Wikipedia:Editor review/Willking1979: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
# |
# |
||
# Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future? |
# Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future? |
||
#: Removed edits relating to Rooster Rock State Park in Oregon, referencing the original [[Chinook Wawa]] name as it referred to "penis" not "rooster". Cock rock eventually became known as rooster rock, but the origin is penis. He is engaging in cristian revision of Native American culture, because he feels it infringes on his Christianity. I am a native of Oregon and have been to that very park many times Looking at the rock after which it was named clearly indicated the origin of the name, it has nothing to do with a rooster. Revising Phallic history to feed your Christian beliefs is not the solution! |
|||
#: One dispute was over [[Teleology]]. While I originally thought that an editor was making bad-faith edits and was involved with sockpuppetry, it turned out to be the opposite. I learned a great deal from this experience. |
#: One dispute was over [[Teleology]]. While I originally thought that an editor was making bad-faith edits and was involved with sockpuppetry, it turned out to be the opposite. I learned a great deal from this experience. |
||
# In your general opinion, what do you feel are actions that warrant perma-banning? |
# In your general opinion, what do you feel are actions that warrant perma-banning? |
||
Revision as of 01:34, 25 January 2009
Willking1979 (talk · contribs) As Daniel Boone, Thomas Walker, and others blazed the trail through Cumberland Gap to settle my home state of Kentucky and eventually westward, Wikipedia is blazing new trails in the world of knowledge by providing free content to the entire world. It is an honor and a privilege to be a part of an enormous project. I appreciate your suggestions for making my experience on Wikipedia better. Willking1979 (talk) 21:03, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
Reviews
Comments
- View this user's edit count using Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool
Questions
- Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
- I am pleased with my experience fighting vandalism, erasing linkspam, and tagging articles for speedy deletion. I created the article on the June Buchanan School. While that article needs to be expanded (you can help!), I recently expanded Kentucky Baptist Convention. In addition, I have tagged several articles for the Christianity WikiProject and WikiProject Kentucky.
- Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
- One dispute was over Teleology. While I originally thought that an editor was making bad-faith edits and was involved with sockpuppetry, it turned out to be the opposite. I learned a great deal from this experience.
- In your general opinion, what do you feel are actions that warrant perma-banning?
- Obviously, a long-term pattern of abuse and/or incivility. Another action that could cause a permanent ban is long-term edit-warring.