Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Accessibility of transport in London: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
source
Line 56: Line 56:
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
:::::I think "only" should be removed, but other than that, it's fine. <code>[[User:TheNuggeteer|🍗TheNugg]][[User talk:TheNuggeteer|eteer🍗]]</code> 23:38, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
:::::I think "only" should be removed, but other than that, it's fine. <code>[[User:TheNuggeteer|🍗TheNugg]][[User talk:TheNuggeteer|eteer🍗]]</code> 23:38, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
::::::*Alt2: that a '''[[Accessibility of transport in London|third of London Underground stations have step free access]]'''?
::::::*Alt2: that a '''[[Accessibility of transport in London|third of London Underground stations have step free access]]'''?
:::::: All other issues with the article are now resolved (it has a more substantive lead, fixed words etc) [[User:Turini2|Turini2]] ([[User talk:Turini2|talk]]) 09:03, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
:::::: All other issues with the article are now resolved (it has a more substantive lead, fixed words etc) [[User:Turini2|Turini2]] ([[User talk:Turini2|talk]]) 09:03, 9 July 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 09:06, 9 July 2024

Accessibility of transport in London

London Taxi with wheelchair ramp
London Taxi with wheelchair ramp
Moved to mainspace by Turini2 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

Turini2 (talk) 12:44, 2 July 2024 (UTC).

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: None required.

Overall: Some problems need fixing. TheNuggeteer (talk) 02:29, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

I've made changes and comments as required to the article. I think I'd like to focus on the positive hooks, with this photo instead? Turini2 (talk) 11:29, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
London bus with wheelchair ramp
I think I found a better hook.
I think that is more interesting as since the TfL bus fleet has been accessible for a while. but since the LU is the oldest metro systems, its partially accessible with only a third. Also with taxis, I assume you're talking about the TfL ones since other services like Uber likely don't have the accessibility scheme in place and use a normal car. I also think something that is not mostly accessible is better and more interesting that those that are fully accessible. For example, a hook stating that the Elizabeth line is fully accessible (even including the old stations) wouldn't be interesting as new(er) systems are expected to be accessible/have step free systems. JuniperChill (talk) 09:36, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Sure, I'm happy to go with that hook with a minor tweak for "step-free"- yes, I mean "London black taxi", technically Uber is not a taxi (Vehicle for hire). I didn't want to be too negative about accessibility, but the Tube one is balanced. Could use the lead photo - unsure on caption though! Turini2 (talk) 10:51, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Sorry for the late reply as I was out and about. Anyway, I don't really need to see the point of the photo if we are talking about 1/3rd of LU stations accessible since I cannot think what demonstrates it, plus its very tight for images on DYK because only one image a day (or two images a day in the event of a backlog) for the ~8 hooks. Also @TheNuggeteer:, what do you think of the new hook as you initially reviewed it? JuniperChill (talk) 16:23, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
I think "only" should be removed, but other than that, it's fine. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 23:38, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
All other issues with the article are now resolved (it has a more substantive lead, fixed words etc) Turini2 (talk) 09:03, 9 July 2024 (UTC)