Jump to content

Fathers' rights movement: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
ClueBot (talk | contribs)
1,596,818 edits
m Reverting possible vandalism by Anonymum to version by WLU. False positive? Report it. Thanks, ClueBot. (750158) (Bot)
Anonymum (talk | contribs)
10 edits
Tag: section blanking
Line 8: Line 8:


The movement has received international press coverage as a result of high profile activism of their members,<ref name =Collier2006/><ref name =collier/> has become increasingly vocal, visible and organised, and has played a powerful role in family law debates.<ref name =Collier2006/>
The movement has received international press coverage as a result of high profile activism of their members,<ref name =Collier2006/><ref name =collier/> has become increasingly vocal, visible and organised, and has played a powerful role in family law debates.<ref name =Collier2006/>

==Demographics==
The fathers' rights movement exists almost exclusively in [[Industrialisation|industrialized countries]], where [[divorce]] has become more common.<ref name=Farrell2001>{{cite book | last = Farrell | first = W| authorlink = Warren Farrell | title = Father and Child Reunion | pages = Chap. 1–2 | publisher = [[G. P. Putnam's Sons]] | date = 2001 | isbn = 978-1585420759}}</ref> It emerged in the [[Western culture|West]] from the 1960s onwards as part of the [[men's movement]] with organizations such as [[Families Need Fathers]] originating in the 1970s.<ref name="gavanas">{{cite book | last = Gavanas | first = A | title = Men and Masculinities | editor = Kimmel MS; Aronson A | publisher = [[ABC-CLIO]] |year = 2004 | pages = [http://books.google.ca/books?id=jWj5OBvTh1IC&pg=PA289 289–91] | isbn = 1576077748 | url = }}</ref><ref name =fralr3>[[#FRALR|Collier & Sheldon]], 2006 p. 53-78</ref> In the late twentieth-century, the growth of the internet permitted wider discussion, publicity and activism about issues of interest to fathers' rights activists.<ref name="Lee">{{ cite book | last = Lee | first = CN |editor= Carroll BE | title = American Masculinities : A Historical Encyclopedia | publisher = [[SAGE Publications]] | chapter= Fathers' rights| date=2003|pages= [http://books.google.ca/books?id=E0R9lLtv8i8C&pg=PA166 166–68] | isbn = 9780761925408 |url=}}</ref> Factors thought to contribute to the development of the fathers' rights movement include shifting household [[demographic]]s brought about by rising divorce and falling marriage rates, changes in the understanding and expectations of fatherhood, motherhood and childhood and shifts in how legal systems impact families.<ref name =Collier2006/><ref name =collier>{{cite news | last =Collier | first =R | coauthors =Sheldon S| title =Unfamiliar territory: The issue of a father's rights and responsibilities covers more than just the media-highlighted subject of access to his children |publisher= [[The Guardian]] | date =2006-11-01 | url = http://society.guardian.co.uk/children/story/0,,1935970,00.html |accessdate=2007-10-17 }}</ref><ref name ="Changing Families">{{cite book | last = Ganong | first = L | coauthors = Coleman M | title = Changing Families, Changing Responsibilities: Family Obligations Following Divorce and Remarriage | year = 1999 | publisher = [[Taylor and Francis|Lawrence Erlbaum Associates]] | isbn=0805826912 | pages = [http://books.google.com/books?id=9Zk9ti2FS4oC&pg=PA48 48] }}</ref>

