User talk:Rich Farmbrough: Difference between revisions

Note

Email may very occasionally be delayed due to spam filtering.

Quote of the day: The clarity of hindsight can deceive even while it illuminates. Thomas L Ahern, Good Questions, Wrong Answers

Links Talk Archive Index

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Dark Grey and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 14#Dark Grey until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Q28 (talk) 05:30, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

With a capital it is an X11 colour. All the best: Rich Farmbrough 07:23, 23 March 2022 (UTC).[reply]

• On our colour pages we should eschew https://color-register.org/ as a source. All the best: Rich Farmbrough 09:15, 21 June 2022 (UTC).[reply]
  

Template:Tropical cyclone classification has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Jason Rees (talk) 22:21, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Slow Blind Driveway and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 22#Slow Blind Driveway until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 17:18, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is easily referenced here, here and strangely enough here. All the best: Rich Farmbrough 07:22, 23 March 2022 (UTC).[reply]

• Also , tangentially, here. Supported here (mailing list, but good enough for a redirect).

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Aluminium(metal) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 23#Aluminium(metal) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 14:29, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:BLP unsourced section has been nominated for merging with Template:Unreferenced section. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. 🐶 EpicPupper ^{(he/him | talk)} 21:25, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:BLP sources section has been nominated for merging with Template:More citations needed section. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. 🐶 EpicPupper ^{(he/him | talk)} 21:58, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Slow Blind Driveway and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 14#Slow Blind Driveway until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 14:42, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Mambele (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

• disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
• disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
• is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Steel1943 (talk) 18:15, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:ISO 639 name from code templates has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Gonnym (talk) 09:28, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Tragic Black albums indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. UnitedStatesian (talk) 03:47, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Quick infobox has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 13:02, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Coats of arms of dioceses of the Philippines indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:45, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:D&D/importance has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:46, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Articles needing attention progress has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 22:07, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rich! I hope you're doing well. I am making my way through the unreferenced articles and noticed that in the 19,000+ articles tagged as December 2009, a good number were not actually created in December 2009. We are all pleased to have gotten through December 2006 so we can say the backlog is (only) 15 years old, but one of the December 2009 articles, as an example, dates back to January 2005. I don't know much about how the bot works but I was wondering if it would be possible to run it again to break down this super-category into more manageable chunks, even if it means re-opening some finished categories. Is this something you would be interested in doing, or think is feasible? I'm trying to get some momentum for WP:URA and could see this as a proverbial kick in the pants to shake things up. Thanks! Kazamzam (talk) 13:52, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it would need a re-write, but it would be possible. All the best: Rich Farmbrough 08:49, 15 June 2022 (UTC).[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:The Ink Spots albums indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:06, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi User:Liz. I've asked you before not to leave me these messages in respect of albums categories. However in this case, the question of what happened to the Ink Spots album articles should be raised. As a pioneering and very important American musical group, quite apart from breaking ground in the industry for African Americans, their work is highly notable, and I am surprised that their albums articles have been deleted. Or more accurately I am not surprised, we seem to prefer deleting articles to finding sources to build them out. All the best: Rich Farmbrough 08:11, 21 June 2022 (UTC).[reply]

A tag has been placed on Quiche Lorraine (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

• disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
• disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
• is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 19:35, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Shhhnotsoloud, since this is now deleted I can't check the history, but I imagine it disambiguated between Quiche Lorraine and Quiche Lorraine (song). All the best: Rich Farmbrough 08:05, 21 June 2022 (UTC).[reply]

It was a redirect to Quiche Lorraine, which was a dab with three entries but has since been converted into an article. This deletion is just housekeeping. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 08:35, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. The correct housekeeping would have been to move the disambiguation page located at the primary title to Quiche Lorraine (disambiguation), before splitting the quiche article. All the best: Rich Farmbrough 08:47, 21 June 2022 (UTC).[reply]

Meh, with only three titles to distinguish and a clear primary topic, hatnotes work fine now that the main title is an article. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 08:56, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You are wrong in two important respects. Firstly you did notify me, and secondly I am not banned. All the best: Rich Farmbrough 08:15, 21 June 2022 (UTC).[reply]

