Jump to content

User talk:Truco: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 236: Line 236:
Hey SRX, is there any chance that you can comment on the [[Wikipedia:Peer review/Armageddon (2006)/archive1|peer review]] for [[Armageddon (2006)]]. I'd really appreciate it. Thanks! <span style="font-family: tahoma">'''[[User:iMatthew|<span style="color:#900">iMa<span style="color:#090">tth<span style="color:#4682b4">ew</span>]] ([[User talk:IMatthew|talk]])'''</span> 19:37, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
Hey SRX, is there any chance that you can comment on the [[Wikipedia:Peer review/Armageddon (2006)/archive1|peer review]] for [[Armageddon (2006)]]. I'd really appreciate it. Thanks! <span style="font-family: tahoma">'''[[User:iMatthew|<span style="color:#900">iMa<span style="color:#090">tth<span style="color:#4682b4">ew</span>]] ([[User talk:IMatthew|talk]])'''</span> 19:37, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
:Thanks, and I was actually trying to think of a way to expand the article to add more information and make it meet the FL criteria. (Maybe a list of results from all of the PPV's) <span style="font-family: tahoma">'''[[User:iMatthew|<span style="color:#900">iMa<span style="color:#090">tth<span style="color:#4682b4">ew</span>]] ([[User talk:IMatthew|talk]])'''</span> 21:37, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
:Thanks, and I was actually trying to think of a way to expand the article to add more information and make it meet the FL criteria. (Maybe a list of results from all of the PPV's) <span style="font-family: tahoma">'''[[User:iMatthew|<span style="color:#900">iMa<span style="color:#090">tth<span style="color:#4682b4">ew</span>]] ([[User talk:IMatthew|talk]])'''</span> 21:37, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
:I'm about to send you an email. If what I just saw is true this is huge news about WP:PW! <font face=tahoma>[[User:Steelerfan-94|'''<span style="background:Black;color:Yellow">SteelersFan''']][[User talk:Steelerfan-94|'''<span style="background:Black;color:Yellow">94''']]</font> 22:16, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:16, 16 September 2008

User:Truco
User_talk:Truco
Special:Contributions/Truco
User:Truco/Sandbox
Special:Prefixindex/User:Truco
User:Truco/Reviews
Home Chat Contributions Sandbox (2) Subpages Reviews
Archives: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24

Your comments are welcome to this list. Cannibaloki 18:53, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! Take a look now. Cannibaloki 23:24, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! Cannibaloki 00:22, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: HBK's PR

Hmm, where would I start? Who do you recommend? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 19:47, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ooh, good people to ask. But, somehow I got a feeling they will not be up for it, some of 'em.. But what the heck, its always good to ask. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 19:53, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Would it be desperate if I leave everyone the same message on their talkpages? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 20:06, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, cause I thought it be a little desperate from me if I left everyone the same message. Hey, so would it be cool if I asked your input on that "list" that I've sorta completed, not sure if I'm done or not? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 20:15, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Um, the number of the episode I copied from here as well as the plot, but expanding it a little bit. Also, due to the fact that I own the season and watching the episodes and summarizing it from there. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 20:30, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, but I get the feeling something is missing. I basically looked at The Simpsons (season 9) as an example, but I still get the feeling something is missing. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 20:47, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, that's true. Maybe I should put the list in my "future to-do list". So, whatever the outcome is for HBK's article, I'm gonna nominate JD'05 to FA. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 21:14, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Is that sarcasm? ;) Do you not think it has a chance? Joke's aside, so WillC left some feedback at HBK's PR and apparently in the article there's no mention of him being Grand Slam Champion, well, in the lead, but not in the article. Should I include it in the article or what? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 21:55, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I will add it and thanks for the feedback. But, in his his book, after he won the European title, someone acknowledge the fact that the had won every title in the company, but, in his WWE.com profile it says that his last title captured was the World Heavyweight title to "complete" the GSC. Now, I'm really lost. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 22:04, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Alright, I added it, hope it reads well. Also, I left a comment about adding info. from his PL. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 22:25, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'm gonna bother you again; in the Clique's influence section, Shawn lost the Euro title to "Triple H", now, in '97, Triple H went by "Hunter Hurst Hemsley" and often times referred to "Triple H", but how would I write a sentence, so that the reader doesn't get confused with the two names? Hope you understand what I mean. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 22:43, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Well, if this is brought up and other suggestions are mentioned, I'll change it to mentioned suggestion. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 22:52, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Responded to your comments. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 21:08, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
'Nother respond. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 21:30, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Have responded. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 20:33, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Added book sources. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 18:42, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yup, added book sources and replaced "moniker" ---> "ring names". --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 21:01, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FAC for No Mercy (2005)

