User talk:Truco: Difference between revisions

Thank you for No Way Out (2004)! Miss you! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:00, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome

Ten years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:56, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

and again! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:58, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Home	Chat	Contributions	Sandbox (2)	Subpages	Reviews

This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 21, 22, 23, 24

Just to let you know, I've finished the Angle/Lesnar feud for WrestleMania XIX. The only thing I didn't do is source it. I hope you're okay with this. If not, let me know and you can rewrite it yourself. Thanks. --LAX 22:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

PWWEW.net, 411mania.com, and OWW.com. I you'd like, I could source it later. --LAX 22:47, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I will, either later tonight or tomorrow. --LAX 23:06, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I know we've talked about this before and I don't want to start a conflict between us, but is it really necessary to include the year ever time when mentioning the date (ie. March 20 → March 20 2003)? --LAX 01:51, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Even though I said I was going to, thanks for sourcing the Angle/Lesnar feud for me. --LAX 20:07, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I'd love to. What would you like me to do? --LAX 20:10, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to do both and finish the background, If that's okay with you. --LAX 20:13, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. ;) Not if it can be sourced. A source for the theme song could be the DVD itself. --LAX 20:18, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The BG is really my forte. I might need some help with the aftermath, but I think I pretty much got it down. --LAX 20:25, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That's cool. I'm currently reading for information on the McMahon/Hogan feud. --LAX 20:37, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. I'm still reading and should have the first feud in soon. --LAX 21:05, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

'kay. I'm goin' kind of slow with the BG, but I'll have it in, don't worry. --LAX 21:36, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No doubt about it. --LAX 21:45, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You think that'll be alot, check out SummerSlam. It's got 74 sources total, with 40 of those in the background section alone. --LAX 21:56, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Is what I have right now good so far? --LAX 22:00, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I still have some more to do with that. What feud should I do for RAW, Jericho/HBK or HHH/Booker? --LAX 22:21, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I guess I'll do the HHH/Booker feud since I was thinking the same thing. --LAX 22:30, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

