaneous sterile water injection compared with blinded controls for pain management in labour
- PMID: 22258999
- DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009107.pub2
Intracutaneous or subcutaneous sterile water injection compared with blinded controls for pain management in labour
Abstract
Background: Intracutaneous or subcutaneous injection of sterile water is rapidly gaining popularity as a method of pain relief in labour and it is therefore essential that it is properly evaluated. Adequate analgesia in labour is important to women worldwide. Sterile water injection is inexpensive, requires basic equipment, and appears to have few side effects. It is purported to work for labour pain.
Objectives: To determine the efficacy of sterile water injections for relief of pain (both typical contraction pain and intractable back pain) during labour compared to placebo (isotonic saline injections) or non-pharmacological interventions, and to identify any relevant effects on mode and timing of delivery, or safety of both mother and baby.
Search methods: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (30 May 2011), MEDLINE, and EMBASE (January 2010 to 30 May 2011), together with reference lists in retrieved studies and review articles.
Selection criteria: We included randomised, double blind, controlled studies using intracutaneous or subcutaneous sterile water injections for pain relief during labour. There were no restrictions on birth place, parity, risk, age, weight, gestation, or stage of labour. Potential comparators were placebo (saline) and non-pharmacological interventions (e.g. hypnosis or biofeedback).
Data collection and analysis: Two review authors independently assessed eligibility and quality of trials, and extracted data. We resolved any disagreements or uncertainties by discussion with a third review author. Primary outcome measures were at least 50% pain relief, or at least 30%, pain relief, patient global impression of change of at least 'good', mode of delivery, perinatal morbidity and mortality, maternal complications and adverse events. Secondary outcomes were women with any pain relief, use of rescue analgesia, and treatment group average pain relief. We made explicit judgements about potential biases in the studies.
Main results: We included seven studies, with 766 participants: four used intracutaneous injections, two subcutaneous, and one both. All reported on low back pain in labour only. Methodological quality was good, but four studies were at high risk of bias due to small size of treatment groups, incomplete outcome data, and performance bias.All studies reported treatment group mean or median scores, finding greater reduction in pain for sterile water. However, failure to demonstrate a normal distribution for pain intensity or relief, and use of different scales, meant meta-analysis was inappropriate. No study reported primary dichotomous efficacy outcomes. One reported the number self-scoring 4/10 cm or more reduction in pain; significantly more had this outcome with sterile water (50% to 60%) than with placebo (20% to 25%).There was no significant difference between sterile water and saline for rates of caesarean section (risk ratio (RR) 0.58, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.33 to 1.02), instrumental delivery (RR 1.31, 95% CI 0.79 to 2.18), rescue analgesia (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.44 to 1.69), timing of delivery, or Apgar scores. Two studies reported that more women treated with sterile water would request the same analgesia in future.No study reported on women's satisfaction with pain relief, women's sense of control in labour, women's satisfaction with the childbirth experience, mother/baby interaction, rates of breastfeeding, maternal morbidity, infant long-term outcomes, or cost. No adverse events were reported other than transient pain with injection, which was worse with sterile water.
Authors' conclusions: The outcomes reported severely limit conclusions for clinical practice. We found little robust evidence that sterile water is effective for low back or any other labour pain. Neither did we find any difference in delivery or other maternal or fetal outcomes. Further large, methodologically rigorous studies are required to determine the efficacy of sterile water to relieve pain in labour.
Similar articles
-
Relaxation techniques for pain management in labour.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Mar 28;3(3):CD009514. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009514.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. PMID: 29589650 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Pain management for women in labour: an overview of systematic reviews.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Mar 14;2012(3):CD009234. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009234.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012. PMID: 22419342 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Hypnosis for pain management during labour and childbirth.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 19;2016(5):CD009356. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009356.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016. PMID: 27192949 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia for pain management in labour.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 21;5(5):CD000331. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000331.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. PMID: 29781504 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Acupuncture or acupressure for pain management during labour.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Feb 7;2(2):CD009232. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009232.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020. PMID: 32032444 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Impact of fetal spine alignment according to maternal lateralization during early labor on maternal comfort and birth outcomes: A prospective cohort study in Kelantan, Malaysia.Eur J Midwifery. 2024 Sep 2;8. doi: 10.18332/ejm/191737. eCollection 2024. Eur J Midwifery. 2024. PMID: 39224531 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy of intraosseous saline injection for pain management during surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars: a randomized double-blinded clinical trial.J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2023 Jun;23(3):163-171. doi: 10.17245/jdapm.2023.23.3.163. Epub 2023 May 26. J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2023. PMID: 37313268 Free PMC article.
-
Vaginal Birth at Term - Part 1. Guideline of the DGGG, OEGGG and SGGG (S3-Level, AWMF Registry No. 015/083, December 2020).Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2022 Nov 3;82(11):1143-1193. doi: 10.1055/a-1904-6546. eCollection 2022 Nov. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2022. PMID: 36339636 Free PMC article.
-
Sterile water injections for relief of labour pain (the SATURN trial): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.Trials. 2022 Feb 16;23(1):155. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06093-3. Trials. 2022. PMID: 35172876 Free PMC article.
-
Effectiveness of injecting lower dose subcutaneous sterile water versus saline to relief labor back pain: Randomized controlled trial.Eur J Midwifery. 2018 Mar 14;2:3. doi: 10.18332/ejm/85793. eCollection 2018. Eur J Midwifery. 2018. PMID: 33537564 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical