User talk:Truco: Difference between revisions

Thank you for No Way Out (2004)! Miss you! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:00, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome

Ten years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:56, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

and again! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:58, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Home	Chat	Contributions	Sandbox (2)	Subpages	Reviews

Cross posted to all Kliq members

As you may or may not have noticed on The Kliq's talk page, I have added two temporary sections. In "Last Minute Nominations," you are free to add any pay-per-view nominations that you have recently thought of or forgot about earlier. If you have any, please add them. If you do not, please just write none, in that section, so we know that you've seen it at least. Also, in "Bring 'Em Backs," you can choose one pay-per-view that has been voted out, and bring it back into the running. All you have to do it choose the pay-per-view and add it to the "Bring 'Em Backs" section. If you would not like to bring back any pay-per-view, please again, write none, so we know you've seen it. Cheers! iMatthew 2008 22:00, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I would create the first one. As for the Hardcore title, everything look great. I can see nothing wrong with it. --Cheers, LAX 22:34, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I would. Even though that's not really my forte either, I'll fix anything that I can see. --Cheers, LAX 22:51, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. --Cheers, LAX 23:01, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I'd say nominate it. --Cheers, LAX 00:55, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I would wait. And, sorry for not help you two out. --Cheers, LAX 01:01, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I know, but I really wanted to display the box. : ( --Cheers, LAX 01:04, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, I'll do anything I can. What list would you want to work on next. --Cheers, LAX 01:09, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I totally forgot about that. I would love to help you work on that. --Cheers, LAX 01:12, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, why not? --Cheers, LAX 01:15, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No I will not be able to. I'm terribly sorry for "lying" to you. Once I looked at the article, I realized that it is much too complicated and would be easier if I were to work on something like this by myself. --Cheers, LAX 04:07, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for understanding, I really appreciate it. --Cheers, LAX 04:11, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have just sent you an e-mail about 'Batista.' --Cheers, LAX 04:19, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replied back. --Cheers, LAX 04:25, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Last Minute Nominations" and "Bring 'Em Backs" have closed. Please go back to the Kliq page and vote for the next round. P.S. I heard Batista was removed from the roster page, and was released. iMatthew 2008 18:45, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thanks for the update! Anything I can help with? iMatthew 2008 18:54, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Everything looks great. Keep up the good work. ;) --Cheers, LAX 18:55, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Aw, you took my job. ;) Do you want me to do anything? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 19:04, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, sir. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 19:09, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome. Hey, do you want me to combine the refs. in the lead or find new ones? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 19:12, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You know how you have "<ref name="List5"/>", do want me to do that to the lead or find new refs.? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 19:20, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Good that we understand each other. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 19:22, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I'll do it. Just let me add some refs. to SummerSlam '04. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 20:02, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. Hey, isn't there a limit on nominating FL's? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 20:11, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 20:27, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for NWO. :( --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 21:13, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I responded. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 21:19, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I know what you mean. A consensus should be made. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 21:32, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I know what you meant. Maybe, we should notify the Village people. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 21:43, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Policy. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 22:00, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You've been using that statement a lot, and incorrectly sometimes too. First it was in a topic about the Cruiserweight Championship in WT:PW and the second time was in a topic about Beverly Mullins and Beulah McGillicutty in Talk:World Wrestling Entertainment roster. The guy was asking a legitimate concern about the article's truthfulness of listing Beulah as contracted; this has been a doubt expressed by many other editors. Try to be more flexible next time :-D Cheers, Alex ^T/_C Guest Book 00:14, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you think the page was unfairly failed (which is what you seem to be insinuating) why don't you renominate it?

