User talk:Jayakrishnan.ks100: Difference between revisions

you have taken the right actions in restoring the correct values from the sources and giving notice to the IPs on their talk page about their inappropriate actions. You may want to be more careful about using the generic vandalism warnings - a whole listing of warnings are found here Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace

the template below talks about inserting factual errors and would probably be most appropriate, increasing the number with each time they repeat the act.

• {subst:uw-error1} / {subst:uw-error2} / {subst:uw-error3} / {subst:uw-error4}

When they have been given and ignored the "final warning", then they can be reported at the vandal notice board Wikipedia:AIV and an administrator will take action.-- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 07:49, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,, Jayakrishnan.ks100! The things mentioned above by User:TheRedPenOfDoom are spot-on. First try warning if the User/Ip is Vandalising, if still continues u may report at :Administrator intervention against vandalism page (mostly after final warning unless it is a blatant Vandalism). Happy editing! reagrds, DRAGON BOOSTER ★ 14:17, 21 February 2013 (UTC).[reply]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Peruva.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
• You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Hasteur (talk) 20:04, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There seems to be an edit war going on Malayalam cinema page. Which started with this edit made by 69.47.228.36. From what I understand, 69.47.228.36 edited an info existed in the Malayalam cinema page and South Indian film industry page for long time. It carried citations to newspapers links justifying it. 69.47.228.36 edited the information and citations too. He then proceeded to edit South Indian film industry also to suit his plans, all these without not a single independent report justifying claim. The edit war has to stop. Please restore the version existed before edit war started, until consensus is reached. ChroniclerSanjay (talk) 10:27, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting you to put your thoughts here: Talk:Malayalam_cinema#Page_protected.

Btw, very surprised to see a new user getting alligned so quickly with the wiki policies. I guess you were here for fairly sometime before migrating to this user name; were'nt you? Cheers, -- Aarem ^(Talk) 08:31, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It should be more or less cleaned up now. There are two outstanding films that need to be sourced (one has some information on the talk page that simple addition should be able to make if one is familiar with converting to US dollars) and then the list put into proper order.

I also left a question on the talk page about what income streams BOI uses to determine Gross that may be added into the lead if appropriate.

If there is information about various box office milestones, (first film to reach X, first film to break X in only overseas collection, etc.) those might be interesting to include as well. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 18:03, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mr. Kunjacko Boban has acted in 50 films in malayalam cinema as lead and supporting actor and is cosidered as one of the leading actors of malayalam cinema. his latest realse romans has been widely acclaimed for his performance. thank u. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nightocean (talk • contribs) 15:26, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You can't just vaguely say "considered". Considered by whom? You should provide the citation for that. Otherwise, it would fall under peacock terms. Same with term 'widely acclaimed'. Wikipedia follows the encyclopedic writing style. So you should rely of factual and provable statements about the subject. JK (talk) 15:54, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

there were several articles where materialthunder and nightocean were edit warring against each other, so if they are the same individual, they either have a split personality or are much more sophisticated in their Wiki-manipulations than they appear. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 07:56, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Another user has indicated a belief that the user is socking through a different account and an investigation has been opened at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Flowers of the world. If you wish to include your views about the other account, please go to the page at add your evidence and WP:DIFFS. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 17:59, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mr. Mammootty has acted in more than 360 films,in malayalam cinema as lead actor and is cosidered as one of the leading method actors of malayalam cinema. this is long standing sourced material you can check it. thanks. (talk) User:Flowers of the world (talk) d 01:23, 5 March 2013 (UTC) (UTC)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Flowers_of_the_world[reply]

Hello, Jayakrishnan.ks100. You have new messages at Rybec's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Peruva, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

—rybec 05:55, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Kunchacko Boban shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. You may be blocked from editing without further notice. Mollywood1 (talk) 10:55, 28 March 2013‎ (UTC)[reply]

I have opened a new chapter in the sock puppet investigation Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Flowers of the world on your behalf. Please provide the more specific evidence. Thanks! -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 12:29, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kunchacko Boban. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Why are you making unnecessary changes to Good Article. ---London at night ^{talk to me} 07:52, 30 March 2013‎ (UTC)

Stop misusing warning templates. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia not a fanpage. JK (talk) 08:17, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Who tells it is a fan page. This is not misusing. Merenjith (talk gave me a report that you removing the source from article Kunchacko Boban and you promoting dileep here «»[1]«» ---London at night ^{talk to me} 08:29, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]