For the Rock/Austin and HHH/Booker feuds? --LAX 23:42, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Will do my friend. Again, I may need your help as that is not my strong spot. --LAX 00:04, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What article is the image going to be in? --LAX 00:07, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, okay. Well, pick one or the other. --LAX 00:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No. I'm sorry for deleting the Owen pic. Endlessdan pointed out to me that it is more than likely a fan photo and that WWE doesn't own the copyright (see here for the discussion). --LAX 00:18, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Done (see here). --LAX 00:20, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yup. --LAX 00:21, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good based on a quick scan. Is it okay if I finish the background and aftermath tomorrow? I'll make it my top priority. --LAX 00:41, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. ;) --LAX 00:52, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. Truco, you've just made made day. --LAX 00:55, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Look good. Great job sourcing it. --LAX 01:02, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please help me find when the McMahon/Hogan match became a street fight? I've been reading, and I'm lost. O_o --LAX 13:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I was reading that over and over again, and I guess it slipped my eye. BTW, the brand extension look really nice, great job. --LAX 15:00, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I know. I was confused when I saw nothing there, so I looked at your contributions and saw that you were working on it in your sandbox. Right now I'm working on the background for Unforgiven for Blue, but later I will finish on the background and start the aftermath. --LAX 15:11, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not that I can think of. --LAX 15:24, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I know. Maybe you could use the colors from the RR articles? --LAX 15:35, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A long apology from an old friend of Blue and I. He, before he "retired," was having personal issues and for no reason, started to go on a vandalism spree (which included both of our userpages). He has since come back and apologized to both of us for his actions. --LAX 15:44, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. It looks really good. I would go ahead publish it. --LAX 12:32, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No. I'm sorry I didn't work on it any further yesterday. I'll get working on it today. --LAX 17:07, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I just changed my header, on my userpage without the small "e", and if you mind can you check to see if the coding and everything is ok?. Thanks. NimiTize 00:33, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks man, and yea am pretty much learning alot from you and such others. But I pretty much know alot.  ;) NimiTize 00:49, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh. Okay so, for example, this is the current text: The Hell in a Cell match between Shane and Vince McMahon and the Big Show versus D-Generation X (Triple H and Shawn Michaels) was up next. DX took the advantage in the match, as they were able to get the upper hand over the McMahons and Big Show. Back and fourth action took place between the teams. During the length of the match, Triple H wrapped a chair around Shane's neck, which followed with Michaels hitting an elbow drop onto the chair, which resulted in Shane being injured. DX pulled Big Show's trunks down, after Michaels hit Big Show with Sweet Chin Music and shoved the elder McMahon's head up Big Show's buttocks. DX won the match, after Michaels hit Sweet Chin Music, which was followed by Triple H hitting McMahon with a sledgehammer and covering him for the win. I should replace HHH with ----> During the length of the match, Triple H wrapped a chair around Shane's neck... which was followed by HHH hitting McMahon with a sledgehammer and covering him for the win. Do I have it right? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:10, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, like Triple H (HHH)? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:15, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'll get to it. Question: How does Vengeance '05 look? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:25, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm on it. Question: Does the same date need to be linked twice? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:35, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah cause, on the Batista and Triple H feud "June 6" is mentioned and then on the Cena, Christian and Jericho feud "June 6" is mentioned again. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:38, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I feel you. ;) Hey, later can I run Unforgiven '03 through you? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:49, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, you know the basics and stuff. Here's a nickname from me to you ---> The PPV Genius. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:56, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I know, its sad. :( I hope we don't "break-up" and just see the Kliq fall before our very eyes. Alright, here you go ---> The main feud heading into Unforgiven was between Triple H and Goldberg battling for the World Heavyweight Championship. On the August 3 edition of Raw, Co-General Manager Stone Cold Steve Austin, announced an Elimination Chamber match for SummerSlam, in which Triple H would have to defend the World Heavyweight Championship against Goldberg, Shawn Michaels, Randy Orton, Chris Jericho and Kevin Nash. At Summerslam, the Elimination Chamber match came down to Triple H and Goldberg. Though, it saw Triple H win the match, after he hit Goldberg with a sledgehammer. Does it work? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:02, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Made the change. Umm, I really don't like adding the year, but if it needs to be added, then I'll add it. IDK, I'm neutral on it. Do you add the year? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:10, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I guess I'll add the year. So, how's WrestleMania 19 going? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:34, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That's good. Are you doing it alone? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:47, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'd help, but IMO, a WrestleMania article seems hard. Did you watch Raw in 2003? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:53, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh. Well, I didn't watch it either, I took a "hiatus". The only reason I asked, was maybe, you could fill me in with some info., but since you didn't watch it, I guess its back to the refs. Okay, how does the Background look so far for Unforgiven '03. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 03:13, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Umm, I'm pretty sure that's what happen in the Kane and Shane match. But yeah. I wanna run this through you. Triple H threw Goldberg a Going Away party does that work? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 03:21, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Better wording, thanks for the update. Are you serious? Okay, I'll go and remove the years. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 03:28, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, Kliq... (you know the story). Hey, in case Unforgiven '04 is reviewed and I'm not in sight, just sayin', do you think you can help out with whatever it needs to pass GA? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 03:35, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm just saying, cause, what happens if I "take a break" and the article is being reviewed and it fails. It'll break my heart. But, nice to know you will have my back on it. ;) Thanks, man. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 04:01, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I just took a glance on it and I hope that's the same thing with Unforgiven. IMO, I think I gave my best efforts on the PPV. Maybe after, I'll get Unforgiven '03 to the GA list. ;) P.S. Is it 11 over there in Maryland? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 04:13, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nevada and lucky you. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 04:18, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I'm okay. I think the earthquake happened in Reno. And, I live in Las Vegas. But, I'm fine. But, there was a shooting in my high school last week. But, I'm fine. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 04:22, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Aww, someone cares about me. ;) Anyways, Chronic did offer to "fix" my page, but he said he didn't have time, so.... Oh, is my page boring to you? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 22:50, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What type of theme? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 23:27, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blue, eh? I'll think about it. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 23:43, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cool then. I just wanted to let you know, cause that's what it says here. Hey, I was going to remove the last message from your talk page, as it doesn't make sense to keep, but its your page and I don't want to remove stuff without your permission and stuff. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 03:34, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good. In fact, it deserves a "Slammy" for it.

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		For spending night and day on creating the article. You should be proud. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 03:44, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your welcomes Truco. I wonder when I will get my Slammy. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 03:54, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, you should add the McMahon DVD as a ref. to the Brand Extension, since they do talk about Raw and SmackDown! being expanded and all. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 04:04, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'll start working on it and thanks for the barnstar. I really appreciate it. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 15:53, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good. Just, don't add a period after the ref. and your set. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 16:06, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'll give it a shot. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 16:46, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wait, on my talk page or at your sandbox. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 16:51, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

'Nother question: Do you want me to like add all the people that were drafted or you just want to see my table. P.S. I'll work on it in my sandbox. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 17:00, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good. Question: Is everyone going to have a Note next to them? (Like the one for RVD). --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 17:13, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just, wanted to make sure that RVD was not going to be the only one with a Note. Good job, though. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 17:33, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Is it PW consensus that they should be in order? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 17:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You should. I'm not the one to ask these kind of things. Sorry --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 17:50, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Truco. I've added the third feud to the background section. Is there anything else that needs to be done? Also, I appreciate your comments at the Vengeance peer review. Zenlax ^{T C S} 20:51, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Great. Then I'll wait for the automated peer review. I'd like to apologize for not working on Over the Edge (1998), I know that I gave you my word that I would of helped you expand it, but I've been busy with other expansions. If you need help on anything, please don't hesitate to leave me a message on my talkpage. Zenlax ^{T C S} 21:00, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It looks pretty good to me. Maybe shorten the length of the "Notes" section of the table though. TJ Spyke 05:38, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe combine them? Make Undertaker #1, Rock #2, etc. TJ Spyke 05:47, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It worked fine for the RR articles, so it should work. TJ Spyke 21:28, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That looks fine too. TJ Spyke 21:36, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Internet Archive. Here is the original page from WWF.com in April 2002 with the draft picks in the order originally posted: [1]. TJ Spyke 22:04, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Since the televised part was alternating (RAW, SD, RAW, SD, etc.), I would assume that you could do the same for the non-televised draft picks. It's your decision though. TJ Spyke 22:18, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

		The Special Barnstar
		Thanks for being a mentor to me and being a true Wiki freind, it does not go unappreciated. Steelerfan-94 22:21, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey i'm sorry will you be my freind if I quit blankeing pages? Newton-t (talk) 02:00, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

can you give me some advice on how to become a good editer here on Wiki? Newton-t (talk) 02:07, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

How are you? iMatthew 2008 15:05, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm doing great. If it's not too much trouble, can you go to WT:PW and give your opinion in the discussion I started about the "List of WWE Alumni" article. iMatthew 2008 16:29, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just wondering, but why don't you vote in the COTW? iMatthew 2008 17:15, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, ok. Just curious. BTW, did you know that S-Pac is on wikibreak. He wont be back for an unspecified period of time. iMatthew 2008 17:28, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That's what I thought. I opposed it from the beginning. I think that it should just be us 5 (You, me, Blue, LAX, and Zenlax) iMatthew 2008 17:50, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think we should. iMatthew 2008 19:36, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Can you bring it up to them on their talk pages? iMatthew 2008 19:42, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

K, I'll do it. iMatthew 2008 20:05, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done, and sure I'll help. What would you like me to do? iMatthew 2008 20:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What dates do the results need to be from? iMatthew 2008 20:19, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I tried doing it, but all of the sources I just added now link to the same site. I'm very confused. iMatthew 2008 20:42, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Are you ready for a nomination yet? I believe you are, but it's obviously up to you if you'd like to be nominated. You're 5 edits away from 5000 edits (as of this message). What do you think about this? iMatthew 2008 00:34, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Do you think you might be a good Admin? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:19, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think you would. But, one thing that would stand out would be your "feuds" with Mshake and other users. You did have a conflict with Mshake, right? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:26, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jeez, Truco. Calm down. Yeah, that would also stand out. But, you might have it better than me, since I was blocked three times, when I was Zerorules677. If I were you, I would wait a while. As I am waiting for the 10,000 edit mark. Just, try to calm down in situations. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:40, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I guess, that's just me. But, who knows, you might get the green light on it. Hey, can you check if my feud between Shane McMahon and Kane is written well. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:47, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, man. ;) Now that I think of it, you and I haven't written a PPV. Why is that? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:52, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I think that you would be a great admin. Maybe if you could try to settle your differences with Mshake. Offer to be friends, and if he declines, you can always say that you tried. iMatthew 2008 01:58, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. Which one did you have in mind? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:20, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

'03; since HBK took "some part" in a match at NWO. Hey, do you think working on a Royal Rumble article be easy to do? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:29, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, looks really good. Great job on sourcing everything. ;) --LAX 02:31, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rumble '03. Since I watched the PPV. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:32, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not "feuding" with you. I'm just annoyed with many (most?) of your edits and reasoning. Remember Armageddon? Gah! And seriously, will my opinion of you really have any effect on your application to be an admin? Of course not. I'm just another editor. Who cares what I think? Mshake3 (talk) 05:16, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm refering to this. That was some terrible reasoning. Mshake3 (talk) 00:13, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I'm just saying if its an easy article to do. But, I'm still down for NWO '03. Are you? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:44, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cool. When do you want to work on it? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:49, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Same with me. ;) Then, I'll see you in two weeks. Do you live far from Baltimore? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:10, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That sucks. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:25, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You did? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:31, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oofa. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:40, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I know. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:49, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Go to the Kliq page. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 23:12, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Did you read it? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 23:58, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Do you still think we should kick him out? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:07, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

We can do that and see what happens. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:21, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I was just wondering when do you think I will be able to Adopt someone? the reason I ask is because I have a freind that I know that wants to join Wiki am I ready? Steelerfan-94 00:50, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

O.K that's fair :) Steelerfan-94 01:04, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! I'm not at all trying to tell you how to teach your adoptees, but I think you should teacher Steeler-fan how to indent when sending messages. Just a thought, since he doesn't seem to know how yet. iMatthew 2008 01:14, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry but I don't know what you on indenting is that were you get bak to a user like RE: adoption? O hey I want you to look for me next week on RAW on March third in Indianapolis, is it O.K if I hold a sign that say's Hey Truco? Steelerfan-94 17:34, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

O.K I am either sitting at section six or eight I think eight I need to ask my mom, but look for a white semi tall kid that has a "Ruck fules" shirt on, I think the sign is going to say Hey Matt and Kevin!! what do you think? Steelerfan-94 19:54, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

O.K I think green I still have to go to Wall*Mart today after I help my family unpack 'cause we just moved to Clearwater, Florida, I had to use my dads cellphone yesterday. So do you want it to say Kevin or Truco is (is that like your middle name?). Have you ever been to a WWE event? Steelerfan-94 16:17, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It looks pretty good. Wait until it is finished first, as the Aftermath section still needs to be filled in. Nikki311 01:57, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

1)The article in the sandbox looks good enough to move to mainspace. 2)As for adminship, I had over 16,000 edits when I decided to accept the nomination. The more edits = the better. Also, a lot of people will oppose because of your past disagreements, including some evidence of losing your cool. I'd suggest putting some more time between the incident and an RfA. I also can think of a few users who oppose unless you have contributed to at least one Featured Article. Lastly, I'd like to see some more evidence that you know, understand, and follow the polices of Wikipedia. While all that isn't necessary, it will give you (and anyone else you may know who is considering a run at adminship) something to think about. 3)There is a lot of whitespace in the tables in the WWE Brand Extension. I'm not sure about a way to solve that problem, but it might be worth looking in to. Other than that, there are a few MoS problems but nothing to major. Nikki311 04:11, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ight ill chill dude just tell me how u figured out it was me —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rdrgz25 (talk • contribs) 04:44, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know, but I was reading WP:Signature and it said that is against policy because those signature pages are frequent vandal targets and can vandalize talk pages every time you sign. LessThanClippers (talk) 17:37, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter Issue XI — February 24, 2008

Project News AJPW Unified World Tag Team Championship failed its Featured list nomination. Its nomination page can be found here. Royal Rumble (2005) and Over the Edge (1998) have been listed for Peer review. Please review this article and make suggestions for how it can be improved in preparation for a Good article nomination. Their peer reviews can be found here and here. No Way Out (2004) and Torrie Wilson have been elevated to Good article status. Don Kent (wrestler), Unforgiven (2004), Lisa Marie Varon, SummerSlam (1994), Ricky Banderas, New Year's Revolution (2007) and Jos LeDuc are currently Good article candidates. This newsletter will now be issued every other week, per the discussion here. Current Events Former TNA professional wrestler Chris Harris has officially signed with World Wrestling Entertainment, as confirmed by himself in his personal website. Ron Killings is still being reported as having signed a WWE contract. As there is no reliable source for anything of the sort, be prepared for his name to be continually added to the WWE Roster article, and information about his return being added to his article. There is also, apparently, an audio interview with Killings where he states he will be returning to WWE with his old K-Kwik gimmick. Recent SmackDown! Taping spoilers indicate that he debuted under the name Kwik Killings in a Dark match. No reliable source has reported this as of now, however. Bobby Lashley has been released by WWE as of February 4 On February 7, WWE announced that it would cease it's affiliation with Ohio Valley Wrestling. Also on February 7, WWE announced that SmackDown would be leaving The CW at the end of the 2007-2008 Television Season. Articles for Deletion Current: Kept: Category:Jillian Hall albums; Velvet Sky. Deleted: Mike Posey; Randy Dodge; The Pit Bulls; Category:WrestleMania venues; WWE Byte This!. Collaboration of the Week The monthly featured article collaboration for February 24 through March 2 is Mr. Kennedy. Please help to improve it to match the quality of an ideal Wikipedia professional wrestling related article. The next article for collaboration will be chosen on Sunday, March 2. Cast your vote to select the collaboration for next week! — Nominate an article that could be greatly improved!

Member News Based on the members list, there are currently 338 members participating in WikiProject Professional wrestling. Based on the active members list, there are currently 36 members currently active in WikiProject Professional wrestling. NOTICE: If you are actively editing and contributing to articles under the scope of WikiProject Professional Wrestling, we suggest you add your name to the list of active members. LAX has been promoted to admin status. His RfA can be seen here. On the calendar: Feb. 17 - WWE presents No Way Out Feb. 24 - Steelerfan-94's birthday Feb. 28 - Zenlax's birthday Mar. 9 - TNA presents Destination X Mar. 25 - Kelan's birthday Mar. 26 - Govvy's birthday Mar. 30 - WWE presents WrestleMania XXIV Member Interview This week's interviewees are Kris Classic (link) and Alex Roggio (link). Next week's interviewees are D.M.N. and 3bulletproof16. Submit a question to ask them here. 3bulletproof16 has confirmed that he will indeed be taking part in the interview, even though he has retired. Professional Wrestling Article Stats Since the last newsletter, the number of stub articles has dropped by 45 while the total number of wrestling articles continues to grow. A list has been placed on the stub article subpage of stub articles of well-known wrestlers that should be fairly easy to improve. Please check it out and see what you can help with (even if you can only add a few details or a couple of references). Professional wrestling articles by quality and importance Quality Importance Top High Mid Low NA ??? Total FA 2 3 7 12 FL 1 26 44 71 GA 10 109 217 1 337 B 11 41 140 350 6 548 C 9 51 304 1,791 62 2,217 Start 2 47 339 5,179 163 5,730 Stub 2 285 1 38 326 List 1 65 1,183 41 1,290 Category 3 22 2,299 2,324 Disambig 1 1 21 23 File 1 1 1,684 1,686 Redirect 1 11 105 649 766 Template 2 7 112 806 927 NA 6 115 121 Draft 1 13 14 Assessed 22 157 1,011 9,303 5,588 311 16,392 Unassessed 1 1 Total 22 157 1,011 9,304 5,588 311 16,393 WikiWork factors (?) ω = 41,716 Ω = 4.56 From the Editors Contributors to this Issue: Alex Roggio (talk · contribs) GaryColemanFan (talk · contribs) Gavyn Sykes (talk · contribs) iMatthew (talk · contribs) LAX (talk · contribs) Nahallac Silverwinds (talk · contribs) NiciVampireHeart (talk · contribs) S-pac54 (talk · contribs) The Chronic (talk · contribs) The Hybrid (talk · contribs) ThinkBlue (talk · contribs) TJ Spyke (talk · contribs) Truco9311 (talk · contribs) Zenlax (talk · contribs) Discussion • Suggestions • Feedback

I've added some sources to lead for WrestleMania XIX. Anything else you would like for me to do? Zenlax ^{T C S} 20:43, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'll see what I can do. Zenlax ^{T C S} 20:56, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry... 70.234.154.58 (talk) 03:02, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nope. It is a fair use image, and since he is currently wrestling, a free use image should be avalable to obtain. Also, it has been tagged for not having a fair use rationale, so it will be deleted in seven days. --Cheers, LAX 10:35, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have to go to WP:CHU, and go through the process there. --Cheers, LAX 00:10, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nice. Any particular reason why you chose to have an X instead of 9311? --Cheers, LAX 00:19, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh. Yeah, you're current one is kinda long. --Cheers, LAX 00:23, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I saw your comments on the Major Brothers talk page and I brought the renaming discussion to the WP:PW's talk page. Your comments would be appreciated. --Endless Dan 15:23, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

re: Arch: Please check your tools - according to the edit history the page was reverted by you to previous by ClueBot but this did not restore several sections of deltion. Thanks, Leonard G. (talk) 01:48, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No........ Why are you changing it? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:50, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You mean like "Hunter Hurst Hemsley" ---> "Triple H"? P.S. What do you think of NimiTize joining the Kliq? This comes from LAX. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:55, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Goodbye Truco9311. iMatthew 2008 02:23, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, right now he and I are working on Backlash '05. And, he's been helping out with Unforgiven '03 and stuff. Is that good enough? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:25, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Truco X. coming soon, to a theater near you iMatthew 2008 02:30, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, we lost DMN and bulletproof and I don't see the harm in letting one more person join. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:32, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly. If he "slacks off" then we can kick him out. Are you working on anything? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:39, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Is that your spring break... break? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:46, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Same here. So, are we going to work on NWO '03 in March? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:51, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Just wanted to make sure if you didn't forget. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:56, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]