User talk:GaryColemanFan

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

Gary! Thanks for your efforts in helping get Jason Dozzell to GA status. I really appreciate you doing this for me while I've been away. All the best. The Rambling Man on tour (talk) 11:19, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

		The Good Article Reviewer's Medal of Merit
		Well done for your outstanding work during the GAN backlog elimination drive. Peanut4 (talk) 16:09, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, GaryColemanFan. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Tiptoety ^talk 22:00, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On 10 November, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Royal Rumble (1993), which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Thank you for your contributions! - Cheers, Mailer Diablo 16:37, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, ok. I am awfully sorry about that. It was not myself. I'm not sure what was written. Please assure I will deal with the situation. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.198.59.109 (talk) 02:42, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've reviewed the Good Article nomination for Antonio Pugliese and have placed it on hold to allow you to fix some rather minor problems with prose and MOS. The review may be found here. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks. — Bellhalla (talk) 15:55, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations! Antonio Pugliese is now a Good Article. — Bellhalla (talk) 15:30, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review, I addressed your concerns here. Plus, since you wrote the criticism section, would you mind helping me out with it at FAC, if concerns come up?--S_RX 22:20, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:The Hybrid/Finger I know I've kinda ignored you but your right I was acting kinda childish before so I wanted to give you this as a piece offering. It's in good spirit in case your wondering. SteelersFan94 05:37, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Any chance you could help me format the references in the Rickrolling article? I've added a bit more context to the song and video. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 20:02, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry about it! ;) I've done that myself before. ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 18:49, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On 24 November, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Survivor Series (1992), which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 19:32, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just thought you'd like to know that I've given you a mention here. Sincerly, D.M.N. (talk) 17:53, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You think the PPV abbreviation idea is a good one? If so then apply it. Otherwise I'm ready to pass this for GA. I'm especially happy with the improvements to the lead as I think half the readers only fully pay attention to the first part of most articles :( Good work and keep on editing! (courtesy link) Sillyfolkboy (talk) 22:18, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think that as long as you spell it out ("pay-per-view") on its first instance along with it's abbreviation then it's perfectly encyclopaedic. Also, PPV is an abbreviation found throughout the wrestling world and it's respective press so I think it's perfectly acceptable usage. For example look at Irritable bowel syndrome: IBS is a commonly used medical acronym that may not be so well known outside of the medical world but it's usage is fine for that article. Sillyfolkboy (talk) 00:10, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The article has passed. Congratulations and thank you for being a responsive editor. Sillyfolkboy (talk) 00:47, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, that fifteen minute draw between Tatanka and Lex Luger sounds like the most painful match ever. At least the draw meant neither had to make a second appearance! You can guess the quality (or lack thereof) of a wrestler when his finisher is a running forearm. Oh dear... Sillyfolkboy (talk) 01:07, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problems, it was my pleasure. It's quite amazing what you and the PW wikiproject have achieved. I imagine it can get exhausting for editors to continually see wrestling articles but if other projects were similarly motivated then there wouldn't be such a disparity between topics. Indeed it's slightly embarrassing that I'm possibly the most prolific editor of sprinting articles; something I consider one of my lesser interests. Keep up with the good work and GA reviews! Sillyfolkboy (talk) 04:07, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On King of the Ring. What is the next article you're going to get to GA?--WillC 00:58, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, good luck with those. The backlog on the sports section is extremely long, I wish there were more GA reviewers. I should review an article but I don't have time and I'm unsure of myself. Hopefully you'll get lucky and get them reviewed soon. Well uf you do, it is either WrestleMania 8 or King of the Ring 95, I would choose Mania. A Featured Topic of all the Wrestlemanias would be good if there were enough people to work on them. I feel all articles should be of a featured quality, in this case WrestleMania definitely should be. Breaks are good, but wikipedia is addicting. Lets see if you can last.--WillC 03:53, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I didn't look edits, I just saw your comment on WP:PW. And don't worry Gary, I'll never contact you again. Also Have you ever heard of a little thing called Rollback right? I suggst you get it. SteelersFan-94 22:21, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Besides, I know you wouldn't message me back anyway, I just did that to give a piece offering. And don't ever tell me to grow up again, for all I know you could be ten.SteelersFan-94 22:31, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]