User contributions for Texasreb
Appearance
Results for Texasreb talk block log uploads logs global block log global account filter log
A user with 1,346 edits. Account created on 24 June 2006.
27 July 2015
- 19:0919:09, 27 July 2015 diff hist −9 m Deep South The whole of Florida is not usually considered part of the Deep South today.
6 April 2015
- 14:1514:15, 6 April 2015 diff hist +1,583 Talk:Confederate States of America No edit summary
- 13:2313:23, 6 April 2015 diff hist +6 Talk:Confederate States of America →Should we just delete Texasreb's Talk edits when they are cut and past disasters that foul up the discussion format and are unsigned?
- 13:2113:21, 6 April 2015 diff hist +2,178 Talk:Confederate States of America Undid revision 654984948 by Rjensen Undid Rjensen deletion which was on the talk page. There was no personal threat at all, and none intended. This kind of deletion stomps freedom to talk honestly, agree or disagree.
4 April 2015
- 23:5323:53, 4 April 2015 diff hist +119 User talk:Texasreb →Statement on Talk:Confederate States of America
- 23:5023:50, 4 April 2015 diff hist +328 User talk:Texasreb →Statement on Talk:Confederate States of America
- 23:4423:44, 4 April 2015 diff hist +9 Talk:Confederate States of America →Should we just delete Texasreb's Talk edits when they are cut and past disasters that foul up the discussion format and are unsigned?
- 23:4123:41, 4 April 2015 diff hist +2,178 Talk:Confederate States of America /* Reply
- 23:0523:05, 4 April 2015 diff hist +2,670 Talk:Confederate States of America Undid revision 654970591 by Rjensen So now RJensen is resorting to deleting honest talk opinions? What does this guy want?
- 22:2022:20, 4 April 2015 diff hist +2,670 Talk:Confederate States of America →Reagan Speech Inclusion
- 20:4720:47, 4 April 2015 diff hist +369 User talk:Texasreb Reply to Squinge
26 March 2015
- 22:0222:02, 26 March 2015 diff hist +1,244 User talk:Texasreb →Unblock Requests: reply to Squinge.
25 March 2015
- 01:2601:26, 25 March 2015 diff hist +1,083 User talk:Texasreb →Unblock Requests: reply
24 March 2015
- 02:3802:38, 24 March 2015 diff hist +7 User talk:Texasreb →Unblock Request: unblock request
- 02:1702:17, 24 March 2015 diff hist +2,107 User talk:Texasreb →Unblock Request
23 March 2015
- 14:0914:09, 23 March 2015 diff hist +1,918 User talk:Texasreb →March 2015: Request to unblock
- 05:2405:24, 23 March 2015 diff hist +43 User talk:Texasreb →Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
22 March 2015
- 23:2223:22, 22 March 2015 diff hist +666 Confederate States of America Undid revision 652867176 by [[Special:Contributions/North Shoreman| Undid unjustified deletion by NorthShoreman..
- 20:5820:58, 22 March 2015 diff hist −54 Talk:Confederate States of America →Reagan Speech Inclusion
- 20:5620:56, 22 March 2015 diff hist +1,368 Talk:Confederate States of America →Reagan Speech Inclusion
- 05:4005:40, 22 March 2015 diff hist +860 Talk:Confederate States of America →Should we just delete Texasreb's Talk edits when they are cut and past disasters that foul up the discussion format and are unsigned?
21 March 2015
- 12:5512:55, 21 March 2015 diff hist +1,577 Talk:Confederate States of America →Reagan Speech Inclusion: edit warning comment.
- 10:5210:52, 21 March 2015 diff hist +666 Confederate States of America Undid revision 652850902 by [[Special:Contributions/Red Harvest| Reverted unjustified deletion by Red Harvest. Now awaiting another deletion by same editor or another.
- 10:4810:48, 21 March 2015 diff hist +160 Talk:Confederate States of America →Should we just delete Texasreb's Talk edits when they are cut and past disasters that foul up the discussion format and are unsigned?
- 10:4410:44, 21 March 2015 diff hist +475 Talk:Confederate States of America →Should we just delete Texasreb's Talk edits when they are cut and past disasters that foul up the discussion format and are unsigned?
- 10:1710:17, 21 March 2015 diff hist +523 Talk:Confederate States of America →Should we just delete Texasreb's Talk edits when they are cut and past disasters that foul up the discussion format and are unsigned?