Fathers' rights groups in the West are primarily composed of white, [[Middle class|middle]] or [[working class]], heterosexual men.<ref>{{cite book | last = Crowley | first = JE | title = Families and social policy: national and international perspectives | editor = Haas L; Wisensale SL | publisher = [[Haworth Press]] | year = 2006 | chapter=Organization Responses to the Fatherhood Crisis: the Case of Fathers' Rights Group | isbn = 9780789032409 | pages = [http://books.google.ca/books?id=AGaQ6pMWO58C&pg=PA107 107-8]}}</ref><ref>{{cite book | last = Messner | first = MA | title = Politics of Masculinities: Men in Movements | publisher = [[Rowman & Littlefield]] | year = 1997 | pages = [http://books.google.ca/books?id=nG8MGcopgWQC&pg=PA47 47] | isbn = 9780803955776 | url = }}</ref><ref name="bertoia">{{cite journal | last = Bertoia | first = C | coauthors=Drakich J | year = 1993 | title = The Fathers' Rights Movement: Contradictions in Rhetoric and Practice | journal = Journal of Family Issues | publisher = | volume = 14 | pages = 592-615 | url = http://jfi.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/14/4/592}}</ref><ref name="gavanas" /> Members tend to be politically conservative<ref name=Parke1999/><ref name="crowley">{{cite book | last = Crowley | first = JE | title = Defiant Dads: Fathers' Rights Activists in America | publisher = [[Cornell University#Press|Cornell University Press]] | year = 2008 | pages = 43-46 | isbn = 978-0801446900}}</ref> but do not share a single set of political or social views<ref name=Parke1999 /> and are highly diverse in their goals and methods.<ref name =fralr3/><ref>[[#Parke1999|Parke & Brott]], 1999 p. [http://books.google.ca/books?id=uKN8gCzWFscC&pg=PA148 148]</ref> The movement advocates for strong relationships with their children,<ref name=Parke1999 /> and a focus on a narrowly defined set of issues based on the concerns of divorced or divorcing men.<ref name =fralr3/> Women, often the second wives of divorced fathers or other family members of men who have had some engagement with [[family law]] are also members of the fathers' rights movement, making up approximately 15 per cent of the membership,<ref name="bertoia"/><ref name="crowley"/> a fact that the groups take pains to emphasize.<ref name=kaye>{{cite journal | last =Kaye | first =M | coauthors =Tolmie J | title =Fathers' Rights Groups in Australia and their Engagement with Issues in Family Law | journal =Australian Journal of Family Law | volume =12 | pages = 19–68 | year =1998 | url =http://sisyphe.org/IMG/doc/doc-656.doc |accessdate=2007-03-24 |format=DOC}}</ref><ref>[[#FRALR|Collier & Sheldon]], 2006</ref> In Australia, groups tend to form and dissolve quickly, with long-term membership the result of the activities of a small number of dedicated individuals.<ref name = kaye/> Groups have been short-lived and unstable, as many members and leaders do not remain with the group after they have been helped.<ref name =Collier2006/> In 2005, disputes within [[Fathers 4 Justice]] occurred, with two of the best-known figures accused of defrauding an individual out of ₤500, while the accused men claimed they were ejected for questioning the organization's finances.<ref>{{cite news | url = http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article531077.ece | title = Fathers 4 Justice split by infighting | publisher = [[The Times|Times Online]] | last = Coates | first = S | date = 2005-06-08 | accessdate = 2008-09-03}}</ref>

===Political and social views===
The fathers' rights movement has both liberal and conservative branches, with different viewpoints about how men and women compare. Though both groups agree on the victimization and discrimination against men, they disagree on why men and women differ ([[nature versus nurture]]) and traditional [[gender role]]s. The liberal version believes differences between the sexes are due to culture, and support equality between men and women; in contrast the conservative branch believes in traditional [[patriarchy|patriarchal]] families and that the differences between genders are due to biology.<ref name="williams2">{{cite book | last = Williams | first =GI | title = Historical and Multicultural Encyclopedia of Women's Reproductive Rights in the United States | publisher = [[Greenwood Press]] | date = 2002 | pages = [http://books.google.ca/books?id=ZKVzULJ-764C&pg=PA81 81–83] | chapter = Fathers' Rights Movement|isbn=978-0313306440|url=}}</ref><ref name="gavanas04"/><ref name=Flood2004/><ref name="williams">{{cite book | last = Williams | first = GI | coauthors = Williams RH | title = Social Problems: Constructionist Readings | editor = Loseke DR & Best J | publisher = Aldine Transaction | year = 2003 | pages = [http://books.google.ca/books?id=BXIspcMwljIC&pg=PA93 93–100] | chapter = Framing in the Fathers' Rights Movement | isbn = 9780202307039 | url=}}</ref> Ross Parke and Armin Brott view the fathers' rights movement as one of three strands within the [[men's movement]] that deal almost exclusively with fatherhood, the other two being the good fathers' movement and groups forming the Christian Men's movement - the [[Promise Keepers]] being the largest.<ref name=Parke1999>[[#Parke1999|Parke]], 1999, p. [http://books.google.ca/books?id=uKN8gCzWFscC&pg=PA142 142]; [http://books.google.ca/books?id=uKN8gCzWFscC&pg=PA148 148-55].</ref>

The movement has been described as part of a gender war in response to increasing female power in Western society, and the consequent challenge to men's traditional roles and authority.<ref name =Collier2006/><ref name =collier/><ref name="Doyle">{{cite book | last = Doyle | first = C | title = Citizenship Revisited: Threats or Opportunities of Shifting Boundaries | editor = Herrmann P | publisher = Nova Science Pub Inc | date = 2004 | pages = [http://books.google.ca/books?id=HdLVGgJQ0mUC&pg=PA57 57–88] | chapter= The Fathers Rights Movement: Extending patriarchal control beyond the marital family |isbn=978-1590339008 | url = }}</ref> [[Warren Farrell]], a veteran of the womens', mens' and fathers' movement since the 1970s, describes the fathers' rights movement as part of a larger "gender transition movement", and thinks that similar to women in the 1960s, fathers are transitioning from gender-based to more flexible family roles. Farrell also believes the movement helps children by increasing the number who are raised equally by both parents, with social, academic, psychological and physical benefits - in his opinion it becomes a [[children's rights]] issue with fathers acting as advocates.<ref name=Farrell2001/>

