Talk:U.S. Route 491: Difference between revisions

:I don't think they should be split. The two articles would be 100% redundant except for the history section where the dividing line would be 2003, not leaving much for history on the US 491 article. There is precedent for having articles on "historical" highways, however this is usually because no modern highway exactly follows the historical one. In this case, with the exception of the Arizona portion US 491 is a direct replacement for US 666. [[User:Moabdave|Dave]] ([[User talk:Moabdave|talk]]) 06:09, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

::I agree with Dave on this. Before May 31, 2003, this was US 666, and starting June 1, 2003, it is US 491; that is a one-to-one replacement. <span style="background:#006B54; padding:2px;" >'''[[User:Imzadi1979|<font color="white">Imzadi&nbsp;1979</font>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Imzadi1979|<font color="white"><big>→</big></font>]]'''</span> 06:30, 4 July 2011 (UTC)