You claim I only enforce the vote stacking rules "during the 2007 WWE Draft FLC nomination". What makes you say this? I've never seen you involved in any FLC noms except your own, so how would you know? For your information, I have given the same lecture to quite a few users. By the way, you seem to forget that in that particular nom you were also chastised by Colin so don't say things like "he came up with this "rule"" unless you know what you`re talking about. -- Scorpion⁰⁴²² 05:35, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Truco! Can you go vote at The Kliq's talk page? Cheers! iMatthew 2008 16:01, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. And Congrats on one year of editing! iMatthew 2008 16:09, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lol. iMatthew 2008 18:24, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I was thinking about that the other day; can you please do it for me? You do not have to give me credit for the article if you don't want, I don't really mind. I'm just terribly sorry for not doing it like I said. : ( --Cheers, LAX 18:42, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've sent you an e-mail though Wikipedia. iMatthew 2008 18:55, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Did you get it. Btw, WrestleMania XIX can easily become a GA, IMO. iMatthew 2008 19:10, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I guess. And I replied as well. iMatthew 2008 19:13, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I agree. --Cheers, LAX 19:21, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, I've sent you an e-mail. --Cheers, LAX 19:22, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Happy "Late" One Year in Wikipedia day. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 23:16, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome. Can I give my support? Since, I did help you with it. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 23:22, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, okay. Are you still working on the Hardcore list? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 23:36, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, yeah, about that. Um, some of the "winners" don't show up in any of the results. See here and compare the list winners in the Hardcore list. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 23:45, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There not mention there either. For example Goldust, I couldn't find anything on that. The date, April 19, 2002. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 23:52, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, but I'll check. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:04, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Is the note about our project being the featured Wikiproject in the Signpost next week? If not, can you please add it, then I will notify him. iMatthew 2008 01:18, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what to write either. All it should say is that Our Wikiproject will be the the Featured Wikiproject in next week's edition of the Signpost. The Chronic, iMatthew, and Nikki311 will answer questions relating to the project here iMatthew 2008 01:30, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The reason we let him go was because of the warnings he received, not his lack of time helping out. iMatthew 2008 21:45, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I see no problem with adding a template. Either one would work. Nikki311 18:12, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

you forgot to sign.--CiNnAmonCrUchy 01:19, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just wanting to let you know that I will not be able to edit on Wiki for a while because my grandfather just died. The only reason i'm on is because everybody is upset and I just need to be alone for a while. but he was my BFF, sorry to get off track but just letting you know. SexySteelerFan 01:37, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter Issue XII — March 9, 2008

Project News No Way Out (2004) failed its nomination for Featured Article status; its nomination can be found here. List of WCW Hardcore Champions has been nominated for Featured list status; its nomination can be found here. Royal Rumble (2005), Over the Edge (1998), and Vengeance (2005) have been listed for Peer review. Please review these articles and make suggestions for how they can be improved in preparation for a Good article nomination. Their peer reviews can be found here, here and here. Dawn Marie Psaltis, Lisa Marie Varon, and Unforgiven (2004) have been elevated to Good article status. Don Kent (wrestler), Jos LeDuc, New Year's Revolution (2007), Ricky Banderas, SummerSlam (1994), SummerSlam (2007), No Way Out (2007) and Unforgiven (2005) are currently Good article candidates. WikiProject Professional wrestling will be the Featured Wikiproject in next week's edition of the Signpost. LAX, iMatthew, and Nikki311 will answer questions relating to the project here. Current Events Ron Killings is still being reported as having signed a WWE contract. As there is no reliable source for anything of the sort, be prepared for his name to be continually added to the WWE Roster article, and information about his return being added to his article. There is also, apparently, an audio interview with Killings where he states he will be returning to WWE with his old K-Kwik gimmick. Recent SmackDown! taping spoilers indicate that Killings has already debuted under the name Kwik Killings in a Dark match. However, no reliable source for this information has been found yet. Articles for Deletion Current: NWA Australian Championship. Kept: Lena Yada, Vicious and Delicious. Deleted: Callum Sprit, WWE Smackdown vs. Raw 2009, Road to WrestleMania Tournament, Gary Mei. Collaboration of the Week The article collaboration for March 3 through March 16 is Ric Flair. Please help to improve it to match the quality of an ideal Wikipedia professional wrestling related article. The next article for collaboration will be chosen on Sunday, March 16. Cast your vote to select the collaboration for next week! — Nominate an article that could be greatly improved! Member Interview This week's interviewees are D.M.N. (link) and 3bulletproof16 (link). Next week's interviewees are FamicomJL and Naha. Submit a question to ask them here.

Member News Based on the members list, there are currently 351 members participating in WikiProject Professional wrestling. Based on the active members list, there are currently 40 members currently active in WikiProject Professional wrestling. NOTICE: If you are actively editing and contributing to articles under the scope of WikiProject Professional Wrestling, we suggest you add your name to the list of active members. On the calendar: Mar. 9 - TNA presents Destination X Mar. 25 - Kelan's birthday Mar. 26 - Govvy's birthday Mar. 30 - WWE presents WrestleMania XXIV Professional Wrestling Article Stats Since the last newsletter, the number of stub articles has dropped by 45 while the total number of wrestling articles continues to grow. A list has been placed on the stub article subpage of stub articles of well-known wrestlers that should be fairly easy to improve. Please check it out and see what you can help with (even if you can only add a few details or a couple of references). Professional wrestling articles by quality and importance Quality Importance Top High Mid Low NA ??? Total FA 2 3 7 12 FL 1 26 44 71 GA 10 109 217 1 337 B 11 41 140 350 6 548 C 9 51 304 1,791 62 2,217 Start 2 47 339 5,179 163 5,730 Stub 2 285 1 38 326 List 1 65 1,183 41 1,290 Category 3 22 2,299 2,324 Disambig 1 1 21 23 File 1 1 1,684 1,686 Redirect 1 11 105 649 766 Template 2 7 112 806 927 NA 6 115 121 Draft 1 13 14 Assessed 22 157 1,011 9,303 5,588 311 16,392 Unassessed 1 1 Total 22 157 1,011 9,304 5,588 311 16,393 WikiWork factors (?) ω = 41,716 Ω = 4.56 From the Editors Contributors to this Issue: iMatthew (talk · contribs) LAX (talk · contribs) Nahallac Silverwinds (talk · contribs) NiciVampireHeart (talk · contribs) NimiTize (talk · contribs) ThinkBlue (talk · contribs) Truco9311 (talk · contribs) Zenlax (talk · contribs) Discussion • Suggestions • Feedback

My brother was in a car accident and I'm currently at the doctors. To all Kliq members I PROMISE that I will be back right after Wrestlemania (if I go). Sorry for the inconvenience, but life is life, right? Sorry :( be back soon NimiTize 19:29, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I saw your post on WP:PW about a project ad. And since there's no reply since my offer, I might as well bring it up to you that I would like to make the project ad. Is there anything in particular you'd like to have in it? -- Oakster  Talk  07:30, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sure I'll be able to get one up by this weekend. Thanks for the details. -- Oakster  Talk  23:19, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good so far. One thing that I don't like, however, is when you use the dates like: 23 February 2003. To me, that doesn't sound or look right; however, I know that it is perfectly fine to write like that. –Cheers, LAX 23:23, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I'm talking about how you write the day before the month when writing the dates. –Cheers, LAX 23:54, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, for some reason it, as it is in every PPV article now, appears with the day first. I wonder why? O_o –Cheers, LAX 00:21, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Same with the sig dates. –Cheers, LAX 00:22, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your writing it fine, it was a misunderstanding. But, look at the PPV articles, the sig dates, and day articles (ie. January 2). The all appear to have the day before the month, despite writing it like: [[Month day]]. Uh, does that make any sense? –Cheers, LAX 00:30, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I thought that was how you were writing it, but I then realized that it must be something with Wikipedia. –Cheers, LAX 00:52, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for bothering you with all my BS above. It turns out it was something I had set in my preferences. –Cheers, LAX 02:18, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, which sandbox? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:49, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What do you want me to work on? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:54, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. What were the Raw feuds? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:59, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You got it. ;) Hey, how's the WCW Hardcore list going? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:06, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That sucks. :( Why does the guy want more "opinions"? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:13, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

We should stay positive. ;) Who knows, after we're done with NWO, it can probably become a future GA. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:27, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

True, their "corrupt". ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:39, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Do you want me to edit now? So we don't get involved in an "edit conflict". --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:43, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, okay. I just wanted to know. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 03:03, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Question: Can I use Online World of Wrestling? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 03:04, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cool, cause I just wanted to check and not piss you off. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 03:08, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I did and buenas noches. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 03:13, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Here's 411mania's NWO report. –Cheers, LAX 10:25, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Not at the moment, but I'll go looking for some. –Cheers, LAX 21:11, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Can I do that a little later tonight? I was planning on getting off. –Cheers, LAX 21:31, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		For all your hardwork on reverting vandalism. SexySeaShark 16:17, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've got the main jist of the banner worked out now, I'm just working on making it a tad bit fancier. I could do with some help though. Seeing as we have a lot of free images hanging around, I'm thinking of adding some pictures to your captions. The only restriction is that they shouldn't be obstructed by any ropes. Any suggestions?

Also, I'll let you know that it will feature the PW barnstar at the end as well as this image as it's perfect for animation. -- Oakster  Talk  17:24, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey just wanting to let you know that i'm back and trying to find a good artcle to start, I got a lot of free time since football season is over :) any suggestions? SexySteelerFan 22:02, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]