User talk:Mbz1/a7: Difference between revisions

This userpage has been blanked. If this is your userpage, you can retrieve the contents of this page in the page history. Alternatively, if you would like it deleted, simply replace the content of this page with {{db-u1}}.

• “The rain it raineth on the just
  And also on the unjust fella,
  But chiefly on the just, because
  The unjust steals the just's umbrella”

• w:Charles Bowen

• 'Would you tell me, please, which way I ought to go from here?'
  'That depends a good deal on where you want to get to,' said the Cat.
  'I don't much care where —' said Alice.
  'Then it doesn't matter which way you go,' said the Cat

• 'But I don't want to go among mad people,' Alice remarked.
  'Oh, you can't help that,' said the Cat: 'we're all mad here. I'm mad. You're mad.'
  'How do you know I'm mad?' said Alice.
  'You must be,' said the Cat, 'or you wouldn't have come here.'
  

On 12 December 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Ravens of the Tower of London, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the ravens of the Tower of London are enlisted as soldiers of the Kingdom, and can be dismissed for unsatisfactory conduct? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 12:04, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for your advice. I followed it, and just added references to the section on Christianity in Egypt. Please take a look at it and let me know what you think. Thanks again. --λⲁⲛτερⲛιξ^[talk] 17:17, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent! Thank you very much once again! --λⲁⲛτερⲛιξ^[talk] 17:43, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to bother you again, but please take a look at this and tell me what you think: [1]. --λⲁⲛτερⲛιξ^[talk] 22:48, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Besides the obvious reason of trying to annoy me, I do not know why you are getting involved in disputes that I am. If the actual reason is that you are trying to annoy me, kindly stop doing so. That is unless you do not have a problem with me hounding your contributions to unrelated topics to annoy you. nableezy - 19:11, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nableezy, what kind of message that is? In case you did not notice I nave many different interests on Wikipedia, I mean I am not a single purpose account as you, Nableezy, are. I am not trying to annoy you, and I'm not hounding your contributions. I found the thing about Egypt from your own post on AN/I, and got interested in the subject. If you have something useful to add to this matter, please do, otherwise with your permission I will continue watch Egypt. Two massacres of Egyptian Christians by radical Islamist (Nag Hammadi massacre and Kosheh Martyrs) should be discussed in Egypt. Also, if you do mind, may I please ask you to use the talk page of the article to rise your concerns versus intimidating me on my own talk page. Please have a nice day.--Mbz1 (talk) 19:26, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again!

Nableezy is not happy with the inclusion of the section on Coptic persecution in the article Egypt. First he removed the entire section under the pretext that it was restored by a sockpuppet (while in fact it was written by established users including myself). When I restored the section with its references, he is now putting in question pretty much all the references. Now he reverted it again for the second time, removing the entire section with all the references. Any advice on how you would handle something like this?

Thanks again for your help. --λⲁⲛτερⲛιξ^[talk] 20:34, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please give me some time to work on this and try to find the references. Nableezy is blaming me that I neither know the topic nor interested in it, but I am interested very much.I will let you know, but please let's discuss it, versus edit warring. Best.--Mbz1 (talk) 20:38, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, thank you very much for your help. PS: you may find some help with sources and references here. --λⲁⲛτερⲛιξ^[talk] 20:43, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The sources are not the problem, there are plenty. The problem is how to make Nab to agree that at least few sentences section should be included in Egypt.--Mbz1 (talk) 21:16, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Last night I read a very interesting article in "Christianity's Modern-Day Martyrs: Victims of Radical Islam". On page 4 there is information about Copts in Egypt. This is a very reliable source. Some horrific stories in there. In Malaysia radical Islamists murder Christians only because they use the word Allah to address their Christian God, and in Egypt "the religion minister defended the legality of the death penalty for converts!" It is really hard to believe that we are talking about 21st century!--Mbz1 (talk) 23:34, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Very true. Thanks for the source, it's actually very helpful! --λⲁⲛτερⲛιξ^[talk] 01:26, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]