- 10:1110:11, 21 March 2015 diff hist +727 Talk:Confederate States of America →Reagan Speech Inclusion: edit for clarity and add signature. My mistake
- 07:0107:01, 21 March 2015 diff hist +45 Confederate States of America →Causes of secession
- 06:5106:51, 21 March 2015 diff hist +621 Confederate States of America →Causes of secession
- 06:4706:47, 21 March 2015 diff hist +1,991 Talk:Confederate States of America →Reagan Speech Inclusion: reply to all
18 March 2015
- 07:2407:24, 18 March 2015 diff hist +1,660 Talk:Confederate States of America →Reagan Speech Inclusion: new section
17 March 2015
- 16:5516:55, 17 March 2015 diff hist +1,264 Confederate States of America Undid revision 651774802 by talk) Undid revert by NorthShoreman. Excerpt of Reagan speech is extremely relevant to secession of Lower South. Also, no talk attempted before revision.
- 08:4508:45, 17 March 2015 diff hist +1,326 Confederate States of America Undid revision by Rjensen. . Wiki policy does not prohibit use of primary sources so long as used properly. No talk nor attempted done nor attempted
15 March 2015
- 18:3918:39, 15 March 2015 diff hist −2 m Confederate States of America →A revolution in disunion: correction of addition
- 16:5216:52, 15 March 2015 diff hist +51 m Culture of Texas provide links and eliminated parenthetical term as redundant, and took another word on the grounds of being too close to another just like it, replacing with an alternate.
- 16:3716:37, 15 March 2015 diff hist +1,328 Confederate States of America →A revolution in disunion: elaboration of Lower South reasons for secession
9 March 2015
- 23:2323:23, 9 March 2015 diff hist +26 m Talk:Confederate States of America →Dubious statement "Elliot's conclusions have been widely disputed by many Texan historians of the Civil War": minor revision for clarity
- 23:1923:19, 9 March 2015 diff hist +7,998 Talk:Confederate States of America →Dubious statement "Elliot's conclusions have been widely disputed by many Texan historians of the Civil War": comment
3 March 2015
- 23:1223:12, 3 March 2015 diff hist +902 Talk:Confederate States of America →Dubious statement "Elliot's conclusions have been widely disputed by many Texan historians of the Civil War": discrepancy between wording cited in the Elliott paragraph and what he actually said in his article. .
- 22:5222:52, 3 March 2015 diff hist 0 m Confederate States of America →Unionism: spelling correction.
- 22:4522:45, 3 March 2015 diff hist +7 m Confederate States of America →Unionism: added first name to Elliott as he had not been previously introduced in the article
- 22:4122:41, 3 March 2015 diff hist +621 Confederate States of America →Unionism: added opinions from a couple of historians which take issue with Elliot
- 22:2822:28, 3 March 2015 diff hist +1,371 Talk:Confederate States of America →Dubious statement "Elliot's conclusions have been widely disputed by many Texan historians of the Civil War": reply
2 March 2015
- 23:5723:57, 2 March 2015 diff hist +2,033 User talk:Jdcrutch →Hang in there with Confederate States of America Page
- 19:5719:57, 2 March 2015 diff hist +3,607 User talk:Jdcrutch →Hang in there with Confederate States of America Page: reply to J.D. Crutch on Texas v. White arbitration
27 February 2015
- 19:4819:48, 27 February 2015 diff hist +16 m Talk:Confederate States of America →Dubious statement "Elliot's conclusions have been widely disputed by many Texan historians of the Civil War": Ok I lied, I forgot one word insert. This is it, really! (at least for a while!).
- 19:3419:34, 27 February 2015 diff hist +559 User talk:Jdcrutch →Hang in there with Confederate States of America Page
- 19:2119:21, 27 February 2015 diff hist +44 m Talk:Confederate States of America →Dubious statement "Elliot's conclusions have been widely disputed by many Texan historians of the Civil War": one final clarification in intent and wording.
- 18:3718:37, 27 February 2015 diff hist +692 Talk:Confederate States of America →Dubious statement "Elliot's conclusions have been widely disputed by many Texan historians of the Civil War": add to last reply and a few minor corrections and some small additions for better clarity
- 13:5713:57, 27 February 2015 diff hist +10,547 Talk:Confederate States of America →Dubious statement "Elliot's conclusions have been widely disputed by many Texan historians of the Civil War": reply