User talk:Dee03: Difference between revisions

Archives (index)

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 11, 12

This page has archives. Sections older than 10 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present.

Hi Dee03

Re adding to: Haryana, Goa, Vidarbha, J&K, Railways

Okay, but it might take me a couple of weeks to get to them all, and I do not know how much I can add yet.

Regards. Eno Lirpa (talk) 12:01, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Eno Lirpa: Thanks for the reply. I see you started expanding the Haryana list, but you added a couple of women's cricketers. Please remove entries of women cricketers as these lists are for men's cricket teams only. I am not sure how you are compiling these lists; the Haryana list looks like a duplicate of Category:Haryana cricketers with no additional information. We at WP:CRIC use CricketArchive for getting the entire list of cricketers who played for a particular team, e.g. I used this for creating the Delhi one. I know CricketArchive has a paywall now, but that can be easily breached. Dee03 10:16, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I will try to add some further information when I can. No promises for now though. I am quite happy for WP:CRIC to work on them. I only come to such pages in passing doing other work. The article does not say men only. If that is supposed to be the case then ALL such articles must be moved to List of male 'club-name' cricketers. If not, then such existing titling is completely biased and sexist. Eno Lirpa (talk) 11:42, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article begins with "This is a list of cricketers who have played first-class, List A or Twenty20 cricket for Haryana cricket team." Haryana cricket team is the men's cricket team and the women's cricket team is called Haryana women's cricket team. There is nothing biased or sexist about the title, it is based on WP:PRIMARYTOPIC, and you just misinterpreted the inclusion criteria for the list. You may start a List of Haryana women cricketers if you wish to counter the bias. Dee03 11:48, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dee03. I have worked on all of the above lists. Please let me know if there is anything more to be done sooner rather than eventually. If there are any others too, whether or not I created them, let me know if you would like them added to. Regards. Eno Lirpa (talk) 06:35, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, good work on the expansion. If you would like to complete the lists I can give you the CricketArchive links from which you can get the comprehensive lists for each team. No problem if you don't want to, someone from WP:CRIC will eventually pick them up and complete them. Dee03 13:49, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. If you want to provide them I am happy to have a look, but no promises as too how many and how soon. Eno Lirpa (talk) 11:37, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If i can help with any lists please let me know on my talk page. Eno Lirpa (talk) 12:57, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Dee03. I've seen you editing recently and you seem knowledgeable about Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Would you please consider becoming a New Page Reviewer? Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia policies and guidelines; currently Wikipedia needs experienced users at this task. (After gaining the flag, patrolling is not mandatory. One can do it at their convenience). But kindly read the tutorial before making your decision. Thanks. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 08:19, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

On 2 December 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Tarak Sinha, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Tarak Sinha coached 12 cricketers who went on to play at international level? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Tarak Sinha. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Tarak Sinha), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Dee03. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there, see this edit. I was already reverted these changes. HindWiki^Connect 14:20, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit was awaiting review in the pending changes log. Dee03 14:22, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OK, but I was already accepted. OK no matter, thanks HindWiki^Connect 14:25, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No, your edit was not automatically accepted because there were unreviewed pending changes before your edit (See WP:PC#Frequently_asked_questions). Thanks for the anti-vandal work though. Dee03 14:31, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]