Commons:Deletion requests/Beautiful blurrs

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

1) Typo in title. 2) If this page is going to stay, it should be called "Blurs" or something similar, whether it is beautiful is in the eye of the beholder. 3) Should this perhaps be moved to userspace as three of the pics are by creator of page. 4) There might be a point to having perhaps a category of blurry pictures so the useless can be rooted out and the useful ones kept, it sitting under "photography" cat? Don't know if this discussion has been had. Opinions needed. Thanks. --Deadstar 09:03, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I created this page and I am not very experienced (yet). Concerning 1) I don't know what I did wrong here. Is there still a way to change the typo of the page-title? Concerning 2) I agree! Concerning 3) I am not sure. I think there is a potential that other users could contribute to this collection and that it helps users to find what they are lookig for. Can't we give it bit time and see whether this page will be used or not? Concerning 4) The idea of this page was actually to create a space for pictures that, in a general undestanding, have "mistakes". The sharpness of pictures is something that seems to be out of question for photography, but I think you loose many pictures if you are not aware of the quality some blurred pictures can have. Yes, it might be better to put it in the photography section, if I understood you correctly. Best wishes.--Christoph Michels 12:47, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Christoph - thanks for your reaction & firstly: you did nothing wrong. It is just a typo in the title and it can be changed. I am however interested to hear if we want a page/category with blurry pictures as I don't want to encourage people to upload unclear images "just because there is a category for it". Deadstar 15:49, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

•  Move to Images with blurs, and have it only for images that are intentionally blurred. Images that are too blurred to be useful, where the blur is not intentional, should be marked with {{low quality}} so they can be replaced. -- Editor at Large • talk 00:27, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Images with blurs exists so there is no use for that side any longer --D-Kuru 12:41, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by Odder: non-NPOV, not needed