Template:Prefix pages/doc/demo has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Q28 (talk) 06:03, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Issac Wayne (1699-1774) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 12#Issac Wayne (1699-1774) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Dwkaminski (talk) 16:23, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Limited availability has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 17:12, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Grove and Grubb has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:00, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Yard craft has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources are cited within this article, and this has been tagged since March 2021. It seems that this page has been abandoned. However, if someone finds sources, then please remove this PROD and add them to the article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fats40boy11 (talk) 11:39, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Fats40boy11: https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=c15PrCgw56QC for example? All the best: Rich Farmbrough 12:04, 25 August 2022 (UTC).[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Thunderbirds (disambiguation) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 18#Thunderbirds (disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. TNstingray (talk) 12:45, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's often a good idea to talk to the creator of the redirect before listing it. The (disambiguation) qualifier is used in cases where the primary meaning of the term is not clear-cut. In other cases a redirect from the name with the qualifier is provided. All the best: Rich Farmbrough 12:42, 20 September 2022 (UTC).[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect THG (disambiguation) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 24#THG (disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Dgp4004 (talk) 12:03, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:IP V4 summary has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:24, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Claude VonStroke albums indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:08, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Jay Haze albums indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:12, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Pages with invalid ISSN numbers has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. —⁠andrybak (talk) 19:26, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Tribuzy albums indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:07, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Rich. If you have any insight into the problem described at Template talk:Str rep#Pattern match irregularities, can you ping me? Thanks for that template, btw; I use it not infrequently, and it's very handy. Cheers, Mathglot (talk) 08:21, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This has been solved, now, and had to do with the significance of blanks in template parameters. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 19:23, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Bar chart year has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 00:51, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Boris the Sprinkler albums indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:06, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

Eight years!

Thank you for the work on your talk! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:55, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Local Fuzz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Local Fuzz until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Steel1943 (talk) 15:52, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:City Harvest Church albums indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:41, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[User:Liz|] I have asked you before not to notify me about empty album categories. All the best: Rich Farmbrough 02:44, 17 January 2023 (UTC).[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Rudra (band) albums indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:46, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Das Ich albums indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:05, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Continuous mappings has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:26, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Daniel the Prophet and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 10 § Daniel the Prophet until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 08:33, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Mathematics Olympiad and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 12 § Mathematics Olympiad until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Randi Moth (talk) 15:42, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Refugee crisis in germany today and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 15 § Refugee crisis in germany today until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 17:38, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect A Shropshire Gentleman and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 16 § A Shropshire Gentleman until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 07:56, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect A Scots Gentleman in the Swedish Service and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 16 § A Scots Gentleman in the Swedish Service until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 07:57, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Junior Rector of St. Michael and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 16 § Junior Rector of St. Michael until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 07:58, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Captain George Carleton and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 16 § Captain George Carleton until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 08:00, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect A Jobber and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 16 § A Jobber until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 08:00, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect William Smithies and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 16 § William Smithies until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 08:01, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/daniel-defoe-published-under-almost-200-pseudonyms-180964227/ ++ All the best: Rich Farmbrough 11:14, 17 January 2023 (UTC).[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Heliostropolis, Etc. and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 16 § Heliostropolis, Etc. until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 08:01, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Heliostropolis, Etc and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 16 § Heliostropolis, Etc until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 08:02, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect One of the People called Quakers and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 16 § One of the People called Quakers until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 08:04, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Dodge Charger (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

• disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
• disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
• is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Dsuke1998AEOS (talk) 00:28, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:GeneBank has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 18:04, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Mathglot for reverting the above user. I have looked at their few contribs, and all article space edits seem to be vandalism of short descriptions. Their user space edits seem no better. They may also fall afoul of WP:ATTACKNAME. All the best: Rich Farmbrough 16:34, 23 January 2023 (UTC).[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Template:Doctorwhoaudiobook and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 January 24 § Template:Doctorwhoaudiobook until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 22:44, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Nathan Stickman albums indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:15, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey I wanted to thank you for the edit you made on the Seven Deadly Sins article. Someone removed your sentence from the lede. The sentence was “These sins are often thought to be abuses or excessive versions of one's natural faculties or passions (for example, gluttony abuses one's desire to eat).” I readded it. Chrisvacc - ✆ 02:29, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:The Operation M.D. albums indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:13, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]