Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/This Is the Life (Amy Macdonald song)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was that there is little support for deletion here, as Europe22 says it's a chart single. But it may be better for the organisation of the encyclopedia as a whole if it were merged to the article on the album. I will close this as "no consensus" and recommend that those interested in merging discuss the matter on the article's talk page. --Anticipation of a New Lover's Arrival, The 00:50, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This Is the Life (Amy Macdonald song)

Non-notable single. _{WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN} ^{aka john lennon} 20:25, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

yes it should be deleted for not being notable. She already has an entry for the album.--The Smoking Nun (talk) 20:26, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. ——Torc. ^(Talk.) 06:49, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep : Meets WP:N : the single was charted. Europe22 (talk) 03:18, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to album - Notability is met, but there's still not enough information to warrant an article separate from the album. Per WP:MUSIC: "A separate article is only appropriate when there is enough verifiable material to warrant a reasonably detailed article; permanent stubs should be merged to articles about an artist or album." —Torc. ^(Talk.) 03:02, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Btw, this article was created on February 11, 2008 (it isn't a permanent stub). There is also WP:CHANCE (even if I think this article will never be expanded... ;-)). Europe22 (talk) 02:47, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I think three weeks is enough of a chance for it to move beyond what it is now, and "permanent stubs" is just shorthand for 'articles that are highly unlikely to ever progress beyond stubs'. I'm not all that optimistic about this article's chances. That aside, the first part of that sentence still definitely does apply. —Torc. ^(Talk.) 04:21, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.