Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard: Difference between revisions

*:::::::::And what I'm saying here is that a weak refutation should not be more heavily weighted than no refutation. If anything it should be weighted less, because it reveals a fundamentally weak argument. [[User:LokiTheLiar|Loki]] ([[User talk:LokiTheLiar|talk]]) 20:20, 10 July 2024 (UTC)

*::::::::::That’s absolutely absurd. Someone who is expressing their opinion with reasoning/rationale will always be weighted higher than someone who drives by and “throws a !vote at the house”. You claim it’s weak, then care to explain why a majority of “non drive by” editors after the refutation agreed with it? And of those who didn’t, very few bothered to actually explain what they found wrong with it? Those two things are, in fact, the sign of a strong refutation. -bɜ:ʳkənhɪmez ([[User:Berchanhimez|User]]/[[User talk:Berchanhimez|say hi!]]) 20:25, 10 July 2024 (UTC)

 

===Participants===