Like other political advocacy groups, members of fathers' rights groups cast their personal troubles as pressing social problems,<ref name = Coltrane1992>{{cite journal | last1 = Coltrane | first1 = S | last2 = Hickman | first2 = N | title = The Rhetoric of Rights and Needs: Moral Discourse in the Reform of Child Custody and Child Support Laws | url = http://caliber.ucpress.net/doi/abs/10.1525/sp.1992.39.4.03x0046t | doi = 10.1525/sp.1992.39.4.03x0046t | journal = Social Problems | volume = 19 | issue = 4 | pages = 400–420 | year = 1992}}</ref><ref name = "Child Support Policy in Australia: Back to basics?">{{cite journal | last = Smyth | first = Bruce | title = Child support Policy in Australia: Back to basics? | journal = Family Matters | issue = 67 | publisher = Australian Institute of Family Studies | url = http://www.aifs.gov.au/institute/pubs/fm2004/fm67/bs3.pdf | accessdate = 2007-10-10 | format = PDF}}</ref> and that they use rhetorical strategies to elicit emotional responses.<ref name = Coltrane1992/> [[Michael Flood]] states that its members support shared parenting only as a symbolic issue related to "rights", "equality", and "fairness." He also states that its members are not actually interested in the shared care of their children or on the wishes of their children, and he adds that fathers’ rights groups have advocated policies and strategies which are harmful to mothers and children and also harmful to the fathers themselves.<ref name = "flood">{{cite conference | first = M | last = Flood | authorlink = | title = Separated Fathers and the Fathers’ Rights Movement | booktitle = Feminism, Law and the Family Workshop | publisher = Law School, University of Melbourne | date = | url = http://www.xyonline.net/downloads/Supportingseparatedfath.doc | accessdate = 2007-03-12 | format = DOC}}</ref> In contrast, social scientist Sanford Braver states that the bad divorced dad image is a seriously inaccurate myth that has led to harmful and dangerous social policies.<ref>[[#Baskerville2007|Baskerville]], 2007, p. 17.</ref>


==Beliefs and activities==
==Beliefs and activities==

Revision as of 01:58, 6 August 2009

Rights
Theoretical distinctions
Human rights
Rights by beneficiary
Other groups of rights

The fathers' rights movement is a movement whose members are primarily interested in issues related to family law, including child custody and child support that affect fathers and their children.[1][2] Many of its members are fathers who desire to share the parenting of their children equally with their children's mother - either after divorce or as unwed fathers. The movement includes women as well as men, often the second wives of divorced fathers or other family members of men who have had some engagement with family law.[3][1][4]

Most of the members of the fathers' rights movement had little prior interest in the law or politics. However, as they felt that their goal of equal shared parenting was being frustrated by the family courts, many took an interest in family law, including child custody and child support.[1][5][2]

Though it has been described as a social movement,[6][7] members of the movement believe their actions are better described as part of a civil rights movement.[5][8] Objections to the characterizations of the movement as a social movement are related to the belief that discrimination against fathers moves beyond the social sciences and originates in government intervention into family life.[9]

The movement has received international press coverage as a result of high profile activism of their members,[1][2] has become increasingly vocal, visible and organised, and has played a powerful role in family law debates.[1]

Beliefs and activities

Members of the fathers' rights movement assert that fathers are discriminated against as a result of gender bias in family law,[2][10][11][12] that custody decisions have been a denial of equal rights,[12][13] and that the influence of money has corrupted family law.[14] The movement's primary focus has been to campaign (including lobbying and research) for formal legal rights for fathers, and sometimes for children, and to campaign for changes to family law related to child custody, support and maintenance, domestic violence and the family court system itself.[1][15] Fathers’ rights groups also provide emotional and practical support for members during separation and divorce.[1][15]

Some fathers' rights groups have become frustrated with the slow pace of traditional campaigning for law reform.[10] Groups such as Fathers 4 Justice have become increasingly vocal and visible, undertaking public demonstrations which have attracted public attention and influenced the politics of family justice.[10] Some protests have proved controversial and have led to public disorder convictions for participants.[16][17]

The activities of some Fathers' rights groups have led to allegations of harassment and threatening behavior,[18][19] and in a conviction for stalking.[20][21] Fathers' rights activists have condemned violent behaviour,[15][22] with Matt O'Connor of Fathers 4 Justice asserting that his organisation was committed to "peaceful, non-violent direct action" and that members caught engaging in intimidation would be expelled.[19]

Main issues

Family court system

Main article: Family law

Members of the fathers' rights movement criticize the family court system. They define court-determined custody as not a right to parent one's children but as the power to prevent the other partner from parenting,[23] and they state that family courts are biased against fathers and shared custody.[24][25][26] They state that the outcome of divorce is overly one-sided, divorce is initiated by mothers in more than two-thirds of cases - especially when children are involved, and that divorce provides advantages for women, such as automatic custody of the children and financial benefits in the form of child support payments.[27] They also state that family courts are slow to help fathers enforce their parental rights,[28] expensive and time-consuming.[29]

