User talk:Camw

Archives

2007 January 2007 March 2007 April 2007 September 2008 October 2008 November 2009 January 2009 February 2009 March 2009 April 2009 May 2009 June 2009 July 2009 September 2009 November 2009 December 2010 January

This page has archives. Sections older than 5 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III.

I noted your restoration of this disruptive and abusive edit.[1] There are several dozen more articles which were deleted. The issue is now at arbcom, and the admin is self-indefinitely banned.

Can you restore all of the deleted articles, from 22:54, 20 January 2010? [2] If not, could you WP:incubate them or userfy them for me? I will work on everyone.

I could create move shortcuts for you too. If you would rather not have these in main space.

You maybe interested in a group of editors who attempt to source articles which are put up for deletion.

Hello, Camw. You have been invited to join the Article Rescue Squadron, a collaborative effort to rescue articles from deletion if they can be improved through regular editing. For more information, please visit the project page, where you can >> join << and help rescue articles tagged for deletion and rescue. Ikip 06:41, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ikip, not sure if you are still around based on your user talk page message about scrambling your password - so I'd assume you wouldn't be working on them if they were restored or userfied, or are you working with a different account now? Camw (talk) 15:20, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind, just read the arbcom motion, I suppose that may be why you scrambled your password. Camw (talk) 15:25, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I found a loop hole, and emailed myself my password. I have been arguing on Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/Biographies of living people where editors who held consensus in "utter contempt" yesterday are now hypocritically trying to build consensus that support their views today.

Please do one of the three to those articles, (restore, incubate, or to my user space, preferably one of the first two) I hope I made it as easy as possible for you. I can create clickable moves, where it will automatically move from mainspace to userspace in one click. I can do that myself if needed. Ikip 22:24, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Good to hear you are still around. Based on the arbcom motion I don't think a mass restore would go down well, it seems certain editors/administrators are more equal than others when it comes to following those pesky rules (such as community consensus). What if I were to userfy 10 to you and I'll take 10 as well and see how we go? Camw (talk) 22:48, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why have you deleted the link? Austingh (talk) 03:33, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'll reply on your talk page. Camw (talk) 03:34, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The link which was removed was not spam link and neither was it about advertising. If you had observed the link purposefully, you would have noticed that it contained information pertaining to personal assistant. You have removed two vital links which were added to this wiki for no apparent reason at all. Choicehow is not a spam weblog. Thank you!Austingh (talk) 03:39, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I did observe the links and have replied on your talk page. Camw (talk) 03:48, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I don't have to waste my time on this wiki anyway. It's only generating nofollow links! Already, our articles are above your weak ones in search engine results. Obviously, a public domain cannot be venerative than a weblog which is copyrighted.Austingh (talk) 04:02, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]