Talk:Project Appleseed

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Project Appleseed article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, 1Auto-archiving period: 61 days

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Firearms Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Firearms, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of firearms on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FirearmsWikipedia:WikiProject FirearmsTemplate:WikiProject FirearmsFirearms articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I restored the 'classification' section and named to back to 'criticism'. The editor who deleted it seems to have been mistaken about the nature of WP's NPOV policy. Also, the material is summarized in the intro and should be included in greater depth in the text. Rezin (talk) 21:43, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• I pruned the article a bit: it was more than a little excessive. I also tagged it for notability, since two national newspaper articles really isn't enough. What still needs to be resolved is the criticism of the politics of the joint; this article needs an NPOV rewrite. Drmies (talk) 02:06, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]