Template:Did you know nominations/Accessibility of transport in London: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
source |
||
Line 56: | Line 56: | ||
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
||
:::::I think "only" should be removed, but other than that, it's fine. <code>[[User:TheNuggeteer|🍗TheNugg]][[User talk:TheNuggeteer|eteer🍗]]</code> 23:38, 8 July 2024 (UTC) |
:::::I think "only" should be removed, but other than that, it's fine. <code>[[User:TheNuggeteer|🍗TheNugg]][[User talk:TheNuggeteer|eteer🍗]]</code> 23:38, 8 July 2024 (UTC) |
||
::::::*Alt2: that a '''[[Accessibility of transport in London|third of London Underground stations have step free access]]'''? |
::::::*Alt2: that a '''[[Accessibility of transport in London|third of London Underground stations have step free access]]'''? |
||
:::::: All other issues with the article are now resolved (it has a more substantive lead, fixed words etc) [[User:Turini2|Turini2]] ([[User talk:Turini2|talk]]) 09:03, 9 July 2024 (UTC) |
:::::: All other issues with the article are now resolved (it has a more substantive lead, fixed words etc) [[User:Turini2|Turini2]] ([[User talk:Turini2|talk]]) 09:03, 9 July 2024 (UTC) |
Revision as of 09:06, 9 July 2024
DYK toolbox |
---|
Accessibility of transport in London
- ... that in 2006, London became one of the first major cities to have an fully accessible bus fleet?
- ALT1: ... that all London taxis have been accessible to wheelchair passengers since 2000? Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2004/04/18/travel/rolling-along-in-london.html
- Reviewed:
- Comment: Hi, this article has been a labour of love for 3 years and it's finally moved to mainspace! I offer a variety of hooks (positive and negative), happy for feedback on this - there's a fair few relevant photos too.
Moved to mainspace by Turini2 (talk).
Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.
Turini2 (talk) 12:44, 2 July 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: None required. |
Overall: Some problems need fixing. TheNuggeteer (talk) 02:29, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
- I've made changes and comments as required to the article. I think I'd like to focus on the positive hooks, with this photo instead? Turini2 (talk) 11:29, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
- I think I found a better hook.
- Alt2: that only a third of London Underground stations have step free access?
- I think I found a better hook.
- I think that is more interesting as since the TfL bus fleet has been accessible for a while. but since the LU is the oldest metro systems, its partially accessible with only a third. Also with taxis, I assume you're talking about the TfL ones since other services like Uber likely don't have the accessibility scheme in place and use a normal car. I also think something that is not mostly accessible is better and more interesting that those that are fully accessible. For example, a hook stating that the Elizabeth line is fully accessible (even including the old stations) wouldn't be interesting as new(er) systems are expected to be accessible/have step free systems. JuniperChill (talk) 09:36, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Sure, I'm happy to go with that hook with a minor tweak for "step-free"- yes, I mean "London black taxi", technically Uber is not a taxi (Vehicle for hire). I didn't want to be too negative about accessibility, but the Tube one is balanced. Could use the lead photo - unsure on caption though! Turini2 (talk) 10:51, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry for the late reply as I was out and about. Anyway, I don't really need to see the point of the photo if we are talking about 1/3rd of LU stations accessible since I cannot think what demonstrates it, plus its very tight for images on DYK because only one image a day (or two images a day in the event of a backlog) for the ~8 hooks. Also @TheNuggeteer:, what do you think of the new hook as you initially reviewed it? JuniperChill (talk) 16:23, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Sure, I'm happy to go with that hook with a minor tweak for "step-free"- yes, I mean "London black taxi", technically Uber is not a taxi (Vehicle for hire). I didn't want to be too negative about accessibility, but the Tube one is balanced. Could use the lead photo - unsure on caption though! Turini2 (talk) 10:51, 8 July 2024 (UTC)