Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Final Fantasy IV: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Line 123:
***I'd agree that ''IV'' is on the higher end of the spectrum when it comes to having a story where almost everything presented is actually relevant, but I'd still argue that ''VII'' has one of the more complex stories. At least in terms of how it's presented. Which is ironic considering how much of the story isn't even relevant to that core complex plot arc. ''IV'' is definitely consistent in its developments bearing relevance. By the way, still haven't gotten time to review the whole article, I'm afraid, but I'm liking of what I've seen so far. [[User:Ryu Kaze|Ryu Kaze]] 23:28, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
****You're a good man, Ryu, and I really appreaciate all you've done for us. '''[[User:Crazyswordsman|<font color="orange">Sir Crazyswordsman</font>]]''' 23:44, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
*****Well, thank you for saying so, Sir CS. You guys are most welcome, and it's been my pleasure. I just wish I had more time to lend a helping hand these days. By the way, I've had more time to look over the article and now throw in
'''Support''' for the reasons others have mentioned (particularly Deckiller's vote of confidence) and the touch-ups that have been made since the FAC began. Good work. [[User:Ryu Kaze|Ryu Kaze]] 02:29, 20 September 2006 (UTC) | |||