Members of the fathers' rights movement including Stephen Baskerville, a former president of the American Coalition of Fathers and Children, state that family courts are secretive, censoring and punitive of fathers who criticize them,[23] and they also state that employees and activists within the courts support and benefit from the separation of children from their parents.[30][31] Baskerville further states that family law today represents civil rights abuses and intrusive perversion of government power.[32]

Others contest these conclusions, state that family courts are biased in favor of fathers[10][25] and also state that the lower percentage of separated fathers as custodial parents is a result of choices made by fathers rather than bias of family courts.[33]

Shared parenting

Main articles: Child custody, shared parenting, and best interests

Stating that "children need two parents" and that "children have a fundamental human right to an opportunity and relationship with both their mother and father", members of the fathers’ rights movement call for greater equality in parental responsibility following separation and divorce.[34][35] They call for laws creating a rebuttable presumption of 50/50 shared custody after divorce or separation, so that children would spend equal time with each parent unless there were reasons against it.[36] They point to studies showing that children in shared custody settings are better adjusted and have fewer social problems such as low academic achievement, crime, pregnancy, substance abuse, depression and suicide,[30] [37][38] and state that shared parenting is in fact in the best interests of the child.[39][40] Warren Farrell states that for children, equally shared parenting with three conditions: the child has about equal time with mom and dad, the parents live close enough to each other that the child does not need to forfeit friends or activities when visiting the other parent, and there is no bad-mouthing, is the second best family arrangement to the intact two-parent family, followed by primary father custody and then primary mother custody, and he adds that if shared parenting cannot be agreed upon, children on average are better off psychologically, socially, academically, and physically, have higher levels of empathy and assertiveness, and lower levels of ADHD, if their father is their primary custodial parent rather than their mother.[41]

Members of the fathers' rights movement and their critics disagree about the correlation of negative developmental outcomes for children to sole custody situations. Social scientist V. C. McLoyd states that father absence covaries with other relevant family characteristics such as the lack of an income from a male adult, the absence of a second adult, and the lack of support from a second extended family system and conclude that it is the negative effects of poverty, and not the absence of a father, that result in negative developmental outcomes.[42] On the other hand, members of the fathers' rights movement state that although the consequences of poverty and having a single parent are interrelated, each is a risk factor with independent effects on children,[43] and that the negative outcomes for children in sole custody situations correlate more strongly to "fatherlessness" than to any other variable including poverty.[44][45]

Members of the fathers' rights movement criticize the best interests of the child standard currently used in many countries for making custody decisions, which they describe as highly subjective and based on the personal prejudices of family court judges and court-appointed child custody evaluators,[39][40][46][47] and that courts are abusive when more than half custody is taken away from a willing, competent parent.[48] Members of the fathers' rights movement including Ned Holstein state that a rebuttable presumption of shared parenting is supported by a majority of citizens,[49] and Baskerville states that proposals to enact such laws are opposed by divorce lawyers and by feminist organizations, the latter by invoking the specter of domestic violence and child abuse as propaganda directed against fathers and fathers' rights groups.[50]

Mo Yee Lee states that joint custody arrangements are good for children only if there is no conflict between the parents.[51] Feminist groups state that if shared parenting were ordered, fathers would not provide their share of the daily care for the children.[33] The National Organization of Women and the American Bar Association also question the motives of those promoting shared parenting, noting that it would result in substantial decreases in or termination of child support payments.[52][53]

Stephen Baskerville states that shared parenting has been demonstrated to reduce parental conflict by requiring parents to cooperate and compromise, and that it is the lack of constraint by one parent resulting from the ability of that parent to exclude the other, that results in increased parental conflict.[54] He further states that only when child support guidelines exceed true costs do parents ask for or seek to prevent changes in parenting time for financial reasons, adding that any argument that a parent is asking for increased parenting time to reduce child support is at the same time an argument that the other parent is making a profit from child support.[55]

Critics state that some fathers' rights groups are more interested in enabling men to re-establish authority over their children and ex-partners and that issues of power and control in cases of domestic violence and child abuse are ignored.[56] Stephen Baskerville states that fathers have a constitutional right to shared control of their children and through political action they intend to establish parental authority for the well-being of their children.[57] Members of the fathers' rights movement state that a rebuttable presumption for shared parenting preserves a child's protection against unfit or violent parents.[58]

Child support

See also: Child support and paternity fraud

Members of the fathers’ rights movement campaign for the reform of child support guidelines, which in most Western countries are based on maintaining the children's standard of living after separation, and on the assumption that the children live with one parent and never with the other.[59][60] Activists state that the current guidelines are arbitrary, provide mothers with financial incentives to divorce, and leave fathers with little discretionary income to enjoy with the children during their parenting time.[27][59][61] In the US, fathers’ rights activists propose guidelines based on a Cost Shares model, in which child support would be based on the average income of the parents and the estimated child costs incurred by both parents.[4] Laura W. Morgan has stated that it focuses on the relative living standards of divorcing parents rather than the best interests of the children and financially supporting them at the same level after divorce.[62]

