User talk:Antny08: Difference between revisions

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
Antny08 (talk | contribs)
Updated appeal
Tag: Blocked user editing own talk page
Primefac (talk | contribs)
Line 12: Line 12:
{{unblock|My most recent “copyright” violation was not copyright and was clearly listed for use on Wikipedia / public domain. This photo is also uploaded to Commons under British tanks at Port Said.jpg
{{unblock|My most recent “copyright” violation was not copyright and was clearly listed for use on Wikipedia / public domain. This photo is also uploaded to Commons under British tanks at Port Said.jpg
Not only was this image taken before 1957 (meaning it shouldn’t be protected by copyright), but even if you argued that it is, the Imperial War Museum said it is allowed to be used on primary-information sites, meaning it is allowed on Wikipedia. The site I got the photo from also listed it as public domain.}}
Not only was this image taken before 1957 (meaning it shouldn’t be protected by copyright), but even if you argued that it is, the Imperial War Museum said it is allowed to be used on primary-information sites, meaning it is allowed on Wikipedia. The site I got the photo from also listed it as public domain.}}
:I have to disagree with this block; the image in question is not an obvious copyright violation and I have been discussing such things with Antny08 on my [[:en:User talk:Primefac|enWiki talk page]] to avoid exactly this sort of thing. [[User:Primefac|Primefac]] ([[User talk:Primefac|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 14:38, 15 March 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:38, 15 March 2024

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Antny08!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 17:48, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]


COM:AN/B

Deutsch  English  español  français  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  português  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Tagalog  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  македонски  русский  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  العربية  +/−


Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/Blocks and protections. This is in relation to an issue with which you may have been involved.

Seawolf35 (talk) 13:42, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been blocked

--Bedivere (talk) 14:20, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


This blocked user has asked to be unblocked.
Request reason: "My most recent “copyright” violation was not copyright and was clearly listed for use on Wikipedia / public domain. This photo is also uploaded to Commons under British tanks at Port Said.jpg Not only was this image taken before 1957 (meaning it shouldn’t be protected by copyright), but even if you argued that it is, the Imperial War Museum said it is allowed to be used on primary-information sites, meaning it is allowed on Wikipedia. The site I got the photo from also listed it as public domain."
Blocked editor

Please note that trolling or otherwise abusing your ability to edit your talk page will result in that ability being revoked.

Administrators
  • If this request is declined, it should be replaced with: {{unblock declined|1=reason for request|2=decline reason ~~~~}}
  • If this request is accepted, it should be replaced with: {{unblock granted|1=reason for request|2=grant reason ~~~~}}
  • Do not unblock users without consulting with the administrator who placed the block, except in obvious, uncontroversial cases. Blocks marked as {{checkuserblock}} will be reviewed by a CheckUser.
(Block log)
(unblock)
(Change local status for a global block)
(contribs)

Bahasa Indonesia  Deutsch  español  English  français  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  Plattdüütsch  português  suomi  Tiếng Việt  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  +/−

I have to disagree with this block; the image in question is not an obvious copyright violation and I have been discussing such things with Antny08 on my enWiki talk page to avoid exactly this sort of thing. Primefac (talk) 14:38, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]