Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2014 December 2

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:14, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Donate Life Rose Bowl Parade Float 2013.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• ORTS tag lacks parameters and there is no evidence of permission. Eeekster (talk) 03:09, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:14, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:YRT Monthly Pass.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• see c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:YRT Monthly Pass.png Magog the Ogre (t • c) 03:18, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:14, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:USNS Maury (AGS-39) Sea Trials.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• EXIF indicates image was created by BETHLEHEM STEEL CORP. If so, the license tag is not valid. Eeekster (talk) 12:25, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• According to the http://research.archives.gov/description/6440816, the creator is the Department of Defense, Department of the Navy, Naval Imaging Command. The website further states this image is "Released to Public" and "Access Restriction(s): Unrestricted" and is therefore public doman according to http://www.archives.gov/faqs/index.html#copyright Coffee Atoms (talk)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:14, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tomas Cloma Statue.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This statue is in the Philippines. There is no freedom of panorama in the Philippines (see c:COM:FOP#Philippines and as the creator of the statue isn't given no establishment that the statue is out of copyright. Nthep (talk) 14:02, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Nomination also include duplicate image File:Cloma Statue.jpeg for which no OTRS ticket exists. Nthep (talk) 11:14, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:14, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:IndianactressDevoleena-Bhattacharjee-poses-lens-wedding-reception.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This is a non-free photo by Viral Bhayani, who is probably not the uploader. Psychonaut (talk) 19:53, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: clearly a copyright violation. This India Times wepage attributes the image to "Viral Bhayani". The uploader has several suspect images. ww2censor (talk) 11:18, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:14, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Anne de vries 01.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Photo looks like made in the 1950s. Photographer is not 70 years dead yet, so not PD. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 20:56, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: for this image to be licenced as shown would mean he was only 19 at the time of this photo. That is obviously not true. ww2censor (talk) 11:00, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:14, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Duo media3.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Copyright notice in the watermarked version. Eeekster (talk) 22:09, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: an obvious copyright image found on several websites by Tineye. This one clearly attributes the work to "DUO by Ole Scheeren © Buro-OS" and the prose confirms the architect which is at variance with that on the image here. The image is also found on the architect's website http://www.buro-os.com/duo/ and their copyright page http://www.buro-os.com/copyright/ only gives rights for educational use and everything else requires their written permission. There is no such permission. ww2censor (talk) 11:06, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.