Solangel Maldonado states that the law should value a broader definition of fathering for poor fathers by reducing the focus on collecting child support and encouraging the informal contributions (such as groceries, clothes, toys, time with the children) of these fathers, by counting these contributions as child support.[63]

Members of the fathers’ rights movement state that child support should be terminated under certain conditions, such as if the custodial parent limits access to the children by moving away against the wishes of the other parent, gives fraudulent testimony, or if paternity fraud is discovered,[60] adding that two men should not have to pay child support for the same child.[59]

Stephen Baskerville states that it is often difficult for fathers in financial hardship or who take on a larger caregiving role with their children to have their child support payments lowered. He also states that unemployment is the primary cause of child support arrears, and further states that these arrearages make the father subject to arrest and imprisonment without due process.[45]

Stephen Baskerville states that the purpose of child support should be publicly determined, and enforcement programs must be designed to serve that purpose, observing the due process of law.[64]

Domestic violence

Main articles: Domestic violence and child abuse

Supporters of the fathers' rights movement assert that some women make false claims of domestic violence, sexual or child abuse in order to gain an upper hand in divorce, custody disputes and/or prevent fathers from seeing their children, and they state that lawyers advise women to make such claims.[65][46] They state that false claims of domestic violence and child abuse are encouraged by the inflammatory "win or lose" nature of child custody hearings, that men are presumed to be guilty rather than innocent by police and by the courts,[31][60][66] and that false allegations hurt the real victims of domestic violence.[67] They oppose the use of certain definitions of violence in child custody hearings that are based on fear, harassment and/or stalking, viewing them as vaguely defined and difficult to refute.[67] Lawyers and advocates for abused women assert that family court proceedings are not uncommonly accompanied with allegations of domestic violence because of the prevalence of domestic violence in society rather than as a result of false allegations of domestic violence. They also assert that domestic violence often begins or increases around the time of divorce or separation.[36]

Stephen Baskerville states that the paternal risk of child abuse is minimal.[31] He adds that when child abuse occurs, the perpetrator is not likely to be the father, and that the child abuse most often occurs after the father has been separated from his children.[27][31] He states that government policies are creating child abuse by separating children from their fathers.[31]

Supporters of the fathers’ rights movement point to domestic violence studies based on the Conflict Tactics Scale, which suggest that men and women act violently toward their partners in about equal percentages.[66][68][69] Members of the fathers' rights movement including Michael McCormick and Glenn Sacks state that men comprise a "significant minority" of the victims of domestic violence,[70] and other supporters call for more services to be provided for male victims of domestic violence.[69] Critics of the CTS dispute its reliability.[71][72][73] Michael Flood states that the CTS definitions of domestic violence obscure "variations in the meaning, consequences, and context of violent behaviors in families and relationships."[72]

Stephen Baskerville proposes that domestic violence and child abuse must be adjudicated as criminal assault, observing due process protections, and that government funding for programs addressing these issues must be made contingent on such protections.[64]

Parenting time interference

Glenn Sacks states that some mothers interfere with the father's parenting time and that such interference should be stopped.[74] Sacks and Jeffrey Leving state that parenting time interference can result from the custodial parent's relocation beyond a practical distance from the noncustodial parent and they campaign for a rebuttable presumption prohibiting such relocations.[75]

No-fault divorce

Main article: No-fault divorce

Stephen Baskerville states that laws establishing no-fault divorce did not stop at removing the requirement that grounds be cited for a divorce, so as to allow for divorce by "mutual consent"; it also allows either spouse to end the marriage without any agreement or fault by the other.[76] Phyllis Schlafly states that no-fault divorce should be referred to as unilateral divorce.[77]

Stephen Baskerville states that laws establishing no-fault divorce can be seen as one of the boldest social experiments in modern history that have effectively ended marriage as a legal contract.[78] He states that it is not possible to form a binding agreement to create a family, adding that government officials can, at the request of one spouse, end a marriage over the objection of the other.[78] He states that no-fault divorce has left fathers with no protection against what they describe as the confiscation of their children.[79]

Baskerville states that fault has entered through the back door in the form of child custody hearings, and that the forcibly divorced spouse ("defendant") is presumed guilty.[80] Similarly, other members of the fathers' rights movement believe that men fail to get appropriate recognition of their innocence as a result of no-fault divorce.[3] Baskerville describes a proposed amendment of no-fault divorce laws that would create a rebuttable presumption that custody of any minor children be awarded to the respondent [who is innocent or does not wish to divorce] regardless of gender. He also notes the predictions of Tim O'Brien, the author of the proposed amendment and a Libertarian, who states that the proposed amendment would result in a plummeting divorce rate and reduced negative consequences for children.[81]

Stephen Baskerville proposes "reasonable limits" on no-fault divorce when children are involved.[64] Some members of the FRM support the end of the no-fault principle in child custody and divorce decisions.[3][82][83] Some members of the fathers' rights movement state that the availability of divorce should also be limited.[3]

