User talk:95.147.174.120: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 15:24, 27 December 2011

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

95.147.174.120 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The block was placed by admin user TerriersFan without warning or discussion. The "warning" was a threat -- 'your last warning' (?) by a non-admin user for the crime of supposedly POV pushing. This appears to be a content dispute, surely? Which WP policies justify all this?

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2= The block was placed by admin user TerriersFan without warning or discussion.  The "warning" was a threat -- 'your last warning' (?) by a non-admin user for the crime of supposedly POV pushing.  This appears to be a content dispute, surely?  Which WP policies justify all this? |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1= The block was placed by admin user TerriersFan without warning or discussion.  The "warning" was a threat -- 'your last warning' (?) by a non-admin user for the crime of supposedly POV pushing.  This appears to be a content dispute, surely?  Which WP policies justify all this? |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1= The block was placed by admin user TerriersFan without warning or discussion.  The "warning" was a threat -- 'your last warning' (?) by a non-admin user for the crime of supposedly POV pushing.  This appears to be a content dispute, surely?  Which WP policies justify all this? |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Note to other users, this editor has edited under the IP address 99.52.102.177 (talk · contribs)

You should sign your statements, Mr Thompson. You're wrong, by the way. 95.147.174.120 (talk) 15:24, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

December 2011

This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Book of Revelation, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Regardless of one's stance on divine inspiration, the human hand which placed the words onto paper identifies himself as John, not God. Ian.thomson (talk) 14:43, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

To edit, please log in.

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience. TerriersFan (talk) 14:59, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments: 31 hours

Thank you for trying to keep Wikipedia free of vandalism. However, one or more edits you labeled as vandalism, such as the edit at Book of Revelation, are not considered vandalism under Wikipedia guidelines. Wikipedia has a stricter definition of the word "vandalism" than common usage, and mislabeling edits as vandalism can discourage newer editors. Please read Wikipedia:NOTVAND for more information on what is and is not considered vandalism. Thank you. Ian.thomson (talk) 15:00, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+{{unblock| The block was placed by admin user TerriersFan without warning or discussion.  The "warning" was a threat -- 'your last warning' (?) by a non-admin user for the crime of supposedly POV pushing.  This appears to be a content dispute, surely?  Which WP policies justify all this?}}
 Note to other users, this editor has edited under the IP address {{user|99.52.102.177}}
+:You should sign your statements, Mr Thompson. You're wrong, by the way. [[Special:Contributions/95.147.174.120|95.147.174.120]] ([[User talk:95.147.174.120#top|talk]]) 15:24, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
 == December 2011 ==