Talk:Here We Are Juggernaut: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
Nineinchsin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
:That would still be original research. This is why such analysis and description of videos should really be avoided. [[User:Rehevkor|Rehevkor]] <big>[[User talk:Rehevkor|<FONT COLOR="black">✉</FONT>]]</big> 19:08, 20 May 2010 (UTC) |
:That would still be original research. This is why such analysis and description of videos should really be avoided. [[User:Rehevkor|Rehevkor]] <big>[[User talk:Rehevkor|<FONT COLOR="black">✉</FONT>]]</big> 19:08, 20 May 2010 (UTC) |
||
Even though there's a picture of the Keywork on the front of the Coheed page? By your reasoning, the whole description should be taken down.[[User:Nineinchsin|Nineinchsin]] ([[User talk:Nineinchsin|talk]]) 02:30, 21 May 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 02:30, 21 May 2010
Songs Stub‑class | ||||||||||
|
Seriously, do the last two sentences need other references than the actual video which is already linked on the page? If so, then why do the other sentences and details not need references? Nineinchsin (talk) 01:47, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
- I left a message on your talk page. Rehevkor ✉ 02:16, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
Okay, the Starland one makes more sense now. How would you suggest I cite the Keywork. It's at the end of the video, so I would think a separate link to an image of the keywork may suffice.Nineinchsin (talk) 19:06, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
- That would still be original research. This is why such analysis and description of videos should really be avoided. Rehevkor ✉ 19:08, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
Even though there's a picture of the Keywork on the front of the Coheed page? By your reasoning, the whole description should be taken down.Nineinchsin (talk) 02:30, 21 May 2010 (UTC)