Government involvement

Stephen Baskerville states that governments throughout the United States and other democracies are engaged, by accident or design, in a campaign against fathers and fatherhood, which in his view, lies at the root of a larger problem that threatens marriage, destroys families, devastates the lives of many children, and undermines parents, democracy and accountability.[84] Baskerville also states that it is the removal of the father from the family through divorce that initiates problems for which the government is perceived as the solution rather than the problem, and that these problems are then used to justify the continued existence and expansion of the government.[85] Members of the fathers' rights movement state that modern divorce involves government officials invading parents' private lives, evicting people from their homes, seizing their property, and taking away their children.[86][87]

Unwarranted termination of parental rights

Main article: Parents' rights movement

Parents' rights advocates state that many parents' parental rights are unnecessarily terminated, and that children are separated from fathers and mothers and adopted through the actions of family courts and government social service agencies seeking to meet their own targets, rather than looking at the merits of each case.[88]

Members of the fathers' rights movement state that government employees harm children by disregarding the loving bonds they share with their fathers, when social workers place children in the foster care system without informing their fathers.[89]

Terminology

Fathers' and parents' rights campaigners state that parenting time should be used to replace contact, visitation and residence. The term visitation is particularly objectionable to fathers' rights activists, who believe that this term reinforces the idea that only one parent raises the children. It is perceived that there is a stigma associated with treating one parent as resident and the other as non-resident.

Phyllis Schlafly states that child support should be referred to as parental transfer payments.[77]

Notable supporters

Public supporters of the fathers' rights movement and their issues, include divorced (and subsequently widowed) Live Aid founder, Bob Geldof,[90] Irish writer and journalist John Waters and Karen DeCrow, former president of the National Organization for Women.[91][92]