Despite your words of advice, I have gone and nominated No Mercy (2005) for FA. I can understand why a PR would have been beneficial, but that seemed really unnecessary to me. Anyway, I thought I would just let you know that I have nominated it for FA. Cheers, --LAX 20:08, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I thought CompleteWWE.com was not a reliable source? --LAX 00:43, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It's used in SummerSlam, and somehow it passed with that used to source the match times. --LAX 00:45, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for signing my guestbook

The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
Thank you for signing my guestbook. LAAFan

RE:Moves

Done. Nikki311 03:40, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi SRX,

I understand that you're a professional featured lists reviewer. I was wondering if you could help me out with promoting an article. I've been working on Mark of the Year, and I'm trying to get it up to featured list status. What work is required to make it a featured list? Thanks in advance, --Superflewis (talk) 05:25, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi SRX, Thanks for the help! I've re-written the prose, added pics, and added a history section. I've also removed all the external links and made them references instead. Is the article ready to become a features list canditate? --Superflewis (talk) 04:58, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hi SRX, I've opened a peer review on the article. Thanks for the advice. . --Superflewis (talk) 13:46, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re:

Actually, I was thinking of adding some more, such as maybe a section for each pay-per-view, summarizing the events. iMatthew (talk) 12:00, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

Project Updates
This Month in Wrestling History
Professional Wrestling Article Stats
  • We have now reached our goal of getting the number of Stub-Class articles below 600. The current count is 586. It still would be greatly appreciated if anyone could help expand and/or source an article or two. A list has been placed on the stub article subpage of stub articles of well-known wrestlers that should be fairly easy to improve.
Professional wrestling
articles
Importance
Top High Mid Low Total
Quality
FA 2 5 7
FL 1 12 10 23
GA 5 24 59 88
B 1 17 65 201 284
C 1 14 76 91
Start 2 50 213 1767 2032
Stub 1 22 564 587
List 2 23 575 600
Future 2 16 18
Assessed 3 77 377 3273 3730
Total 3 77 377 3273 3731
Member News
Recent News
Collaboration of the Week
Cast your vote to select the collaboration for next week! — Nominate an article that could be greatly improved!
Deletion Debates
From the Editors

Contributors to this Issue:


DiscussionSuggestionsFeedback

Delivered: 15:12, 14 September 2008 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

Editing help

How'd you get the citation button your editor, again? I saw you mention it on the PW page but forgot to do it before it was archived. Tony2Times (talk) 22:49, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers. Tony2Times (talk) 00:41, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think I've covered all of your points, could you check to see if you agree.Shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 22:18, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your positive review.Shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 03:15, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Hey, how are you doing? I don't know why and I don't know what I'm thinking but I've decided to get TNA Bound for Glory to FL status and I thought to ask you what needs to be done to get it to FA standards? It has only had three events and TNA doesn't really have a history section on the event. Also would it be okay to use the 2008 logo because TNA keeps changing it every year?--WillC 03:25, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, first off I knew it was too short, I just wanted to know what would be the main points I would need to address in the article. I plan on finishing it today in a subpage where I've been working on it and hopefully your opinion will change then.--WillC 21:16, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Remember, you're talking to the guy who can't make an article that is smaller than 40 kilobytes. I'll get the article big enough somehow.--WillC 21:29, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

SummerSlam (2003)

It has been spoken, it is in three part, total time about 15 minutes. Let me know what you think. Darrenhusted (talk) 08:52, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've made ammendments per your comments on the FLC, I'd appreciate your input again if you would. REZTER TALK ø 14:26, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review

Hey SRX, is there any chance that you can comment on the peer review for Armageddon (2006). I'd really appreciate it. Thanks! iMatthew (talk) 19:37, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, and I was actually trying to think of a way to expand the article to add more information and make it meet the FL criteria. (Maybe a list of results from all of the PPV's) iMatthew (talk) 21:37, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'm about to send you an email. If what I just saw is true this is huge news about WP:PW! SteelersFan94 22:16, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]