Significant writers

See also

Footnotes

  1. ^ a b c d e f g Collier & Sheldon, 2006, p. 1-26.
  2. ^ a b c d Collier, R (2006-11-01). "Unfamiliar territory: The issue of a father's rights and responsibilities covers more than just the media-highlighted subject of access to his children". The Guardian. Retrieved 2007-10-17. {{cite news}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help) Cite error: The named reference "collier" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
  3. ^ a b c d Cite error: The named reference kaye was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  4. ^ a b Crowley, JE (2003). The Politics of Child Support in America. Cambridge University Press. pp. 189–90. ISBN 9780521535113.
  5. ^ a b Sacks, G (2006-06-21). "Why Are There so Many Women in the Fathers' Movement?". Star Tribune. {{cite news}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  6. ^ McKee, A (2005). The Public Sphere: an introduction. University of Queensland. pp. 47. ISBN 9780521549905.
  7. ^ Kenedy, R (2004). Fathers For Justice: The Rise Of A New Social Movement In Canada As A Case Study Of Collective Identity Formation. Caravan Books. ISBN 978-0882061085.
  8. ^ Baskerville, 2007, p. 259.
  9. ^ Baskerville, 2007, p. 282.
  10. ^ a b c d Cite error: The named reference fralr3 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  11. ^ Gavanas, A (2004). Fatherhood Politics in the United States. University of Illinois Press. pp. 10-11. ISBN 9780252028847.
  12. ^ a b Cite error: The named reference williams was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  13. ^ Ashe, F (2007). The New Politics of Masculinity. Routledge. pp. 58–68. ISBN 978-0-415-30275-3.
  14. ^ Baskerville, 2007, p. 42.
  15. ^ a b c Flood, M (2004). "Angry Men's Movements". In Rossi SE (ed.). The Battle and Backlash Rage On. Xlibris Corporation. {{cite book}}: |access-date= requires |url= (help); |format= requires |url= (help); Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help); External link in |chapterurl= (help); Unknown parameter |chapterurl= ignored (|chapter-url= suggested) (help)
  16. ^ Sheaves, B (2004-11-25). "Fathers 4 Terror". Daily Mail. {{cite news}}: |access-date= requires |url= (help)
  17. ^ "Fathers 4 Justice four are guilty". BBC News. 2004-10-21. Retrieved 2008-11-04.
  18. ^ Bolton, MM (2006-04-21). "Custody bill fight turns frightful". Times-Union. Retrieved 2008-11-04.
  19. ^ a b Elliott, J (2004-11-21). "Fathers 'terrorise' lawyers: Campaigners accused of threats". The Sunday Times. Retrieved 2008-11-04. {{cite news}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  20. ^ "Blackshirts want Family Court axed". Australian Associated Press. 14 December 2004. Retrieved 2008-11-05.
  21. ^ Cauldfield, Christine (2004-09-30). "Stalker: lesson learned". Herald-Sun. {{cite news}}: |access-date= requires |url= (help)
  22. ^ Gilchrist, Jim (2003-05-29). "The outlaw fathers fighting back". The Scotsman. {{cite news}}: |access-date= requires |url= (help)
  23. ^ a b Baskerville, 2007.
  24. ^ "Select Committee on Constitutional Affairs Fourth Report". House of Commons, Parliament UK. 2005-02-23. Retrieved 2007-03-18.
  25. ^ a b Charalambous, M (2005-07-10). "New research shows bias in restraining orders". The Fatherhood Coalition. Retrieved 2007-04-14.
  26. ^ "The Operation of the Family Courts" (pdf). House of Commons Constitutional Affairs Committee Family Justice. 2004-11-08. Retrieved 2007-03-18.
  27. ^ a b c Baskerville, S (2003). "Divorce as Revolution". Salisbury Review. 21 (4). Retrieved 2008-11-10.
  28. ^ Sacks, G (2004-05-25). "National Fatherhood Initiative's Ad Campaign Insults African-American Fathers". Daily Breeze. Retrieved 2007-03-14. {{cite news}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  29. ^ Baskerville, S (2004). The Fatherhood Crisis: Time for a New Look (PDF). National Center for Policy Analysis. ISBN 1-56808-136-7. Retrieved 2007-03-18.
  30. ^ a b Baskerville, S (2002). "The Politics of Fatherhood". Political Science and Politics. 35 (4). Retrieved 2007-03-15.
  31. ^ a b c d e Baskerville, S (2006). "Family Violence in America The Truth About Domestic Violence and Child Abuse" (PDF). Retrieved 2007-03-14. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  32. ^ Baskerville, 2007, p. 24.
  33. ^ a b Baker, Maureen (2001). Families, labour and love: [family diversity in a changing world]. Vancouver: UBC Press. pp. 198–9. ISBN 0-7748-0848-9.
  34. ^ Parkin, K (1974-06-12). "Fathers need their families". The Guardian. Retrieved 2008-11-04.
  35. ^ "Shared Parenting Council". Shared Parenting Council. Retrieved 2008-11-04.
  36. ^ a b Ottaman, Ana (2008). "Fathers' rights movement". In Edleson, Jeffrey L., Renzetti, Claire M. (ed.). Encyclopedia of Interpersonal Violence. SAGE Publications. pp. 252. ISBN 978-1412918008. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: editors list (link)
  37. ^ "Shared Parenting: Common Objections versus the Facts" (PDF). The Liberator. 32 (3). American Coalition of Fathers and Children. 2005. Retrieved 2007-03-15.
  38. ^ McCormick M. "HB 5267 Will Help Michigan's Children of Divorce". American Coalition of Fathers and Children. Retrieved 2007-03-15. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  39. ^ a b "New York Times Press Gives Major Press Coverage for Fathers". Fathers & Families. 2005-05-08. Retrieved 2007-05-27.
  40. ^ a b Schlafly, P (2007-07-23). "Children's rights should include life with both parents". Retrieved 2007-09-30.
  41. ^ Cite error: The named reference Farrell2001 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  42. ^ McLoyd VC (1998). "Socioeconomic disadvantage and child development". Am Psychol. 53 (2): 185–204. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.53.2.185. PMID 9491747. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  43. ^ Hart, CH (1999). "Combating the Myth that Parents Don't Matter". The Howard Center for Family Religion and Society. Retrieved 2007-03-28.
  44. ^ "Deconstructing the Essential Father". SPARC. Retrieved 2007-09-22.
  45. ^ a b Baskerville, S (2004). "Is There Really A Fatherhood Crisis?". The Independent Institute. Retrieved 2007-05-01.
  46. ^ a b Schlafly, P (2005-02-02). "The Fatherphobia of Family Courts". Retrieved 2007-04-24.
  47. ^ Newdow, M (2004-06-18). "Family Feud". Slate. Retrieved 2007-04-30.
  48. ^ "An Appeal to the Parents of America about the Destruction of the American Family" (pdf). American Coalition of Fathers and Children. Retrieved 2007-03-15.
  49. ^ "Testimony in Support of an Act Relative to Shared Parenting" (PDF). Fathers & Families. 2003-09-25. Retrieved 2007-10-14.
  50. ^ Baskerville, 2007, p.21.
  51. ^ Yee, MY (2002). "A Model of Children's Postdivorce Behavioral Adjustment in Maternal- and Dual-Residence Arrangements". Journal of Family Issues. 23 (5): 672–697. doi:10.1177/0192513X02023005005.; lay-summary
  52. ^ American Bar Association (2000), Guide to Family Law: Effect of Joint Custody, retrieved 2007-03-15
  53. ^ "Fathers' Responsibilities Before Fathers' Rights". NOW-NYS. 2006-07-29. Retrieved 2007-09-09. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  54. ^ Baskerville, 2007, p. 305.
  55. ^ Baskerville, 2007, p. 249.
  56. ^ Callander, Debbi. "On Abuse, Shared Parenting, & the System". Retrieved 2007-03-24. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  57. ^ "Fathers' Rights Are Fathers' Duties". FatherMag.Com. 1998–2000. Retrieved 2007-10-14.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: date format (link)
  58. ^ "Position Paper of Fathers & Families" (PDF). Fathers & Families. 2007. Retrieved 2007-10-06.
  59. ^ a b c "Comments on the Child Support Guidelines". F.A.C.T. Fathers Are Capable Too: Parenting Association. Retrieved 2007-04-12.
  60. ^ a b c "Recommendations for Child Support Guideline Revisement June, 2001". 2001. Retrieved 2007-04-15. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  61. ^ Wilson, KC (2004-09-15). "The Subversion of Child Support". IFeminists.Com. Retrieved 2007-03-17.
  62. ^ Morgan, LW (2005-02-15). "The "Cost Share" model of child support guidelines". Retrieved 2007-03-24.
  63. ^ Maldonado, S (2006). "Deadbeat or Deadbroke: Redefining Child Support for Poor Fathers" (PDF). Retrieved 2007-06-21.
  64. ^ a b c Baskerville, 2007, p. 298.
  65. ^ Cite error: The named reference gavanas was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  66. ^ a b "Controlling Domestic Violence Against Men". Equal Justice Foundation. 2002. Retrieved 2007-10-04. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  67. ^ a b "An Epidemic of Civil Rights Abuses: Ranking of States' Domestic Violence Laws" (PDF). Respecting accuracy in domestic abuse reporting. 2006. Retrieved 2007-05-05. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  68. ^ "Claims about Husband Battering". American Coalition of Fathers and Children. August 1999. Retrieved 2007-09-21. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  69. ^ a b "October's Domestic Violence Awareness Month Ignores Many Victims". American Coalition of Fathers and Children. 2006. Retrieved 2007-03-15. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help); Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  70. ^ "Equal Rights Amendment Yes, 'Women's Equality Amendment' No". GlennSacks.Com. 2006. Retrieved 2007-04-15. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help); Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  71. ^ Taft, A (2001). "Are men and women equally violent to intimate partners?". Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health. 25 (6): 498–500. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  72. ^ a b Flood, Michael (2006-02-23/24). The Debate Over Men’s Versus Women’s Family Violence. Australian Institute of Judicial Administration Family Violence Conference. Adelaide. {{cite conference}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  73. ^ Archer, J (1999). "Assessment of the reliability of the Conflict Tactics Scale: A meta-analytic review". Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 14 (12): 1263–1289.
  74. ^ "Equal Parents Week Highlights Need for Family Court Reform". GlennSacks.Com. 2002-09-26. Retrieved 2007-03-15. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  75. ^ "AB 400 Will Help Wisconsin's Children of Divorce". glennsacks.com. 2005-06-17. Retrieved 2007-05-12. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |coauthers= ignored (help)
  76. ^ Baskerville, 2007, p. 45.
  77. ^ a b Schlafly, P (2006). "Phyllis Schlafly's keynote address" (wmv). American Coalition of Fathers and Children. Retrieved 2007-05-12.
  78. ^ a b Baskerville, 2007, p. 46.
  79. ^ Baskerville, 2007, p.44.
  80. ^ Baskerville, 2007, p. 76-77.
  81. ^ Baskerville, 2007, p. 306.
  82. ^ Khader, Serene J. (October–December 2008). "When Equality Justifies Women's Subjection: Luce Irigaray's Critique of Equality and the Fathers' Rights Movement". Hypatia:A Journal of Feminist Philosophy. 23 (4). Indiana University Press: pp. 48–74. doi:10.2979/HYP.2008.23.4.48. {{cite journal}}: |pages= has extra text (help)
  83. ^ "Restoring Control over matrimonial and family law". September 2004. Retrieved 2008-12-07. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  84. ^ Baskerville, 2007, pp. 18, 268, 287.
  85. ^ Baskerville, 2007, p. 287.
  86. ^ Baskerville, 2007, p. 20.
  87. ^ Gavanas, A (2002). "The Fatherhood Responsibility Movement: the centrality of marriage, work and male sexuality in reconstructions of masculinity and fatherhood". In Hobson B (ed.). Making Men Into Fathers: Men, Masculinities and the Social Politics of Fatherhood. Cambridge University Press. pp. 220. ISBN 0511029527.
  88. ^ "Unwarranted Adoptions". BBC. Retrieved 2007-06-05.
  89. ^ Leving, JM (2007-07-11). "Choosing foster parents over fathers". The San Diego Union-Tribune. Retrieved 2007-10-05. {{cite news}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  90. ^ "Bob Geldof". Shared Parenting Information Group (SPIG) UK. Retrieved 2007-05-01.
  91. ^ "Welcome to California Shared Parenting Alliance". California Shared Parenting Alliance. Retrieved 2007-03-18.
  92. ^ Fittro, T. "Family law reform helps children". Sunday Gazette Mail. Retrieved 2007-03-18. {{cite news}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)

References

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fathers%27_rights_movement&oldid=306321561"